ok well then u can tell my car that it doesnt make good power, because it will show u otherwise. if u ask me 472 wheel from 25 psi isnt half bad.

 

From what i've seen on the 20G-LT vs 3076 debate, you're both "right." The 20g-LT and the 3076 both make similar hp numbers, but the 20G spools up sooner and runs out on top - making a good hp number but not carrying it for very long. The 3076 however seems to make some more hp and carries it for significantly longer. On a drag strip, with the correct shift points, they'll probably run similar times, but on a road course the higher RPM power of the 3076 should pay dividends since you can stay in a lower gear longer.

 

What else would you like to know?

Last time I checked this is a PUBLIC forum....a PUBLIC forum with free speech,discussion, debates,etc... and paying vendors to TALK about parts and HELP people.

You need to look into things a bit more before you attempt to fly off the handle and cop an attitude. Im in here having a DISCUSSION not a EvoM pissing match like you're trying to turn it into with your attitude.

Where did you get that we dont sell a 3076 anymore? https://secure.buschurracing.com/cat...00fd1af8dc511e

When that is purchased you have your choice of what 30 series turbo you would like. I never knew of a 30R to be just that. It needs the other 2 numbers after the 30 and before the R right?

Again #'s will vary between dyno's, part combination's, tuning, etc.... so claiming what the 3076 does compared to the 3065 on so and so's car is like comparing apples to oranges. Its possible the car could make similar power depending on the parts combination.


On what kind of dyno? Whats the best time your car has ran? just curious....

 

havent run the car yet and it was ics's dynojet. and i have looked into things very much in depth. my first choice was actually the 3065 but at the time i didnt have the money for the kit, when it was 3k so i went to a company that i have delt with many times in the past and paid 800 less.

like i said from what i have seen on here with dyno sheets and track times (other than yours) the 3076 and the 3065 are very comparable. and i didnt mean to come off as an ******* but sometimes vendors like to flex there muscle and not give other companys or turbo choices a chance.

 

hey jarrod, whats the spool up like on an evo 9 running 93 on your 3065 kit? im trying to steer away from meth

 

Its straight man. Most people on here would know im a pretty easy going dude and just willing to help out. Im not one for really arguing especially online but I do have my moments as anyone does. I wasnt knocking anyone or any setup just stating my opinion. I give other people / companies credit where credit is due.

The comment about them being very close can be true and David even just mentioned to me that he would say the 3076 would be a decent competitor for the 3065. As I said earlier its all in the parts combination and tuning. We have had cars that have ran some different exhaust, intake, etc... and had some problems making power but once we changed the problem part out or messed around to see what the problem was the car wakes up to where it should be.


With cams and all of the other supporting mods I would say you would be looking in the early 4000 range.

My car on 94 octane would make 20psi right around 4400.

 

i do on the other hand feel like the 3065 will make more power up top due to it being half 35r. so with that said, lets have a

 

i can live w/ that, be ordering in a couple months

 

I find it terribly amusing that a 3065 (GT3082R) and a GT3076R are being compared like they're even close to in the same ballpark. That and the GT3582R will obviously outflow the 3065 since it's got the 35R turbine and (likely) a bigger, easier breathing hotside.

Can we compare stock turbos with 42r's next?

I think the real question is how does the 3065 compare to the same turbo when it's in the T3 housing versus the bolt-on setup. Well, it's more interesting to me anyway. [shrug]

 

i think deadbeat needs to get off the juice, sounds like he has serious mood swings.lol

 

Even though this thread has gone way off topic, I figured I'd share my DLL dyno sheet for anyone that happens upon this thread. Although the numbers don't mean a whole lot, the shape of the curve does. This is on a 2.3 stroker with HKS 272 cams and a 3" TBE with a HFC running speed density using MAFTpro. This pull was at 26 psi on 93 octane (no meth). I could probably squeeze a bit more out of it but decided to keep things slightly conservative.

-Paul

 

yea,I overdose on vitamin C all the time.