Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Intake manifold testing.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 11:05 PM
  #31  
wshihdnevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma
This idea seems different, I like how the manifold looks and it should be interesting to see the results w/ this larger plenum.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 09:41 AM
  #32  
tabio42's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by atlvalet
I thought somewhere at sometime Dave Buschur said he tested intake manifolds and stated that nothing was to be gained. In fact, Dave said, IIRC, that he lost approximately 30hp when he did his "test." Dave has said numerous times that you really can't do better than the 65mm TB and ported OEM intake manifold "Because that's what I have on my x.xx second car." I would love to know about and/or see the thread where Dave had this new argument he alludes to with someone about intake manifolds.

FWIW, people on this board have already done testing like this (and I'm willing to bet they understand the math behind intake manifold design). Here's one example of such data:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...ntake+manifold

People say **** all the time. Manifolds can lose power in certain areas and make power in other areas of the RPM band. You know that. Maybe that's what he meant before about it losing power.

As far as the ported stock manifold being the best choice- it IS the best choice for the money. $75 for 15WHP peak without losing power throughout the RPMs is awesome. The only other thing that will gain you that much power for the price is a tactrix cable. Plus everyone wants to sell his product. Just like the best catalytic converter is the one you sell.

Regardless of the reasoning behind it, he's doing an objective test that will benefit the community. Let the man post some dyno numbers then you can say whatever you want.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 09:51 AM
  #33  
Oracle1's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
IMHO HKS intake mani would make a good/reasonable benchmark for test?

From my understanding a 75mm TB alone should make an increase in power.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 09:52 AM
  #34  
Paul Nelson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
Awesome work Dave I feel between the both of us we should come up with some very good data on the manifolds out there. I think im sitting on 12 manifolds right now.

Look forward to your results
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 10:02 AM
  #35  
tabio42's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
^ That is another reason the community will benefit. We have two capable testers and can compare results. GJ Paul.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #36  
EvoIXMR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tabio42
People say **** all the time. Manifolds can lose power in certain areas and make power in other areas of the RPM band. You know that. Maybe that's what he meant before about it losing power.

As far as the ported stock manifold being the best choice- it IS the best choice for the money. $75 for 15WHP peak without losing power throughout the RPMs is awesome. The only other thing that will gain you that much power for the price is a tactrix cable. Plus everyone wants to sell his product. Just like the best catalytic converter is the one you sell.

Regardless of the reasoning behind it, he's doing an objective test that will benefit the community. Let the man post some dyno numbers then you can say whatever you want.
OK, not to be an azz, buschur said 15whp with 65mm TB and ported IM combo, thats more like $275 or something, I think.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 10:30 AM
  #37  
ENVY-THIS's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: MidWest
Bump for ifarted2 and buschur for the testing i'm not interested in over all max power at top, but power through out the whole rpm band.....keep us posted
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #38  
EvoPooPoo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: Midwest!!!
Once results are gathered...make it into a "sticky"...??? along with ifarted's info?
Please....

Won't there be controversy over how the tests will be performed?
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 10:44 AM
  #39  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
EvoPooPoo, there is always controversy over how testing is done. I will even go out on a limb here and say if ifarted and myself test the same intake manifolds we are going to get different results.

As for any negative comments that are in this thread now, I am ignoring them. I don't care to argue about this **** anymore.

The last testing I did I got some BS comments so I kept the information mostly to myself.......the haters are overtaking the good information. The more hate I get, the less I post, it's quite good for me and our direct customers, they will continue to go faster from all the testing

Have a nice day.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 11:06 AM
  #40  
wshihdnevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma
Depending on the results, will you make this manifold available Dave? Just wondering if this is just a more in-house project to see, or depending on how it works, something you will start to produce?
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 11:15 AM
  #41  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
wshihdnevo, IF the results of this intake manifold were really good then yes, we would produce it. I highly doubt my "homebrew" intake is going to outperform AMS's or Hypertune's. We'll see though.

Also altavet, you said you wanted to see my old testing. I have been searching and found this from a post in 2005:

Originally Posted by davidbuschur
The clipping of the turbine was definetely marginal at best. Something that I am not going to push to anyone. The decreased backpressure in the turbine housing did allow more timing to be added but in the end the power was still down overall. I was surprised as that is not what I expected. There has been alot of testing done that I didn't see what I expected........which brings me to the intake manifold.

I don't honestly know what the deal is with the intake manifold testing. I put more work into trying to make the extrude honed intake and sheetmetal intake make more power than I did to any other part. Most, if not all, of the other parts tested were an instant realization of power or you could atleast look at the datalog and see if something needed to be changed to make the power. For example, put on a new part see the boost drop 3 pounds, simple, turn it back up and test again. See the AFR's go real lean, add some fuel and test again. With the intakes I couldn't really see what was going on. The boost did drop with them but no matter what I tried I could not get it back. Up until I added both intakes I was able to hold 19-20 psi at redline. After I have had less and less boost. There are no leaks, no blow by, no headgasket issues. I believe the airflow was increased with both intakes and the turbo has just become "smaller" and "smaller" as the efficiency of the engine has increased.

Right now I have the wastegate actuator arm as tight as it can go. With just a straight hose running from the intake to the actuator it will put out about 15 psi of boost. Like this the car STILL made just short of 350 whp at redline. This was amazing to me. I think I saved the dyno sheet, it would be an interesting one for you guys to look at. Remind me I will post it here. Amazing what a boost control does to low end power.
www.buschurracing.com
I am trying to find the actual post where I talked about it but as can be seen from above someone asked me about my results and I answered. This should be atleast proof it was discusses somewhere. Can you get off my butt now as being a "doubter"? I'd appreciate it.

For more reading on this discussion when it took place to here: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...112506&page=21

Last edited by David Buschur; Feb 1, 2008 at 11:17 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 11:26 AM
  #42  
Wicked E's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
David-

I'm really come around the block in the last month. I need to send you a personal PM.

Cheers-
Erich
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 11:30 AM
  #43  
evo_08's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
From: bush LA
dave i have a bjs if you want to test it.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 11:41 AM
  #44  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Dave,

Is there *any* way you would consider putting on a stock, unported intake manifold into the mix of this test? Possibly with and w/o a ported stock TB? I have seen numerous posts about the claimed gains for these, but I cannot for the life of me find any dyno graphs showing such. If not, I understand. But, since this test is for a magazine, perhaps more biz would be steered your way for the ported stockers, or your new frankenmanifold
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 11:50 AM
  #45  
EvoPooPoo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: Midwest!!!
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
EvoPooPoo, there is always controversy over how testing is done. I will even go out on a limb here and say if ifarted and myself test the same intake manifolds we are going to get different results.

As for any negative comments that are in this thread now, I am ignoring them. I don't care to argue about this **** anymore.

The last testing I did I got some BS comments so I kept the information mostly to myself.......the haters are overtaking the good information. The more hate I get, the less I post, it's quite good for me and our direct customers, they will continue to go faster from all the testing

Have a nice day.
I completely agree on the "the haters are overtaking the good information"
I just meant controversy over consistency, however with you and ifarted doing similar testing... wouldn't be much of a controversy.
Your valued time to help out the community is much appreciated!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:09 AM.