Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

BorgWarner S256 Dyno Results!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 03:57 PM
  #16  
Exciting News's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 844
Likes: 1
From: local area man
Originally Posted by Keith-PURE Tuning
Procams 260 / 11.5
Don't reckon you know the effective duration on them do you?

Cheers to using "out of the ordinary" parts on the cars.

Also, is this a "low-reading" dyno?
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 05:28 PM
  #17  
Keith-PURE Tuning's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
From: Toledo
Originally Posted by Exciting News
Don't reckon you know the effective duration on them do you?

Cheers to using "out of the ordinary" parts on the cars.

Also, is this a "low-reading" dyno?

When I get to work tomorrow I'll look for the specs when we built the motor. I can't remember it off the top of my head.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 08:59 AM
  #18  
MadMsheen's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
Congrats. The graphs look very fun.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 01:54 PM
  #19  
VIPGarage's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, VA
another awesome S256. Good job guys.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 04:37 PM
  #20  
Exciting News's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 844
Likes: 1
From: local area man
Originally Posted by Keith-PURE Tuning
When I get to work tomorrow I'll look for the specs when we built the motor. I can't remember it off the top of my head.

Bump for more info. Sorry to go crazy on you man, but damn near nobody runs these cams. Information is scarce!

Some questions about the 2.0 liter:

Stock head?
Stock block?
Tuned on stock ECU?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 01:53 PM
  #21  
Keith-PURE Tuning's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
From: Toledo
Originally Posted by Exciting News
Bump for more info. Sorry to go crazy on you man, but damn near nobody runs these cams. Information is scarce!

Some questions about the 2.0 liter:

Stock head?
Stock block?
Tuned on stock ECU?
I have the customers file on my desk i just haven't had time to go through it yet to find the cam specs you request.

As for the other questions...
Pure Spec C Cylinder Head
Pure Spec A Short Block
AEM EMS
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 03:26 PM
  #22  
Keith-PURE Tuning's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
From: Toledo
Measured Duration @1mm is 215
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 03:45 PM
  #23  
Exciting News's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 844
Likes: 1
From: local area man
Originally Posted by Keith-PURE Tuning
Measured Duration @1mm is 215
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2008 | 01:15 PM
  #24  
Talonboost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Redmond Washington
Thanks Keith, this is some really good testing. I appreciate it.

Yes the Mustang dyno reads low according to most people. Especially when compared to Dynojet.

Gary

Last edited by Talonboost; Mar 1, 2008 at 04:22 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2008 | 05:37 AM
  #25  
ceegutta's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: nyc
2.3L dyno looks very peaky!!! That's alot of lag wow!

I wonder if using a TS housing on the turbo with a TS mani on the 2.3l car would have made a nicer difference overall?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2008 | 06:21 AM
  #26  
Keith-PURE Tuning's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
From: Toledo
Originally Posted by ceegutta
2.3L dyno looks very peaky!!! That's alot of lag wow!

I wonder if using a TS housing on the turbo with a TS mani on the 2.3l car would have made a nicer difference overall?
As I mentioned before the lag is from the cams the customer wanted to use! They are one of the most aggressive cam sets offered for the evo.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #27  
Keith-PURE Tuning's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
From: Toledo
Image of the 2.0L engine bay.

We just took the car in for some other engine work and I'll post the dyno numbers when we are finished.

Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 08:12 PM
  #28  
Talonboost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Redmond Washington
Very Purdy!
Looks like the compressor covers are still available polished, which is nice, and should reflect some of the heat from the exhaust manifold.

Who made the exhaust manifold?

Gary

Last edited by Talonboost; Mar 14, 2008 at 08:15 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 11:32 PM
  #29  
ONRAILS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
the E85 will cause some later spool also
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 08:49 AM
  #30  
Keith-PURE Tuning's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
From: Toledo
The manifold is from Full-Race.

Yes the EGT's are a little cooler with any form of Alcohol. The E85, big cams and the .70ar on the 2.3L caused the difference in spool. All the little differences add up fast, but the car did make good power with some head room to spare. Could have turned up the boost to 30-32psi and the number would have been around 550whp, but we ran out of time that day and the customer was happy with 500whp.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:53 PM.