Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Bad Bish Update - Turbo Comparisons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 01:01 PM
  #31  
justa4banger's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: underground
Originally Posted by George@ICS
All in good time..

-G
not a hater at all...lol....
i watch all of your guys videos...thier are pretty funny sometimes....its funny how you and Al argue back and forth sometimes..lol...
good luck with that bad bish..cant wait to see a 8 sec pass on it...
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 01:21 PM
  #32  
George@ICS's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Stamford Ct
Originally Posted by justa4banger
not a hater at all...lol....
i watch all of your guys videos...thier are pretty funny sometimes....its funny how you and Al argue back and forth sometimes..lol...
good luck with that bad bish..cant wait to see a 8 sec pass on it...
I know...

-G
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 01:53 PM
  #33  
George@ICS's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Stamford Ct
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
There is a lot of activity here at Dyno Flash in the past few weeks and as spring approaches we are really begining to heat up

The Bad Bish is up and running again. George decided one day two weeks ago he was ready to get it going so he started with a $1,000 junk yard motor, dropped in some special high compression stock bore pistons, (they work really well) Manley Rods, balanced stock crank, put it all together and got the car running in 48 hours.

After a few easy break in miles, it was time last evening to hit the dyno

The only changes to the car since last year are

1 - No more Buschur Motor or head - car has stock head with valve springs now

2 - HTA35 swapped to PT62/82

3 - Car retuned by Dyno Flash

What is really interesting to me is to see how well the car is STILL running despite having a nearly totally different set up

Some things that remain on the car from last year

1 - Driven Innovations Intake Manifold

2 - Shearer T3 Gt35 Turbo manifold

3 - Buschur Race FMIC, Exhuast and Double pumper

TUNING NOTES * Removing the Buschur Head required 13% less fuel than before - even with the larger turbo so I am ASSUMING that if we put the Buschur head back on we would pick up at least 8% more power. This will be tested shortly.

Here is an intresting dyno sheet comparision



The green line is the original Bad Bish as tuned by Bushur with a Buschur motor and running the HTA35 on VP IMport at 44 psi

The Red line is the car last night - Dyno Flash/ICS motor (Lee spec) - stock head - and PT 62/82 Turbo - tuned by Dyno Flash on C16 - franly I was amazed by the power - really impressive - 40 psi of boost - we maxed out the 1200 injectors and stock regulator and now we will be adding a fuel pressure regulator. At the end you can see when the gas was lifted as the a/f is heading super lean.

The Blue is my Evo at 40 psi of boost - C16 - Buschur Engine and all Buschur Parts - tuned by Dyno Flash - HTA88/65 turbo - stock head

This comparision is super interesting as it shows the three turbos - HTA35. PT62 and HTA88 all on similar cars with similar boost. Its good to see how they spool up and where they make power.

We are going to upgrade the fuel system this week on the Bad Bish and then do some more tuning. Its a great car and has a lot of potential.


Here BTW - is my latest video - an executive from the NY Yankees stops by to play Dyno or NO Dyno with his lovely '08 Z06 vette.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3pJyb5_uaI

Al
The Bad Bish is making over 75whp in SAE Correction with less boost.

690 whp SAE Correction Previous = 747 uncorrected
765 whp SAE Correction currently = 792 uncorrected


-George Kakaletris
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 01:59 PM
  #34  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by George@ICS
The Bad Bish is making over 75whp in SAE Correction with less boost.

690 whp SAE Correction Previous = 747 uncorrected
765 whp SAE Correction currently = 792 uncorrected


-George Kakaletris
And on C~16 vs Import

I think there is another 20 whp in there also with more tuning.

But that would have to be expected given the change from the 60mm turbo HTA35 to the 62mm PT 62/82

It would be interesting to swap on the HTA86 I have comming later this week to see what efefct that has

PS - As you know I have little use for the SAE correction on turbo charged cars running such huge boost levels. The SAE correction was not created with these kind of cars in mind. At least it is not a "Control 'X'" factor lol. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOaaG...e=channel_page

Al

Last edited by DynoFlash; Mar 29, 2009 at 02:03 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 02:10 PM
  #35  
staatz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 1
From: Danbury, CT
Nice to see the car up and running.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 02:20 PM
  #36  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Here is a short video I made of the tuning last evening

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/B...yno_643617.htm

PS - George wanted to go out in the rain to finsih the tune and I told him to F O! Sorry - driving in 800 whp Evos in the rain is not my idea of fun.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 02:21 PM
  #37  
Boltz.'s Avatar
Evolved Member
FCOTM Winner
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, IL
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
That is not true

There was no secret when this motor had a problem, perhaps you did not follow my numerous videos on the subject?

