Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

EVOLUNCHBOX's build, big power.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2008 | 10:52 AM
  #31  
GTVEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 0
From: Ozark, MO
Man 600+ on pump on that dyno is really really impressive, great job guys on your results and build.
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 11:28 AM
  #32  
LilRico's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
From: Cut throat, Orlando
Originally Posted by vwjeff
FOCK
+1... I said the same thing!
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #33  
JVELA's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: PR
Damn David you are sick. Congrats to Buschur racing and the owner of that 93 oct beast.
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 03:50 PM
  #34  
phat's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
What were the changes from the last time on the dyno other than the fuel and intake? Was the old intake an AMS unit?
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 06:45 PM
  #35  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Changes from last time other than the weight savings and roll cage were:

We went from VP Import to Q16 (that will lose power), Hypertune intake with 3" throttle body and just additional tuning. Yes, the intake last time was the AMS with our 65 mm throttle body on it.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 09:03 AM
  #36  
JC evo1's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Changes from last time other than the weight savings and roll cage were:

We went from VP Import to Q16 (that will lose power), Hypertune intake with 3" throttle body and just additional tuning. Yes, the intake last time was the AMS with our 65 mm throttle body on it.
whats the drivability like with the 65mm TB compared to a 3"?
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 09:42 AM
  #37  
Whoop_ass's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: on earth
awesome job Dave i knew there was a reason i went with a 2.3
600 on 93 octane ...OMG!

any news on that 4088 build you guys busy with?

interesting to see how it compares to this in terms of spool and power...
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 10:54 AM
  #38  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
So far the 4088 is a real disapointment. We are changing a few things on that particular car though and going to see if we can get it to come around. It's under 400 right now on pump gas. 20 psi is at 5,000 rpm.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 10:55 AM
  #39  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
I think the driveability is better with the 65mm throttle body, the throttle isn't as touchy and the idle air control is best.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 11:07 AM
  #40  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
wow, that car is going to be crazy fast lunchbox... congrats to you and DB for making it scream.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #41  
apagan01's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (299)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,863
Likes: 5
From: digging for oil
A long time ago Mr, David Buschur has become the Senior Scientist in this field.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
David Buschur
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
157
Sep 17, 2020 06:33 PM
EVOlunchbox
For Sale - Cars For Sale
9
Feb 2, 2016 08:20 AM
vwjeff
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
80
Sep 4, 2009 01:27 PM
David Buschur
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
262
Sep 25, 2008 06:41 AM
David Buschur
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
302
Aug 2, 2008 03:28 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:29 PM.