Bosch 1000cc injectors on an Evo
I'm all setup for logging fuel pressure with a Kavlico sensor threaded into the fuel rail. I've actually had it ready for quite a few months, but haven't taken the time to get some shutdown logs. I guess I'll start on that tomorrow.
It would seem odd if vapor lock was causing the issue. Why these injectors and not the stock injectors?
It would seem odd if vapor lock was causing the issue. Why these injectors and not the stock injectors?
***Crazy Idea worth thinking about ****
Might the fuel vaporize inside of this style injector and cause it to (lock closed...or malfunction) unlike the factory injector. This wouldn't be present with aftermarket ECU's due to their (possible) high output injector drivers that can overcome with (lockout or malfunction)
*** end crazy idea ***
I suppose I could test my idea by inverting the rail as I had suggested earlier.
These are high impedance injector. The amount of current drawn when the circuit is completed is a function of the resistance of the circuit and battery voltage. The drivers in an aftermarket ecu shouldn't function any differently than any of the aftermarket ecus.
As far as I know, there are no weird chambers or anything in the injector. With the EV14 injectors, they're very big and open most of the way down. You can see all the way down to the internal filter basket assembly right by the coil. I can't imagine there's anything tricky below that. I can confirm with Paul though, as he's had plenty of them apart.
As far as I know, there are no weird chambers or anything in the injector. With the EV14 injectors, they're very big and open most of the way down. You can see all the way down to the internal filter basket assembly right by the coil. I can't imagine there's anything tricky below that. I can confirm with Paul though, as he's had plenty of them apart.
That's what keeps leading me back to thinking it's ecu related. That and the fact that the guys with aftermarket ecus don't seem to be having the same problem. That's me assuming based on not hearing anything of it, does anyone know of anyone with these issues with an EMS or something?
You guys have also noticed differences in this when using different fuels, right? E85 and gas? Not that it points in one direction more than the other, but something to consider. Obviously different boiling point in the different fuels as well as different fuel flow requirements.
You guys have also noticed differences in this when using different fuels, right? E85 and gas? Not that it points in one direction more than the other, but something to consider. Obviously different boiling point in the different fuels as well as different fuel flow requirements.
I have the problem on both fuels - E85 is more bearable, but both the issue is apparent - especially compared to when I got in danl's car after 30 min and his fired up without even a hiccup.
Maybe a shot in the dark, but can someone with the problem borrow an AEM EMS and see if the problem persists? If I had an EVO EMS in stock i'd send it out to one of you guys, but i don't. Since I don't have an AWD dyno here, I do very little EVO tuning. If I had one, i'd probably be able to be of a lot more help.
I dont see how its ecu related. It starts fine in 5 minute window. no setting in ecu changes after 20 minutes that would make it not start after that. this is my 5th set of injectors in this car. first set that give me hard start problem. as a mechanic the first question I ask people when they have an issue is "what was last change to your car?" only thing I have changed is injectors. I reserved judgment till I had good access to latency tables. I was hoping it would be simple latency adjustment. but that doesnt do a thing toward helping the issue here. the only thing left that no one seems to have checked is whether the injector is leaking down or not. I tried clamping fuel feed and return today. after 20 minutes no start. I am positive its not heat related. the injector remains almost cool to the touch.
If he is ok with that we could try it?......might be a couple weeks till were both back in our hometown.
Here is my current latency values: These are the values of the table in ecuflash regarding battery v.
Scaling: 812
4.69v = 5.328
7.03v = 3.144
9.38v = 1.992
11.72v = 1.368
14.06v = 1.008
16.41v = .792
18.68v = .624
Low Trim = -0.2
Mid Trim = -2.1
That was after 4 days of driving...
I started with danl's latencies which he calculated in excel - I had to reduce by 15% to get my trims in check vs. his. I took the 15% off each volt to keep the same curve - I was unable to run danl's latencies.
My scaling at one time was 886 the same as dans - but since adding my short licp and uicp my scaling has reduced to 812 to get my trims in check.
Here is my current latency values: These are the values of the table in ecuflash regarding battery v.
Scaling: 812
4.69v = 5.328
7.03v = 3.144
9.38v = 1.992
11.72v = 1.368
14.06v = 1.008
16.41v = .792
18.68v = .624
Low Trim = -0.2
Mid Trim = -2.1
That was after 4 days of driving...
I started with danl's latencies which he calculated in excel - I had to reduce by 15% to get my trims in check vs. his. I took the 15% off each volt to keep the same curve - I was unable to run danl's latencies.
My scaling at one time was 886 the same as dans - but since adding my short licp and uicp my scaling has reduced to 812 to get my trims in check.
but no idea why the evo is such a *****.
I'm going to log a bunch of temps tonight and hopefully take a video.
I'll be back on Evom around 8-9pm to continue our discussion!
I'll have to post up my settings I'm at 790cc
Low Trim = -2.00
Mid Trim = 0.49
after 1000 miles of driving.
I'll be back on Evom around 8-9pm to continue our discussion!
I'll have to post up my settings I'm at 790cc
Low Trim = -2.00
Mid Trim = 0.49
after 1000 miles of driving.
Not sure if this has been mentioned yet in this thread but I have had a couple Evo 10's with these injectors, with the same warm start issues as well...
both moved to deatschwerks 1000cc's and no mo' problems.
One of them was on E85 and had no warm start issues with E85 but did on 91.
- Bryan
both moved to deatschwerks 1000cc's and no mo' problems.
One of them was on E85 and had no warm start issues with E85 but did on 91.
- Bryan
Last edited by GST Motorsports; Oct 27, 2009 at 04:36 PM.
Yes - It does start somewhat faster with the throttle at 100% at least it did on e85 - 93 octane I am not noticing the same thing. But when adjusting my tables I cant take much more fuel out or the car wont fire. Actually the table that takes over cranking after the initial pulse I am the lowest it will go other than 0 which I tried and the car just cranks, wont fire. My inital pulse I had it at 0 on top of that....?
I have done a lot of adjustments within the ecu with no luck....I am currently on 93 octane for the season, due to the winter months.
is there anyone who had this hard start issue and solved it by changing the latency tables?
Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Oct 27, 2009 at 07:26 PM.