IMHO - when you push **** to the edge you have to expect that you are going to break parts. That is just part of going very fast - period.

Also, so you know the failure had nothing to do with pump gas.

The old style JE pistons did not have enough material under the wrist pin to hold the piston together at ultra high rpms applications and the wrist pin woud eventually pull out from the bottom of the piston

The newer design Buschur / JE piston has a lot more material and is much stronger

BTW - everything looked very good inisde the original motor - all bearings perfect, no other damage.

Al
Its hard to follow all of your videos Al. They're all 10 minutes and not edited! Too many "bro's"! Just bustin your chops, they can be pretty fun to watch.

Did JE cover the damage?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 02:30 PM
  #38  
E85evo8's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
From: New York
sweet cars and funny vids...i hear ya, bro!
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 02:30 PM
  #39  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Boltz.
Its hard to follow all of your videos Al. They're all 10 minutes and not edited! Too many "bro's"! Just bustin your chops, they can be pretty fun to watch.

Did JE cover the damage?
I don't think they asked JE to cover the damage.

After so many months, so many miles and so many races, it would be hard to fault the pistons which sustained 30 plus psi and 630 whp on pump gas for so long.

Really when you are making that kind of power and driving the **** out of the car the parts will only last so long before you either freshen up the internals or it blows up.

At the end of the day the cars making over 600 whp are running 175 crank hp per hole which is significant on a 500 cc combusion chamber.

I, personally, don't expect any warranty on any racing parts.


PS - Most of my videos start off at 20 - 30 minutes and sometimes it takes me at least a week to decide what to include and what to put in. While they seem unedited, I am actually editing them. I dont like a highly posihed look with graphics and effects. Just my own personal taste.

Al
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 02:45 PM
  #40  
vwjeff's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas and HATING it
Originally Posted by Boltz.
Im guessing it took a dump. That thing was so highly strung on pump.

You see all the huge numbers from Buschur on pump, but they keep it pretty hush when something blows up or the fact that they're refreshing aka rebuilding those motors after 5k miles...
Go get a life

Dyno or No Dyno is just as good as the x-factor
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 02:49 PM
  #41  
Boost3dxEvO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (135)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by DynoFlash

The old style JE pistons did not have enough material under the wrist pin to hold the piston together at ultra high rpms applications and the wrist pin woud eventually pull out from the bottom of the piston

The newer design Buschur / JE piston has a lot more material and is much stronger


Al
Al,

This really worries me... When were these JE Pistons Produced and has Buschur since then quit selling these? Are they currently selling the JE's with "more" material? Do you have any idea when Peter's Old Motor was built with these JE Pistons with less material under the wrist pin?

Also, are the BF 272 Buschur Cams still in this stock head?

Thanks! I love your videos btw and love seeing you and George go at it lol!
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #42  
DentGuy05's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Algonquin, IL (near chicago)
Looking forward to some new and entertaining videos AL. BTW, the bad bish was the car that inspired me to trade my STI in for an Evo. GL take care of the bish
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 04:27 PM
  #43  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Boost3dxEvO
Al,

This really worries me... When were these JE Pistons Produced and has Buschur since then quit selling these? Are they currently selling the JE's with "more" material? Do you have any idea when Peter's Old Motor was built with these JE Pistons with less material under the wrist pin?

Also, are the BF 272 Buschur Cams still in this stock head?

Thanks! I love your videos btw and love seeing you and George go at it lol!
A few points

I used those old pistons on my race Evo with no problems and also they were in many cars with no issues.

I think they have not run those in a couple of years.

Yes the Br272 cams are still used.

Al
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 05:55 PM
  #44  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
I got confused by the part about the new motor with stock head needing 13% less fuel. Yet it makes more power with less boost?

And if this was a fault with the JE pistons, why don't you post pics and stuff and inform people. Or since there is so much controversy over this car and why the engine failed, why not post pics of the pistons to show people there was no signs of det?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 06:56 PM
  #45  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by crcain
I got confused by the part about the new motor with stock head needing 13% less fuel. Yet it makes more power with less boost?

And if this was a fault with the JE pistons, why don't you post pics and stuff and inform people. Or since there is so much controversy over this car and why the engine failed, why not post pics of the pistons to show people there was no signs of det?
The real answer to that is becuase I don't feel the need to waste energy to try and prove my word

This situation is not entirely uncommon when you rev a car to high rpms on the street over an extended period of time. For example, my STI had Ross pistons all of which came out with cracks under the wrist pins when I took it apart in October. I think that people have to understand that 9,000 and above rpms place tremendous forces on pistons and rods and that failures acan and will occur.

If you question or doubt what I am saying that is your issue and I really could care less.

Al
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:24 AM.