M3 Cams Results

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Apr 2, 2008 | 08:45 PM

#61

Nuked

Evolving Member

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 374

Likes: 0

From: Morgantown, WV

Quote:

Originally Posted by StreetLegal66

How is this good result when the car is making less HP than the previous set of Tomei PON cams? I remember reading a post on this same car that made 430whp on 26psi; with the M3 cams, it's making 413whp on 28psi and the spool up is much much later...

Do u guys actually analyze these results or just glance at it and say "whorray!!!" ??

Something is definitely not right with this car... check vacuum leak my friend

Either that or the dyno is not reading right

Read the whole post, they mentioned that the dyno is not reading correctly and the two different pulls data is flawed for back to back comparison.

SQ

Apr 2, 2008 | 09:02 PM

#62

StreetLegal66

Newbie

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 16

Likes: 0

From: LA!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nuked

Read the whole post, they mentioned that the dyno is not reading correctly and the two different pulls data is flawed for back to back comparison.

SQ

So what did the car made before on the Tomei Cams and with 100% meth? We probably don't know b/c the dyno numbers from before were not 'reliable'... so we have nothing to compare the M3 results to

Apr 2, 2008 | 09:29 PM

#63

LilRico

Evolved Member

iTrader: (21)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 1,848

Likes: 0

From: Cut throat, Orlando

looked at the dyno type...

Last edited by LilRico; Apr 2, 2008 at 09:51 PM.

Apr 2, 2008 | 09:35 PM

#64

RyuEvoIX

Evolved Member

iTrader: (10)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 2,126

Likes: 1

From: Florida

Quote:

Originally Posted by LilRico

Not for nothing, but I do find the results very low. With stock motor, M2 cossi cams, Buschur stages 1-4, and 50/50 meth at 29.5 PSI my car did 415HP and 434 TQ. I just don't understand why this car is making that little power when he has a 30R and I had the stock turbo. Something is not right. I'm in no way bashing or anything, I promise, but I would have expected the numbers to be higher then that.... Like 450 or 475...

He does, however, keep making power after the 5252 mark, so that's a good thing, but man... a 30R...

Different dyno's= apples to oranges

Apr 2, 2008 | 09:50 PM

#65

LilRico

Evolved Member

iTrader: (21)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 1,848

Likes: 0

From: Cut throat, Orlando

Quote:

Originally Posted by RyuEvoIX

Different dyno's= apples to oranges

You know what you're right... I stand corrected..

Apr 2, 2008 | 09:52 PM

#66

RyuEvoIX

Evolved Member

iTrader: (10)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 2,126

Likes: 1

From: Florida

Quote:

Originally Posted by LilRico

You know what you're right... I stand corrected..

Wish I was wrong though, would make comparisons much less complicated.

Apr 2, 2008 | 10:07 PM

#67

LilRico

Evolved Member

iTrader: (21)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 1,848

Likes: 0

From: Cut throat, Orlando

Quote:

Originally Posted by RyuEvoIX

Wish I was wrong though, would make comparisons much less complicated.

I hear you.. Wish there would only be one type of dyno and one standard. I think it would make everything a lot easier, but what can you do

... Oh wells....

Back on topic...

Apr 2, 2008 | 11:38 PM

#68

dxbevo9

Evolved Member

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 2,723

Likes: 0

From: Dubai, U.A.E.

Quote:

Originally Posted by StreetLegal66

Something is definitely not right with this car... check vacuum leak my friend

Either that or the dyno is not reading right

bro..are you retarded or what? seems to me that you are the one who is not reading the posts...mitch posted that his load cell cable were messed up resulting in non consistant and far from reality readings...nevertheless...the owner of the car, as well as mitch, felt a huge difference on their butt dyno..

go figure..

Apr 3, 2008 | 02:03 AM

#69

ONRAILS

Evolved Member

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 841

Likes: 0

From: Kentucky

+1 on something wrong with this car. It should not be tapering. My 50trim doesn't taper on a bigger motor and more boost.

Apr 3, 2008 | 11:09 AM

#70

RyuEvoIX

Evolved Member

iTrader: (10)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 2,126

Likes: 1

From: Florida

Any update on the stock turbo car results with the M3's?

Apr 3, 2008 | 12:14 PM

#71

Magnumpsi

Thread Starter

Evolved Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 1,045

Likes: 0

From: Who Knows

I am here. The car is on the dyno now. Should be done in a hour or so and I will have results.

Sorry I am so behind with the dyno down last week so I am just trying to get caught up.

It will be done soon I promise.

Mitch

Apr 3, 2008 | 12:24 PM

#72

Ambiguous

Evolving Member

Joined: Jul 2007

Posts: 193

Likes: 0

From: West Chester, OHIO

Cant wait for these results!

Apr 3, 2008 | 12:26 PM

#73

Magnumpsi

Thread Starter

Evolved Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 1,045

Likes: 0

From: Who Knows

Scanning the dyno sheet in right now.

Mitch

Apr 3, 2008 | 12:37 PM

#74

Magnumpsi

Thread Starter

Evolved Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 1,045

Likes: 0

From: Who Knows

Ok finally lol......

I apologize for having everyone waiting. I have been so backed up from the dyno being down a week that I have spent more time tuning than sleeping.

This is a good close comparison and I am glad it was on Evans car cause we have a ton of runs for his car so we had a lot to compare with.

Power is a little low but that is just how my dyno reads. That is why the other results were low but the car pulls like hell.

I like these cams a lot and I think that they are a little aggresive but worth it.

Again sorry for keeping everyone on edge certainly not my intention.

Thanks,
Mitch Mckee