Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

BorgWarner S256 Dyno Results!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 03:36 PM
  #1  
Keith-PURE Tuning's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
From: Toledo
BorgWarner S256 Dyno Results!

Borg Warner S256 Dyno Results.

Test were performed at Pure Tuning on Mustang Dynamometer MD-1100-AWD-SE.

Dyno Graph 1
Car: 2003 Evo 8
Engine: 2.0L
Fuel: 93 octane
Turbo: Borg Warner S256 / Open T3 .55ar Stainless Turbine Housing
Intake Manifold: Magnus (Street)
Cams: Tomei Pro 260 / 11.5ex, 11.5in
Max Boost: 22psi @ 4500rpm
Atmospheric Temp: 92Deg
Relative Humidity: 2.7%


Dyno Graph 2
Car:2004 Evo 8
Engine: 2.3L
Fuel: E85 octane
Turbo: Borg Warner S256 / Open T3 .70ar Turbine Housing
Intake Manifold: HKS Kansai
Cams: Crane 280 / 12ex , 12in
Max Boost: 23psi @ 4800rpm / 26psi @ 5000rpm
Atmospheric Temp: 77Deg
Relative Humidity: 22%

Last edited by Keith-PURE Tuning; Feb 26, 2008 at 03:51 PM. Reason: Enter Cam Specs & Turbine Scroll
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #2  
justboosted02's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 14
From: northeast
nice numbers, looks like a monster street turbo
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #3  
YellowEvilEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Sykesville, MD
on the second car, you can probably attribute 50 awhp to that 1700 dollar intake :-)
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 12:15 AM
  #4  
chuntington101's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: UK
need some pics of the setups now!

Chris.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 12:18 AM
  #5  
EvoKnievo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
From: W SUNSET & PCH
wow, pretty good spool for those numbers.

Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 01:37 AM
  #6  
ONRAILS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
wow, that really shows the difference in intakes huh. I wonder how much more power the first car would've made with a stock one
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 07:42 AM
  #7  
shivaswrath's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: Norwalk, CT
pictures of it installed?

where can one acquire such a turbo?
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 07:55 AM
  #8  
thatsMR2u's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
where these twin scroll or the bullseye t3 single scroll
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 08:00 AM
  #9  
FullOutPwr's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Willard, MO 65781
Originally Posted by shivaswrath
where can one acquire such a turbo?

Right from their website. Click Me
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 08:10 AM
  #10  
mrdevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Ct
Did the housing really add that much lag despite having a 2.3l? Full spool went from 4500 to 4800 with a 2.3l, bigger housing, and intake manifold.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 08:12 AM
  #11  
mitsuboost30's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: pa
Awesome cant wait to get my BW on the dyno...
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 10:13 AM
  #12  
Exciting News's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 844
Likes: 1
From: local area man
Originally Posted by mrdevo
Did the housing really add that much lag despite having a 2.3l? Full spool went from 4500 to 4800 with a 2.3l, bigger housing, and intake manifold.

Thought the same thing. I figured the increased displacement would have offset the the housing and intake manifold size increase. Second chart looks a little peaky.

I like the first setup more.


My guess is that it's an open housing.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 02:57 PM
  #13  
Keith-PURE Tuning's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
From: Toledo
The .70ar hotside caused a little of the later spool on the 2.3, but I did forget to put the cam info in the specs. The 2.3L was running some 280 Crane Cams and the 2.0L was running a set of 260 Tomei Cams which is the real reason for the difference in spool.

I'll have to look for pics of the two cars. Not sure if I took any?

Both turbos where standard open T3 turbine inlet.

I'll edit the specs to include the info you guys have brought up.

I'll say that the 2.0L reved crazy fast through the power band. I thought it reved fast on the dyno when I tuned it, but when I took it to the street, third gear is completely unusable because you run into traffic fast when 100mph comes in 2-3seconds.

Thanks for looking

Last edited by Keith-PURE Tuning; Feb 26, 2008 at 03:05 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 03:28 PM
  #14  
Exciting News's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 844
Likes: 1
From: local area man
Originally Posted by Keith-PURE Tuning
The .70ar hotside caused a little of the later spool on the 2.3, but I did forget to put the cam info in the specs. The 2.3L was running some 280 Crane Cams and the 2.0L was running a set of 260 Tomei Cams which is the real reason for the difference in spool.
Which Tomeis?
PonCams (low lift) or ProCams (high lift)? They both come advertised as 260.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 03:52 PM
  #15  
Keith-PURE Tuning's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
From: Toledo
Originally Posted by Exciting News
Which Tomeis?
PonCams (low lift) or ProCams (high lift)? They both come advertised as 260.
Procams 260 / 11.5
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:59 PM.