Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Anyone using new version 2 of Titek O2 housing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 09:48 AM
  #1  
racer135's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 1
From: Puerto Rico
Anyone using new version 2 of Titek O2 housing?

Have anyone tried the new version of the TiTek O2 housing? It looks like a nice unit. Welds looks really good and the inside apperars to be one big area just like the works one. No separation of the walls like the regular SS units. Heres a link.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh....php?p=6268406

I am just looking for some feedback on it. I will be buying an O2 soon.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 06:29 PM
  #2  
I4UnderPressure's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 410
Likes: 1
From: New Lenox, IL
+1, I too would like to know the experiences. Just a hair away from buying it.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2008 | 06:32 PM
  #3  
1NASTYIXMR's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Md
Im also interested in this. It just came out so im sure no one has it yet.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 06:01 PM
  #4  
I4UnderPressure's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 410
Likes: 1
From: New Lenox, IL
guess I'll have to be the first test dummy?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 07:53 PM
  #5  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
No thanks to the one large cavity instead of having them separated. That is just asking for additional turbulence if you ask me. I'll keep my Megan-style coated o2 housing from Buschur.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 09:07 PM
  #6  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
It is a very nicely fabricated piece.... no one can deny that.

do you have a price?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 09:38 PM
  #7  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by S2kracka
No thanks to the one large cavity instead of having them separated. That is just asking for additional turbulence if you ask me. I'll keep my Megan-style coated o2 housing from Buschur.
I agree. Until I see a dyno proven increase in performance with the v2 over the v1, I'm sticking with buying a v1.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 08:39 AM
  #8  
racer135's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 1
From: Puerto Rico
I heard from someone that changed from the ebay/Megan one to the Titek type that the new one is a better unit. Quoting him "got rid of my old megan racing POS ebay housing"
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 08:52 AM
  #9  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by racer135
I heard from someone that changed from the ebay/Megan one to the Titek type that the new one is a better unit. Quoting him "got rid of my old megan racing POS ebay housing"
The Megan is definitely not as well constructed, but divorced WG flow is a proven means to increase performance. My guess is that the v2 design is more a product of an attempt to reduce manufacturing cost than it is to improve performance.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 03:20 PM
  #10  
Lowness's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Texas
The O2 housing is beautiful. too bad they didn't divorce the WG flow. I hope they did some testing to justify this new design.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #11  
Sxhawnn's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
The works is undivided and has been proven to make some very nice gains
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 03:28 PM
  #12  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Sxhawnn
The works is undivided and has been proven to make some very nice gains
You're kidding, right? Its been shown on several occasions to provide lower gains than any of the aftermarket divorced WG O2s.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 03:49 PM
  #13  
JDMevoBOOST's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco
The evoX stock o2 is also undivided
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #14  
Sxhawnn's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mrfred
You're kidding, right? Its been shown on several occasions to provide lower gains than any of the aftermarket divorced WG O2s.
Can you show me the tests? I haven't seen them.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #15  
1NASTYIXMR's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Md
It would not make no sence to make a new version and not be better.
But i do want to see some proof.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:43 AM.