Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

High Compression Engine Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2009, 01:14 PM
  #61  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Migsubishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tampa bay area
Posts: 1,491
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
It all comes back down to the fuel used, no one would want to run high compression using pump gas and high boost. To run high compression and high boost would require high octane so that the boost pressure is not affected allowing more power to be made as long as the head stays on the block right?

I figure with the use of E100 that 12.2:1 compression can be easily used with boost pressures up to 40psi on lets say a 35r based turbo. I believe at around 40psi or under is where one would want to stay on a smaller framed turbo for longevity.

Now for these guys that are running methanol like M5 and better, well it would seem that boost really would no longer be a limiting factor wouldn't you say?

Not to sure but I'm trying to get all the knowledge possible on this. The only ones I know that have tried this is Spyros and others across seas that are making unbelievable power with little boost numbers.

Last edited by Migsubishi; Oct 15, 2009 at 01:22 PM.
Old Oct 15, 2009, 01:26 PM
  #62  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,332
Received 57 Likes on 44 Posts
Simply put, greater working pressures tend to upset a fuel's stability (a cause of detonation), and the octane rating is a fuel's ability to resist detonation. That being said, there is a limit to what a fuel of a given octane will withstand.

What works for a given combination depends upon a number of factors, such as the efficiency of the turbo, the design of the piston and combustion chamber, valve timing, etc., and so forth. Will E100 work with 12.2:1 SCR and a large turbo at 40psi? Maybe so. One either has to consider what's been done by others and how successful that appears, or, be willing to venture into the unknown and discover the answer himself. It's a question that isn't easy to resolve with math.

In short, just remember that boost trumps SCR. That being said, where there is a question, I'd prefer to stay in a 'safe area' with the SCR and be generous with the boost.

As for making better power with lesser boost, that is probably more so a function of volumetric efficiency than SCR. There is a reason why Hondas with 340cfm heads seem to make big power with relatively little effort.
Old Jan 25, 2011, 11:14 PM
  #63  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
PlanoEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: My House
Posts: 706
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
So doing an e85 only build with a 2.0 using a stock framed turbo what would the best CR be. I was thinking of 10:1 but maybe 10.5:1 might be better suited any thoughts?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JohnBradley
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
165
Jun 7, 2018 02:53 PM
ladiesman285
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
3
Aug 15, 2016 09:52 AM
lanceresx9
04-06 Ralliart Engine/Drivetrain
5
May 24, 2015 10:15 PM
EVIL_EV0
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
11
Sep 19, 2014 05:27 AM
Tractionlimit
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
6
Jun 30, 2010 08:40 AM



Quick Reply: High Compression Engine Build



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:46 AM.