Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Dynoed brog warner 362

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 05:33 PM
  #46  
VIPGarage's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, VA
We have an S256 on our buddies car. It hits like a bat out of hall but initial spool is a bit delayed.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 06:39 PM
  #47  
Exciting News's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 844
Likes: 1
From: local area man
Originally Posted by VIPGarage
We have an S256 on our buddies car. It hits like a bat out of hall but initial spool is a bit delayed.
That's unfortunate. I had high hopes for the S256 and gave this turbo great consideration, but the little info available on these pieces with respect to Evos just isn't promising. With the green/50trim/3076 already well established there's nothing compelling about this offering to diverge from the norm.

Supposedly, BW is releasing BB turbos in the (near?) future. Now a twin-scroll ball-bearing extended tip S256 sounds like a winner.

Do you have a dyno chart of this S256?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 07:50 PM
  #48  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
according to the info i have been told they have no plan for a BB turbo and these turbos are supposed to have the same or better spool..
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 08:43 PM
  #49  
joeracer321's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: California
The only downside to the BW line of turbos that I see is they are not readily available in a kit... If you are a Do It Yourself-er or you have a shop piece together a custom kit, these turbos are great. They have been proven in many other applications but have not quite caught on in the Evo market due to the market domination by AMS, Buschur and Full-Race.... There is nothing wrong with this as they provide quality products and the kits are easy for the average owner to install, but since they are already producing the GT kits it would simply cost more for them to redesign the kit to fit the BW turbos. If the demand for the BW products appears, one of the vendors would quickly provide a kit. A while back I saw SLS beginning to produce a kit, I am not sure what happened there though.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 08:52 PM
  #50  
VIPGarage's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, VA
Originally Posted by USP Motorsports
according to the info i have been told they have no plan for a BB turbo and these turbos are supposed to have the same or better spool..
That's what we were told too.... not so much. It doesn't spool faster than a T04E 50trim but it does hit harder. It has a hit like no other turbo we have ever felt in that size range.

Originally Posted by joeracer321
The only downside to the BW line of turbos that I see is they are not readily available in a kit...
dude we've offered the S256 in a kit for about a year now. lol

The turbo isn't a bad turbo, it hits like a bat out of hell. We have just been working on getting the spool down. Once we do it will be one hell of a contender.

I haven't heard anything about going BB either.

Last edited by VIPGarage; Nov 30, 2007 at 08:56 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 08:57 PM
  #51  
SPEED's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: PG County, MD
How did you do at the strip?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 09:52 PM
  #52  
EVOllie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 317
Likes: 1
From: Bel Air, Maryland
Originally Posted by USP Motorsports
not sure what the .jpg has to do with the quote???
lol hes pointing out ive been spelling it wrong, my fault
BORG WARNER, maybe a mod can fix the thread title for me?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 10:18 PM
  #53  
EVOllie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 317
Likes: 1
From: Bel Air, Maryland
Originally Posted by SPEED
How did you do at the strip?
not good, just got back. when mike tuned it he must of forgot to put my rev back to 8200rpm i need it there, even though my graph dropps im still making usable power to 8k( he just lets out early). so i was bouncing the rev in 3rd (cause im use to pulling it all the way to 8k) and hitting the rev the last 100ft or so, basicly giving up the run.
still got a 11.6@125 out of it, i dont have the cable or lap top yet. so i had no way to fix it at the track. besides the rev limitier and the cold *** track (1.8 60') the car was mmmovin.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 10:21 PM
  #54  
Gusl's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: Miami
looking good man.
Congrats!

Originally Posted by EVOllie
Tuned by mike @ mid atlantic motorsports, maryland. Using ecu flash. Car was on c-16/pump gas mix.
Made 555@ 32psi but needing a second pump, i was running out of fuel.
backed it down to 29 and made 524 with pretty safe a/f and timing.

