Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Bosch 1000cc injectors on an Evo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 12:28 PM
  #166  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
Originally Posted by mrfred
I'm all setup for logging fuel pressure with a Kavlico sensor threaded into the fuel rail. I've actually had it ready for quite a few months, but haven't taken the time to get some shutdown logs. I guess I'll start on that tomorrow.

It would seem odd if vapor lock was causing the issue. Why these injectors and not the stock injectors?
I don't know about tony's injectors or the stock ones... But the diesel injectors that I deal with have several chambers inside the injector with spill valves and other weird channels. If the fuel is removed from the inlet of the injector fuel is still present in the inside of the injector (in the body)

***Crazy Idea worth thinking about ****
Might the fuel vaporize inside of this style injector and cause it to (lock closed...or malfunction) unlike the factory injector. This wouldn't be present with aftermarket ECU's due to their (possible) high output injector drivers that can overcome with (lockout or malfunction)
*** end crazy idea ***

I suppose I could test my idea by inverting the rail as I had suggested earlier.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 01:16 PM
  #167  
Tony1's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
These are high impedance injector. The amount of current drawn when the circuit is completed is a function of the resistance of the circuit and battery voltage. The drivers in an aftermarket ecu shouldn't function any differently than any of the aftermarket ecus.

As far as I know, there are no weird chambers or anything in the injector. With the EV14 injectors, they're very big and open most of the way down. You can see all the way down to the internal filter basket assembly right by the coil. I can't imagine there's anything tricky below that. I can confirm with Paul though, as he's had plenty of them apart.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 01:26 PM
  #168  
travman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by Tony1
That's what keeps leading me back to thinking it's ecu related. That and the fact that the guys with aftermarket ecus don't seem to be having the same problem. That's me assuming based on not hearing anything of it, does anyone know of anyone with these issues with an EMS or something?

You guys have also noticed differences in this when using different fuels, right? E85 and gas? Not that it points in one direction more than the other, but something to consider. Obviously different boiling point in the different fuels as well as different fuel flow requirements.
I swapped in another ecu into my car and I have played with every start-up table that is defined as well as messed with the latency values at the lower voltages, increasing and decreasing - I cant even get it to make a change to the fact of 'hey im onto something here" its like shooting in the dark. I even switched to speed density and re-tuned the car to rule out MAF issues...

I have the problem on both fuels - E85 is more bearable, but both the issue is apparent - especially compared to when I got in danl's car after 30 min and his fired up without even a hiccup.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 01:48 PM
  #169  
Tony1's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Maybe a shot in the dark, but can someone with the problem borrow an AEM EMS and see if the problem persists? If I had an EVO EMS in stock i'd send it out to one of you guys, but i don't. Since I don't have an AWD dyno here, I do very little EVO tuning. If I had one, i'd probably be able to be of a lot more help.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 02:07 PM
  #170  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
IDEA!

Travman,
Swap cam position sensors with Dan.

Last edited by R/TErnie; Oct 27, 2009 at 02:09 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #171  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
I dont see how its ecu related. It starts fine in 5 minute window. no setting in ecu changes after 20 minutes that would make it not start after that. this is my 5th set of injectors in this car. first set that give me hard start problem. as a mechanic the first question I ask people when they have an issue is "what was last change to your car?" only thing I have changed is injectors. I reserved judgment till I had good access to latency tables. I was hoping it would be simple latency adjustment. but that doesnt do a thing toward helping the issue here. the only thing left that no one seems to have checked is whether the injector is leaking down or not. I tried clamping fuel feed and return today. after 20 minutes no start. I am positive its not heat related. the injector remains almost cool to the touch.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #172  
Tony1's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
So how do you explain 1 car doing it and one car not and swapping injectors makes no difference at all?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 03:34 PM
  #173  
travman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
IDEA!

Travman,
Swap cam position sensors with Dan.
If he is ok with that we could try it?......might be a couple weeks till were both back in our hometown.

Here is my current latency values: These are the values of the table in ecuflash regarding battery v.

Scaling: 812

4.69v = 5.328
7.03v = 3.144
9.38v = 1.992
11.72v = 1.368
14.06v = 1.008
16.41v = .792
18.68v = .624

Low Trim = -0.2
Mid Trim = -2.1

That was after 4 days of driving...

I started with danl's latencies which he calculated in excel - I had to reduce by 15% to get my trims in check vs. his. I took the 15% off each volt to keep the same curve - I was unable to run danl's latencies.

My scaling at one time was 886 the same as dans - but since adding my short licp and uicp my scaling has reduced to 812 to get my trims in check.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 03:35 PM
  #174  
travman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by Tony1
So how do you explain 1 car doing it and one car not and swapping injectors makes no difference at all?
Not to mention a set that did not work in my car worked in the car that his ID1000's work fine........this is what has myself and danl baffled, among others. Plus the chances of getting (2) bad sets of injectors in a row has to be extremely rare when there are more being sold to honda and subie guys with no reported issues from there stall.

but no idea why the evo is such a *****.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 04:31 PM
  #175  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
I'm going to log a bunch of temps tonight and hopefully take a video.

I'll be back on Evom around 8-9pm to continue our discussion!

I'll have to post up my settings I'm at 790cc

Low Trim = -2.00
Mid Trim = 0.49
after 1000 miles of driving.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 04:34 PM
  #176  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Not sure if this has been mentioned yet in this thread but I have had a couple Evo 10's with these injectors, with the same warm start issues as well...

both moved to deatschwerks 1000cc's and no mo' problems.

One of them was on E85 and had no warm start issues with E85 but did on 91.

- Bryan

Last edited by GST Motorsports; Oct 27, 2009 at 04:36 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 05:20 PM
  #177  
travman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Here is a log of a good example of what is going on......hopefully dan (0xDEAD) can post up a log of his car starting with similar data as far as coolant temps etc.
Attached Files
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 05:25 PM
  #178  
nothere's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 1
From: Bellevue. WA
when you are having a hard start, has anyone pulled a plug to smell the cylinder?

and everyone tried opening up the throttle? iow, you are sure its not over fueling?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #179  
travman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by nothere
when you are having a hard start, has anyone pulled a plug to smell the cylinder?

and everyone tried opening up the throttle? iow, you are sure its not over fueling?
No - on the pull the plug, was going to do it last weekend but it rained most of the weekend. Will do it this weekend when I put fresh plugs in the car.....

Yes - It does start somewhat faster with the throttle at 100% at least it did on e85 - 93 octane I am not noticing the same thing. But when adjusting my tables I cant take much more fuel out or the car wont fire. Actually the table that takes over cranking after the initial pulse I am the lowest it will go other than 0 which I tried and the car just cranks, wont fire. My inital pulse I had it at 0 on top of that....?

I have done a lot of adjustments within the ecu with no luck....I am currently on 93 octane for the season, due to the winter months.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2009 | 07:17 PM
  #180  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by Tony1
So how do you explain 1 car doing it and one car not and swapping injectors makes no difference at all?
yes I see your point. but that just shows all the injectors are same. if they all leak after shut down you might have starting issues in one car but not the next. the tunes were swapped in thiose cars as well and there was no change as well. its setup related, not tune related. at least that is what I am seeing here

is there anyone who had this hard start issue and solved it by changing the latency tables?

Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Oct 27, 2009 at 07:26 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:33 AM.