Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

403whp Mustang Dyno FPgreen

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #1  
RazorLab's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
403whp Mustang Dyno FPgreen

I retuned a local guy with 110 octane couple weeks ago with a FPgreen.

Before, he did 374whp/328wtq on 100 oct, 25psi peak.

Retuned on 110 octane:

2005 Evo 8

Mods:

TBE no cat
GSC S1 cams
Stock cam gears
Tubular header
FPgreen turbo
Tubular 02 housing
Sun HyperForce
GST Open Filter
Denso 720cc injectors
Fuel Pump
FMIC
Boost Assembly (ecu-controlled boost)
110 octane
Factory ECU and MAF

403whp / 360wtq

27psi peak to 23psi at 7400rpm.

Low reading mustang dyno. 400 is basically the "holy grail" on this dyno on a turbo like this. First FPgreen locally that has done over 400.

91 octane fpgreen equipped 8's and 9's do approx 325-345whp on this dyno, depending on mod level.

Keep in mind this is "sane" boost, not the 30+ psi I see others doing, not that 30+ is a bad thing, but this guy tracks and autox's this car so I felt 28+ would be pushing it.

There is more left in it if it was a more aggressive tune. The tubular header added a bunch of lag to the car but I'm sure it isn't a big deal with the power being what it is.

Oh, the car only weighs 26XXlbs without driver. Rocket for sure.


Last edited by razorlab; Feb 4, 2008 at 11:08 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 10:58 PM
  #2  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Peak tq that late? Interesting.

Good numbers must be a blasttt.

Scorke
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 11:00 PM
  #3  
RazorLab's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by scorke
Peak tq that late? Interesting.

Good numbers must be a blasttt.

Scorke
Yea the megan style tubular headers added a bunch of lag (about 300-400rpm) which I found a little odd.

He might be going back to the stock (ported) exhaust manifold here soon.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 11:03 PM
  #4  
SixOneNine's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Chula Vista, CA
Great #'s.

A ported stock exhaust and intake mani > megan headers
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 12:18 AM
  #5  
RickU's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: LA
26xx pounds wow that's light. Would you happen to have any pictures of the car?
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 06:44 AM
  #6  
OKIX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: OKC
26XXlbs!! thats light..... What has been done for the weight reductions? Is it an RS? Very curious. This has to be fully stripped and gutted.

Last edited by OKIX; Feb 5, 2008 at 07:17 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 07:27 AM
  #7  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by OKIX
26XXlbs!! thats light..... What has been done for the weight reductions? Is it an RS? Very curious. This has to be fully stripped and gutted.
Because your car is heavier?

Scorke
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 07:39 AM
  #8  
TeStUdO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 41
From: Secret Tweaker Pad
What was the A/F on the 110 if you don't mind me asking?
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 07:48 AM
  #9  
OKIX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: OKC
Originally Posted by scorke
Because your car is heavier?

Scorke
ya, my car is light as well. Curious to see if this car is caged too and what all has been done to it to lighten it. Because my car weighed 2880lbs without driver. however I do have roll bar, AC, speakers, etc...
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 09:06 AM
  #10  
tmaxxman21's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Concord NH
thats good on that dyno. kinda makes me want one over a bigger turbo
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 09:13 AM
  #11  
20Grockit's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
From: wilmington, NC
wow thats good numbers to be on a mustang dyno. im pretty impressed by it. im in the process of doing my build with a green w/ forge actuator, jun 272/272 combo with springs and type 1 retainers, ble lifters and new stem seals and seat locators. the rest of my mods are in my sig. cant wait to see what i put down when i get done.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 10:03 AM
  #12  
ExViTermini's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 13
From: Virginia
What brand of fuel was this? Great tq curve...little late as stated but it holds out well for a bit...
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #13  
9sec9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma
Nice job razorlab. The torque is nice and flat for 1200+ rpms. Did you find the S1's better for the autox? Just curious since I figured the S2's would make more up top, but you may not be needing power on the top end. Anyway, again, good job.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 10:28 AM
  #14  
mplspilot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 1
From: Flyover country.
Congrats on breaking the 400! Now do it for your car
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #15  
Freddy302's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 644
Likes: 3
From: CT
Great power for what looks like a very conservative tune!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:59 PM.