Buschur vs AMS racing battery?
Dec 14, 2007, 05:36 PM
#5
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
now we're e-racing batteries? perhaps we could get representatives of each company to come in here and show dyno graphs of their batteries on load testing CCA dynos?
seriously, it's hard enough for both competing companies to show respect to each other on here and keep their tongues bit about each other and not try and show they're the best at everything; cut this useless crap out - a small battery kit is a small battery kit - you know you're going to get quality product and service from both companies
seriously, it's hard enough for both competing companies to show respect to each other on here and keep their tongues bit about each other and not try and show they're the best at everything; cut this useless crap out - a small battery kit is a small battery kit - you know you're going to get quality product and service from both companies
Dec 14, 2007, 06:36 PM
#7
I have a braille 15lb battery and even here in the cold Chicago weather its been holding up. I tested the small battery stronger than the stock battery. The only bad thing is the small battery doesnt have a long reserve capacity. This means you cant listen to your radio long without the engine running for a long time or the battery will go dead.
Trending Topics
Ive had a few drinks so i could have spelled that wrong
Dec 14, 2007, 08:43 PM
#13
Only difference I could think of: http://www.amsperformance.com/store/...oducts_id=1663
Edit; actually that appears it would work with both batteries. NVM.
Edit; actually that appears it would work with both batteries. NVM.
Dec 14, 2007, 08:52 PM
#14
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually they are the AMS and BR batteries are different.
BR uses a physically stronger battery (ie the internals are more beefy) at the sacrifice of some CCA (cold cranking amps)
AMS uses an electrically stronger battery (more CCA) at the sacrifice of some resistance to abuse (vibration and shock)
Both work well but require a bit more attention than a full size battery. They do not do well when a car is stored for a long period of time without being run. Once fully discharged, they will only take about an 80% charge after that.
BR uses a physically stronger battery (ie the internals are more beefy) at the sacrifice of some CCA (cold cranking amps)
AMS uses an electrically stronger battery (more CCA) at the sacrifice of some resistance to abuse (vibration and shock)
Both work well but require a bit more attention than a full size battery. They do not do well when a car is stored for a long period of time without being run. Once fully discharged, they will only take about an 80% charge after that.
Oct 12, 2011, 12:56 PM
#15
Actually they are the AMS and BR batteries are different.
BR uses a physically stronger battery (ie the internals are more beefy) at the sacrifice of some CCA (cold cranking amps)
AMS uses an electrically stronger battery (more CCA) at the sacrifice of some resistance to abuse (vibration and shock)
Both work well but require a bit more attention than a full size battery. They do not do well when a car is stored for a long period of time without being run. Once fully discharged, they will only take about an 80% charge after that.
BR uses a physically stronger battery (ie the internals are more beefy) at the sacrifice of some CCA (cold cranking amps)
AMS uses an electrically stronger battery (more CCA) at the sacrifice of some resistance to abuse (vibration and shock)
Both work well but require a bit more attention than a full size battery. They do not do well when a car is stored for a long period of time without being run. Once fully discharged, they will only take about an 80% charge after that.