Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

How to rid the low eng bog?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 26, 2003 | 07:22 AM
  #16  
evo1's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota
Originally posted by RnR Racing
Just get a 3" turbo back and you will see a huge difference. It will be much easier to drive.
Actually, a 3" system sacrifices a little low end for an extra tic or two on the top end. So an entire 3" system may not be his answer if he's looking for quicker spool-up and less lag. Now... a slightly smaller dp with the rest of the system being 3" could work.

Last edited by evo1; Sep 26, 2003 at 07:25 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2003 | 07:43 AM
  #17  
Liandrin11's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
That's only true for a N/A vehicle, which uses some exhaust back-pressure to create low-end torque, but with a turbocharged car the benefit of expelling the gasses as quickly from the turbocharger as possible via 3" piping which greatly decreases spool-up time far outweighs any benefit of a little bit of back pressure. Back pressure just slows down the turbine which is neither good for high-end HP OR low-end torque. I'd definitely go 3" all the way.

Last edited by Liandrin11; Sep 26, 2003 at 07:45 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2003 | 11:09 AM
  #18  
evo1's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota
Originally posted by Liandrin11
That's only true for a N/A vehicle, which uses some exhaust back-pressure to create low-end torque, but with a turbocharged car the benefit of expelling the gasses as quickly from the turbocharger as possible via 3" piping which greatly decreases spool-up time far outweighs any benefit of a little bit of back pressure. Back pressure just slows down the turbine which is neither good for high-end HP OR low-end torque. I'd definitely go 3" all the way.
I know-I know............ I've heard Garret argue this a million times over... BUT I disagree from my experience........ not that it's a huge difference... and I agree that this is more applicable for N/A vehicles.... but it still plays in on a turbo car. I've driven both (smaller vs. larger dp) on numorous occasions and can DEFINITELY feel the difference.... being that the 3" dp causes a tad more low end TQ loss... but with a little more at the top end as a tradeoff. This point has been argued MANY X before so we should probably just disagree and be done with it.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2003 | 11:49 AM
  #19  
Liandrin11's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
No prob.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2003 | 03:48 PM
  #20  
rarson's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Fallston, MD
Well it's a moot point because if you wanted a car with superfast spoolup you shouldn't have bought a car with a 16g on it. Didn't you test drive it first?

It's a high-powered turbo car. If you have no lag, you have no turbo. Easy as that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
akira2_03
04-06 Ralliart Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech
21
Dec 5, 2016 01:46 PM
David Buschur
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
206
Sep 6, 2015 09:27 PM
Mikami
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
0
Aug 28, 2015 03:11 PM
Noize
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
29
May 20, 2005 12:00 AM
Noize
Evo General
8
Sep 20, 2003 10:16 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:54 PM.