Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

AMS 2.3RR GT850R CNC Race head Test!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 09:15 AM
  #1  
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
AMS 2.3RR GT850R CNC Race head Test!!!

Today we had a chance to do a back to back test against our already well performing AMS ported race head compared to our new AMS CNC Ported Race head. The results were GREAT!

Quoted from our tuner Chris Black:

"Excellent Results From The New AMS CNC Head!!

Jared brought his car back to us solely for the addition of the new AMS CNC head and a re-tune on 93oct pump gas. Ivan strapped the head on the car and I had an opportunity to get it on the dyno last night. The results are very impressive to say the least. The only thing changed on the car was the head. Everything else was left exactly the same. "


A few details:

AMS 850R kit
AMS Standard FMIC!!
AMS Intake Manifold

No other changes made at all
93oct pump gas
23.5 PSI



For those of you that like chewing on hard data, Here is the difference in Fueling at 23 psi.


Crazy results going from our current high performing ported head to our new CNC Ported head!
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 09:25 AM
  #2  
hellcat's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: Houston Texas
That's a healthy increase!
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 09:33 AM
  #3  
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
yeah, 540 whp on only 23.5 psi is pretty damn impressive too.

Eric
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 09:41 AM
  #4  
4g63smokinall4s's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (64)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte,NC
Wow Great numbers period!
23.5psi Holy ****!
What a difference that head made! Great Job AMS!!!

Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 09:44 AM
  #5  
justboosted02's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 14
From: northeast
Nice!
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 09:48 AM
  #6  
ForcedPerformance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
If I have a regular AMS race head, can I send it back for credit on a new CNC one?

( get this question all the time about turobs )
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 10:00 AM
  #7  
mrdevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Ct
Just curious what happened at 6400rpms? The gains look great everywhere..
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #8  
MR Turco's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 3
From: Massachusetts
Great results. Hopefully something will come through the shop and you can do a similar test on a milder build.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 11:12 AM
  #9  
LT1runner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Nashville Metro
what percentage gain in CFM do you guys think you've gained from a stock head? Can you post the port flow numbers per port?
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 01:18 PM
  #10  
sem23tex's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Chitown
Holy crap! I'm impressed. I guess I need to change my signature.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 01:40 PM
  #11  
sem23tex's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Chitown
Changed my signature. Good numbers coming from AMS 850Rs.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #12  
PATRICK B.'s Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 1
From: CALIFORNIA
Originally Posted by mrdevo
Just curious what happened at 6400rpms? The gains look great everywhere..
Nice stuff AMS

Does this car have MIVEC?
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 03:32 PM
  #13  
Chris@AMS's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: West Chicago, IL
The dip that around 6400 rpms was a slight falter in the mivec control during that run, which also caused the boost to vary slightly, and subsequently the fueling and timing. Nothing to be worried about
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 03:41 PM
  #14  
1BAMF's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: STL
Great Job Chris! And the rest of the crew at AMS for a well built beast.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 03:44 PM
  #15  
1BAMF's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: STL
Here is a quick question.... Now had this been jsut a standard 2.3 what kind of power differences could we expect?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:54 AM.