Mods are in sig, and this is on a stock block. Turbo is pretty laggy but u cant tell at the strip. street....different story, but nothing a lil brake boost cant fix


View My Video
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #55  
EVOllie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 317
Likes: 1
From: Bel Air, Maryland
Originally Posted by crcain
I'm not sure you can tell how a car will spool on the road based on a dyno run.

Also he says he's running a larger exhaust housing than the usual .63 a/r GT35's.
very true, i have vids. just cant post the ones i got ( pm me). the car is laggy if im cruising at 3k and floor it. but who the hell does that?
if this was a rally car or auto cross car, yes that graph would suck. but i dont do that.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 11:23 PM
  #56  
SPEED's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: PG County, MD
Originally Posted by EVOllie
not good, just got back. when mike tuned it he must of forgot to put my rev back to 8200rpm i need it there, even though my graph dropps im still making usable power to 8k( he just lets out early). so i was bouncing the rev in 3rd (cause im use to pulling it all the way to 8k) and hitting the rev the last 100ft or so, basicly giving up the run.
still got a 11.6@125 out of it, i dont have the cable or lap top yet. so i had no way to fix it at the track. besides the rev limitier and the cold *** track (1.8 60') the car was mmmovin.
Are you shifting early with 1-2? My rev limiter is set at 7800 on my stock motor and never have a problem going through the 1/4. I wouldn't pull to 8200 too often with the stock motor. I can't see your graph from where i'm at, so I can't really see how laggy your set up is. Seems like your making good power on the dyno. Although, I think their dyno reads kinda high. Even though I ran my best et with a trap of only 125mph, my best was a 128 on the previous run. I only made 430whp on DTM's mustang. I will give you a couple mph for bouncing off the rev limiter. But with 550whp, you should be well over 130mph. I'm pretty sure she's still a beast to drive. Enjoy your car
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 12:11 AM
  #57  
EvoRecordSetter's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
rev that sucker!!
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 12:16 AM
  #58  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
Originally Posted by EVOllie
Mods are in sig, and this is on a stock block.
Stock torque to yield rodbolts?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 06:27 AM
  #59  
EVOllie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 317
Likes: 1
From: Bel Air, Maryland
Originally Posted by SPEED
Are you shifting early with 1-2? My rev limiter is set at 7800 on my stock motor and never have a problem going through the 1/4. I wouldn't pull to 8200 too often with the stock motor. I can't see your graph from where i'm at, so I can't really see how laggy your set up is. Seems like your making good power on the dyno. Although, I think their dyno reads kinda high. Even though I ran my best et with a trap of only 125mph, my best was a 128 on the previous run. I only made 430whp on DTM's mustang. I will give you a couple mph for bouncing off the rev limiter. But with 550whp, you should be well over 130mph. I'm pretty sure she's still a beast to drive. Enjoy your car
1. im totally aware of not pulling the car too 8200 too often on stock motor.
2. i do short shift 1-2, the rest i take to 7800-7900, i only take the car to 8000-8200 in fourth.
3. i didnt have a problem going through the 1/4 too when i had 440 hp and 7800k rev. now i have over 500 and my rev was lowered to 7500-7600k
4. im not on 550...im running 524. which in my opion should not be over 130

maybe its just me but 430hp and 128 dont sound right, unless u and your car is a couple hundred pounds lighter than me.

Last edited by EVOllie; Dec 1, 2007 at 06:32 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 06:59 AM
  #60  
DS-03evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: Central PA
Originally Posted by EVOllie
1. im totally aware of not pulling the car too 8200 too often on stock motor.
2. i do short shift 1-2, the rest i take to 7800-7900, i only take the car to 8000-8200 in fourth.
3. i didnt have a problem going through the 1/4 too when i had 440 hp and 7800k rev. now i have over 500 and my rev was lowered to 7500-7600k
4. im not on 550...im running 524. which in my opion should not be over 130

maybe its just me but 430hp and 128 dont sound right, unless u and your car is a couple hundred pounds lighter than me.
His 430 was on a mustang though...should be much higher on a dynojet!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:26 AM.