2.4L stroker turbo AR and trim question.
For this application (where minimum lag is a priority) probably so, but I'm of the belief that if one were going to use a T4 flanged turbo and wanted to a housing that size, he just may gain more from using a smaller turbo than he loses.
ok I'm trying to make sense of all this. Ted B are you saying that the GT3076 with a .82 hotside would be fine but any thing larger would not be benificial to me and that considering that I'm running 91 oct a 0.63 A/R may be more beneficial to me? Did I mention that I will be running Water/Meth injection? ... what im trying to achieve is full spool by 4K RPMS maby plus a couple hundered or so RPM'S
The purpose of a larger hotside is to reduce backpressure. Backpressure is more or less a function of power (air mass flow). My point is I do not believe you're going to make enough power with 91 octane + water/meth mix to cause a .82 A/R hotside to be a limiting factor. There is a point whereby going larger costs more in spool time than it gains in power potential, and I strongly believe you're in that category if considering anything larger than .82 A/R for a 2.4L engine that is going to be most mechanically efficient at midrange rpm, with a moderate sized turbo, and with limited octane.
I have two housings in my possession and not sure which to use, I have a T4 .58 and a T4 .68 I have been told that there is a 300rpm lag differance between housings. Whats is your take on this?
The purpose of a larger hotside is to reduce backpressure. Backpressure is more or less a function of power (air mass flow). My point is I do not believe you're going to make enough power with 91 octane + water/meth mix to cause a .82 A/R hotside to be a limiting factor. There is a point whereby going larger costs more in spool time than it gains in power potential, and I strongly believe you're in that category if considering anything larger than .82 A/R for a 2.4L engine that is going to be most mechanically efficient at midrange rpm, with a moderate sized turbo, and with limited octane.
Sorry for sounding so redundant.
The purpose of a larger hotside is to reduce backpressure. Backpressure is more or less a function of power (air mass flow). My point is I do not believe you're going to make enough power with 91 octane + water/meth mix to cause a .82 A/R hotside to be a limiting factor. There is a point whereby going larger costs more in spool time than it gains in power potential, and I strongly believe you're in that category if considering anything larger than .82 A/R for a 2.4L engine that is going to be most mechanically efficient at midrange rpm, with a moderate sized turbo, and with limited octane.

Now back to Rod/stroke ratio. What do you feel is max RPM for this motor. Road Race seems to think 8.1K is fine...i was worried about going over 7.5K. Rod/stroke ratio is somthing i need to learn more about, you know of any threads/sites that have good explainations?
and...
Originally Posted by version 2 beta
this should be move to the "other car" sub forum
Sorry for asking knowledgeable people about somthing you prolly have no idea how to do. I wanted to learn, i figured this section would get the most traffic/chance of a correct answer.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MagicManRed
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
50
Jun 21, 2010 07:59 AM
pwerks
Evo 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
38
Sep 21, 2009 08:42 PM
norcalSRTrida
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
20
Sep 23, 2008 11:45 AM








