I think people get carried away with horsepower numbers(330whp stock evo9 on mustang dyno ya right lol)...what your making sounds right to me....330whp with cams sounds about right..and that is fast as hell..all dynos are different...you need to go to the strip to prove what you've got.

Evo 8 & 9 both put down like 240-250whp on a REAL mustang so the 70whp in mods sounds right to me..

 

Dude El Producto....did you not read what the OP said.....he is talking about DYNOJET

320 on a dynojet can happen with very little mods.

I can post tons of graphs of NorCal Evo 9's with ZERO modification, just a tune and they can make 260-270 whp on a mustang. Now that is about 300 whp DJ, with ZERO...and yes I mean ZERO mods.


The link below are stock or stockish 9's with tunes on 91 with a mustang dyno that reads bone stock cars about 230-235 for a bone stock evo9

http://www.norcalevo.net/forum/index...c,20045.0.html

 

Ok, so I went to the track and ran 12.68 with 1.78 (I know not the best) with a trap speed of 106. My best trap speed was 109. Anyways I checked for boost leaks again when I got home and it is leaking from the shaft on the throttle body.... How do I fix that? New intake manifold and Tb? Lol.

 

No just get some MILSPEC or WORKS TB seals. Its about 30 bucks for a set. Someone has to install for you though, which will more than likely cost more than the parts. But that should help you.

Also, buy a boost leak tester for like 30 bucks so you can be sure that next time you tune, its not with a leak. Theres nothing worse than paying for a tune and having low numbers because you didn't leak test it.

 

the number is kind of low i think u should get at least 350whp on the dyno jet,because the do read higher then all other dyno.

 

I have a boost leak tester. I checked b4 and I didn't realize how much it was leaking. I checked this time and pressured it up to 25psi and it was coming out pretty good.

Would I be able to do the seal install? I changed my own clutch...... It couldn't be any worse than that could it? Lol.

 

BC Cams lose power thats new to me???????

 

Nah they are not too bad

 

I highly doubt the cams are the issue.... If you'd like me to check things out shoot me an email with two 3rd gear logs and your map.. If I see anything off I'll let you know and its your choice from there.

Cheers!

 

You shouldn't expect much on 91oct in 90+-degree weather.

 

320 is still much much less than it should be even in the worst conditions...

He needs to find out first if its a mechanical or tuning issue first, then correct the problem.

 

It's just 23 psi in hot weather with 91oct. Check first to be sure there was a 1.03-1.05 CF due to heat, because if so, then it's really 300-310whp, which is a concern. If it's 320whp uncorrected, then it's pretty good for those conditions.

I am not as inclined to think these numbers are that bad. I happen to be fond of 325whp myself.

 

Yea I wouldnt think so most numbers ive seen I see put them on par with the HKS's at half the price.

I need a retune here too Tamer changed a couple things in my set up.

 

I had similar power mods on my old Evo VIII and made 320whp/311tq on a dynojet three years ago at 98 degrees. Boost was set to 21psi. I had HKS 272s, EBC FMIC, TBE, LICP, UICP, intake, fuel pump. I had stock injectors, stock ex mani, VIII turbo with 10.5 hotside, no 02 housing and a turbo trix tune on 93 octane.

I'm listing this for your comparison. My car was very average in power at the time.

 

Well that makes me feel better about the lower numbers........ I'm talking with mil.spec about shaft seals. I was going to order Works, but eric said they were coming out with their own next week. So I am going to try those out. That should stop any boost leak and power loss. I wouldn't mind putting it back on the dyno after that. With my mods what kind of 1/4 mile time should I be getting? Average driver. 12.0-12.5?