GT35R over GT37R
only good answer in here and is the correct one from back to back swaps I have done. not really any point in arguing rpm spool. If someone has a 37r that spools at 4700 rpm, that same setup would spool 35r at 4000. I have aem log of my 35r hitting 26psi at 4000rpm. from my test rides of many cars the 2.0/35r hits full boost at 5100 and the 2.0/37r hits full boost at 5800.
Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Jul 16, 2007 at 04:48 AM.
I agree and along with that, please post what your "full boost" numbers are. Full boost means something different to everyone whether you're running 20psi on pump or 30psi+ on race gas. It also helps if you're getting these numbers from a MAP sensor log.
So when you post, please post facts that can be either backed up or that are believable.
Thanks,
Migsubishi
And for those who may find it interesting . . .
I had:
GT35R, 0.63 A/R T3 turbine housing
I went to:
PT67R, 0.70 A/R T4 divided turbine housing
The PT67R with the much larger, divided T4 housing spools quicker than the GT35R, and feels much more responsive. There are ways to have one's cake and eat it too . . .
I had:
GT35R, 0.63 A/R T3 turbine housing
I went to:
PT67R, 0.70 A/R T4 divided turbine housing
The PT67R with the much larger, divided T4 housing spools quicker than the GT35R, and feels much more responsive. There are ways to have one's cake and eat it too . . .
Ted B, I would suppose then if one were to take a GT35r with a similar divided housing / twinscroll, they would make a little less power than you, but spool even earlier...
And for those who may find it interesting . . .
I had:
GT35R, 0.63 A/R T3 turbine housing
I went to:
PT67R, 0.70 A/R T4 divided turbine housing
The PT67R with the much larger, divided T4 housing spools quicker than the GT35R, and feels much more responsive. There are ways to have one's cake and eat it too . . .
I had:
GT35R, 0.63 A/R T3 turbine housing
I went to:
PT67R, 0.70 A/R T4 divided turbine housing
The PT67R with the much larger, divided T4 housing spools quicker than the GT35R, and feels much more responsive. There are ways to have one's cake and eat it too . . .
Scorke
In fact, it works soooo well, that I am contemplating going a bit larger on the turbine side . . .
Last edited by Ted B; Jul 16, 2007 at 01:02 PM.
Ted, do you feel that going larger on the turbine side is easier because your now running twin scroll, and how do you expect that to effect the shape of your curve vs going with a larger compressor wheel?
Is the only real downside to the larger compressor the increased mass/inertia of the wheel, if not what else? I just feel that a larger turbine will kill some of what you gained over the 35R setup, no doubt with a lot more top end..
Can you stuff a 67mm wheel on/in a 35R compressor housing/center section? If not do you know anybody that does anything like that?
I remember Walker's buddy that lives in SC near me in Clemson (twinturbo240z) is his tag telling me about the Big Kahuna's they used to run, which I think was something similar to what I am asking about?
Scorke
Last edited by scorke; Jul 16, 2007 at 12:36 PM.
I'm not sold just yet on the larger turbine side. I am only contemplating it, given the nature of the engine configuration that is going into the car in the next few weeks. Rest assured I'm not anxious to give up any response unless our pressure testing indicates we're likely to gain more than we give.
never had a 35r on the car but i can say my turbo is a pt67r with a .82 hotside. My block is a built 2.0 I am going to switch to a 2.1 soon. I start spool at about 4200 and hit full boost in between 5500-6000. It is a smooth powerband so the lag isnt annoying to me at all. I have been dd it these past couple of weeks and it works out fine. Hope this info helps.
PJ
PJ
FWIW, to make a comparison with the very same turbo using a .70 A/R divided T4 hotside, full boost (25 psi on 93 oct) comes about 1000rpm quicker.






