Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

GT35R over GT37R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 04:41 AM
  #31  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by Gusl
I have the 37r on my car and its 700 rpms slower than the 35
only good answer in here and is the correct one from back to back swaps I have done. not really any point in arguing rpm spool. If someone has a 37r that spools at 4700 rpm, that same setup would spool 35r at 4000. I have aem log of my 35r hitting 26psi at 4000rpm. from my test rides of many cars the 2.0/35r hits full boost at 5100 and the 2.0/37r hits full boost at 5800.

Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Jul 16, 2007 at 04:48 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 08:15 AM
  #32  
Steve@NoLimitmotors's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: LI, NY
no one seems to be considering gear selection either. obviously its gonna hit full boost earlier in 5th then 3rd so I think everyone should be considering that
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 09:05 AM
  #33  
HmanEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Pingree Grove, IL
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
I have aem log of my 35r hitting 26psi at 4000rpm. from my test rides of many cars the 2.0/35r hits full boost at 5100 and the 2.0/37r hits full boost at 5800.
Please post this log that you have. Also what gear and was this on a dyno or street? Thanks.

Originally Posted by Steve@NoLimitmotors
no one seems to be considering gear selection either. obviously its gonna hit full boost earlier in 5th then 3rd so I think everyone should be considering that
I agree and along with that, please post what your "full boost" numbers are. Full boost means something different to everyone whether you're running 20psi on pump or 30psi+ on race gas. It also helps if you're getting these numbers from a MAP sensor log.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 11:23 AM
  #34  
Migsubishi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 13
From: Tampa bay area
Originally Posted by Ev0cRaZy
I really dont care what some of you think, I was trying to be helpful and some of you just wanna be asses. Yes I DO hit full boost at 4500-4700rpms, I do run a Blowthrough setup which made a 300-500rpm faster spool when I installed it.
Not being an ***, I just like facts, sorry if you got offended. The truth of the matter is that I have never seen any type of log or Graph that says a person hits full boost from 4500-4700rpms. Its either one or the other never a range, with that being said it looks like speculation to me. This would mean that there is no graph at all to support this claim. We like facts not what people think,assume,estimate, or speculate. As a newbie or someone just getting into modding for the first time and we all have been there. I would like the most accurate info when spending this type of money on anything.

So when you post, please post facts that can be either backed up or that are believable.

Thanks,
Migsubishi
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 11:29 AM
  #35  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
And for those who may find it interesting . . .

I had:

GT35R, 0.63 A/R T3 turbine housing


I went to:

PT67R, 0.70 A/R T4 divided turbine housing


The PT67R with the much larger, divided T4 housing spools quicker than the GT35R, and feels much more responsive. There are ways to have one's cake and eat it too . . .
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 11:56 AM
  #36  
mudduck's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 657
Likes: 1
From: Charlottesville, VA
Ted B, I would suppose then if one were to take a GT35r with a similar divided housing / twinscroll, they would make a little less power than you, but spool even earlier...
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 12:00 PM
  #37  
Migsubishi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 13
From: Tampa bay area
Originally Posted by Ted B
And for those who may find it interesting . . .

I had:

GT35R, 0.63 A/R T3 turbine housing


I went to:

PT67R, 0.70 A/R T4 divided turbine housing


The PT67R with the much larger, divided T4 housing spools quicker than the GT35R, and feels much more responsive. There are ways to have one's cake and eat it too . . .
Where did you purchase this turno housing and can you pm me a graph supporting this claim. The only reason I left the 67mm is because of spool. What a/r is the housing?
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 12:02 PM
  #38  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by Migsubishi
Where did you purchase this turno housing and can you pm me a graph supporting this claim. The only reason I left the 67mm is because of spool. What a/r is the housing?
It says .70, you can get the divided housings from ATP for the 35/30R series,and you can get the T4 divided housings from most places.

Scorke
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 12:24 PM
  #39  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by mudduck
Ted B, I would suppose then if one were to take a GT35r with a similar divided housing / twinscroll, they would make a little less power than you, but spool even earlier...
That would be a logical assumption, but I don't know about the availability of a true T4, divided for a GT35R. Someone may want to comment on this. I think what I've seen look more like 1.06 A/R T3 housings with a T4 flange or something unusual. I'm sure Geoff knows more about GT35R possibilities.


Originally Posted by Migsubishi
Where did you purchase this turno housing and can you pm me a graph supporting this claim. The only reason I left the 67mm is because of spool. What a/r is the housing?
Scorke answered part of the question. As to the graph, I haven't digitized it. We were having other issues, so I didn't bother. Rest assured that the dyno doesn't show just how much of a difference there is between a T3 and divided T4 at ALL throttle positions and rpm. The T3 feels dead. The divided T4 feels like it always wants to GO.

In fact, it works soooo well, that I am contemplating going a bit larger on the turbine side . . .

Last edited by Ted B; Jul 16, 2007 at 01:02 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 12:33 PM
  #40  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by Ted B

In fact, it works soooo well, that I am contemplating going a bit larger on the turbine side . . .

Ted, do you feel that going larger on the turbine side is easier because your now running twin scroll, and how do you expect that to effect the shape of your curve vs going with a larger compressor wheel?

Is the only real downside to the larger compressor the increased mass/inertia of the wheel, if not what else? I just feel that a larger turbine will kill some of what you gained over the 35R setup, no doubt with a lot more top end..

Can you stuff a 67mm wheel on/in a 35R compressor housing/center section? If not do you know anybody that does anything like that?

I remember Walker's buddy that lives in SC near me in Clemson (twinturbo240z) is his tag telling me about the Big Kahuna's they used to run, which I think was something similar to what I am asking about?

Scorke

Last edited by scorke; Jul 16, 2007 at 12:36 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 12:47 PM
  #41  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
I'm not sold just yet on the larger turbine side. I am only contemplating it, given the nature of the engine configuration that is going into the car in the next few weeks. Rest assured I'm not anxious to give up any response unless our pressure testing indicates we're likely to gain more than we give.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 01:05 PM
  #42  
apagan01's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (299)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,863
Likes: 5
From: digging for oil
anyone with turbo knowlege will recomend a G35 all day long. best bang for the buck and quicker spool up about 300-500 rpm quiker than a 37
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 01:15 PM
  #43  
pjsevo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: Tucson
never had a 35r on the car but i can say my turbo is a pt67r with a .82 hotside. My block is a built 2.0 I am going to switch to a 2.1 soon. I start spool at about 4200 and hit full boost in between 5500-6000. It is a smooth powerband so the lag isnt annoying to me at all. I have been dd it these past couple of weeks and it works out fine. Hope this info helps.

PJ
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 01:20 PM
  #44  
slicedbreadno2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
subscribes.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 01:27 PM
  #45  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by pjsevo8
... my turbo is a pt67r with a .82 hotside. My block is a built 2.0 ... I start spool at about 4200 and hit full boost in between 5500-6000.
That appears to be about right.

FWIW, to make a comparison with the very same turbo using a .70 A/R divided T4 hotside, full boost (25 psi on 93 oct) comes about 1000rpm quicker.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:41 AM.