362whp/363.77wtq pump gas Evo IX!
I know--I just purchased a Fidanza cam gear for my wife's IX. What I was saying is that I've never seen adjustable cam gears make more than 5whp on a car. I haven't seen any Evo dyno's showing the gains, but have on other cars such as an S2000.
The difference here is the N/A engine to a turbo charged one. I think you should look into funny car racing and see how mutch power you can pick up by degreeing the engine.
The power i made was in 98* weather and it was soooooooooo hot in that dyno bay... Its not about the tuner, my tuner got the most power out the car as he could SAFELY... Im sure if it would have been in the low 80s, 370whp+ could def be attainable.. I am VERY happy with my tune and my tuners work, no doubt about it.... I WILL be visiting the dyno when it cools down and retune and try to get 370+ on pump gas 93
After looking at your dyno graph, I suggust you to stop saying XXXwhp is possible on a XXdegree day because the correction factor is set to SAE, which showed at 1.04.
AFAIK, 1.02 means there's a 2% correction factor on your particular dyno runs, based on a bunch of measures of weather condition (temp, humidity, atmosphere pressure?? etc)
You can divide your dyno # by 1.02 to obtain a true uncorrrected dyno # that your car actually made on that day under that condition.
You can divide your dyno # by 1.02 to obtain a true uncorrrected dyno # that your car actually made on that day under that condition.
Dyno numbers shouldn't be worn like a badge of honor, but used as a tool. Which it really is. People in the know, know that HP differs from dyno to dyno, even the same ones.
What we should really be looking at are quarter mile times. Because if you laid down 400awhp, and can't run as fast as the guy who put down 370, then that's a problem.
What we should really be looking at are quarter mile times. Because if you laid down 400awhp, and can't run as fast as the guy who put down 370, then that's a problem.



