Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Uk GSC S2's on Stock Turbo Result

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 02:36 AM
  #1  
EVO Scotland's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
Uk GSC S2's on Stock Turbo Result

see here on the MLR

Cant belive the numbers

http://www.lancerregister.com/showth...5&pagenumber=1
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 03:02 AM
  #2  
Racexerxes's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: FL
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 10:58 AM
  #3  
SWOLN's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 13
From: In the Florida Swamps
Gained 38.5 hp. and 55.7 lbs. of Torque from the stock cams to GSC S2's, on the stock turbo? Did I read that right?

Last edited by SWOLN; Dec 1, 2007 at 11:03 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 01:26 PM
  #4  
yikez's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: over there
damn ..

should i have gotten the s2's insead :/

didn't read the thread, how's the idle though?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 01:26 PM
  #5  
8UpUrV8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Houston
that's crazy, whats the gain from stock cams to S1's?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 01:53 PM
  #6  
Boltz.'s Avatar
Evolved Member
FCOTM Winner
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, IL
First of all the car made 426whp @ 1.7 bar on the stock turbo on a dastek dyno. That much HP with that little boost on a stock turbo car along with the fact that this is a dyno that isn't common in the US makes it certain that it is a high reading dyno which would also lead to higher gains from modification.

Given that, those numbers seem pretty on par with what S1's make.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 04:38 PM
  #7  
Goodi32's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
Post Dyno results soon! I can't wait to see it.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 04:45 PM
  #8  
cangriracing's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Flat Rock, NC
i thought those cams were for gt35rs and up, interesting thread or is their turbo bigguer than our usdm 9s?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 06:00 PM
  #9  
EVO Scotland's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
just shows they aint for a GT35 and up
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 06:07 PM
  #10  
Evoryder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 10
From: ☼ Florida ☼
am i the only one tripping on how they type exactly how the talk?

I'm from london...it's just funny reading the thread. I thought for a second "tae" was an acronym for something to do with cars??...then I realized what they were saying...so i read it with a Scottish accent. Lol ...sorry I had to share

back on topic
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 06:11 PM
  #11  
EVO Scotland's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
Originally Posted by Evoryder
am i the only one tripping on how they type exactly how the talk?

I'm from london...it's just funny reading the thread. I thought for a second "tae" was an acronym for something to do with cars??...then I realized what they were saying...so i read it with a Scottish accent. Lol ...sorry I had to share

back on topic
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 06:14 PM
  #12  
Evoryder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 10
From: ☼ Florida ☼
Originally Posted by EVO Scotland
have a pint mate. I cannae wait for the graphs
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 09:00 PM
  #13  
Exciting News's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 844
Likes: 1
From: local area man
Originally Posted by Boltz.
First of all the car made 426whp @ 1.7 bar on the stock turbo on a dastek dyno. That much HP with that little boost on a stock turbo car along with the fact that this is a dyno that isn't common in the US makes it certain that it is a high reading dyno which would also lead to higher gains from modification.

Given that, those numbers seem pretty on par with what S1's make.
The 426 is bhp NOT whp. Our transatlantic brothers tend to list both bhp (brake horsepower) AND bhp atw (brake horsepower at-the-wheels). His whp was listed as 372 with the S2s and 323 with the stock cams.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 09:29 PM
  #14  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Don't get too bogged down in trying to get a read on the dyno numbers. Look at the percent improvement instead.

Take the after whp figure and divide it by the baseline whp figure. That is 373whp / 328whp = 1.137. That equates to a 13.7% increase in peak power.

I'd say those numbers however do seem in the ballpark of what I'd expect to see on a Dynojet. Not too shabby for just a cam change.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 09:38 PM
  #15  
smp3000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,631
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
dang!!! I've planning on going with the S1'S on an 05' turbo with upgraded O2 housing. Maybe S2"s?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:09 AM.