Opinions on t3 .63 to .82
I did not feel that the .63 was choking up top but I was only boosting 30psi.
We are situated +1500m above sea level. I went with the .82 to free up some back pressure in the system.
At that boost level I feel keep the .63
Even if going up to 35psi boost the .63 might suffice but I can only confirm once we re-dyno.
I do think if you want top end power and still in the prcess of specing the turbo then .82
I will update once we slap the car on the dyno (will do a base pull before the Haltec is installed) this should give an indication of .63 vs .83
We are situated +1500m above sea level. I went with the .82 to free up some back pressure in the system.
At that boost level I feel keep the .63
Even if going up to 35psi boost the .63 might suffice but I can only confirm once we re-dyno.
I do think if you want top end power and still in the prcess of specing the turbo then .82
I will update once we slap the car on the dyno (will do a base pull before the Haltec is installed) this should give an indication of .63 vs .83
I did not feel that the .63 was choking up top but I was only boosting 30psi.
We are situated +1500m above sea level. I went with the .82 to free up some back pressure in the system.
At that boost level I feel keep the .63
Even if going up to 35psi boost the .63 might suffice but I can only confirm once we re-dyno.
I do think if you want top end power and still in the prcess of specing the turbo then .82
I will update once we slap the car on the dyno (will do a base pull before the Haltec is installed) this should give an indication of .63 vs .83
We are situated +1500m above sea level. I went with the .82 to free up some back pressure in the system.
At that boost level I feel keep the .63
Even if going up to 35psi boost the .63 might suffice but I can only confirm once we re-dyno.
I do think if you want top end power and still in the prcess of specing the turbo then .82
I will update once we slap the car on the dyno (will do a base pull before the Haltec is installed) this should give an indication of .63 vs .83
. Usually no updates means car broke and depression has set in. Let us know thanks.
In actual terms what is an "SC61" ? I have a bad feeling that means something with a 61mm inducer compressor wheel .
No offense but it hard to read turbo details when people quote compressors and turbines by their minor diameters instead of their major diameters .
Trim sizes can vary considerably changing minor diameters for the same family of wheel .
Also by 0.63 0.82 are you talking about GT30 turbine housings or the older T or TB series ones ?
A .
No offense but it hard to read turbo details when people quote compressors and turbines by their minor diameters instead of their major diameters .
Trim sizes can vary considerably changing minor diameters for the same family of wheel .
Also by 0.63 0.82 are you talking about GT30 turbine housings or the older T or TB series ones ?
A .
Tyrone doesnt mind the difference in response as the car is built for high rpm power and highway driving... (it hasnt been to a track because we fear for the stock rear GSR diff at current power levels)
I'm running the same turbo 6262 with a .63 on a 2.3L - I wouldnt go to a .82 because I dont have the same rev range as a 2.0L / 9500rpm.
I think for a street car that requires some solid mid range - the .63 is big enough and can make 600-700hp.
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mxguy1286
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
11
Apr 5, 2012 09:43 AM
mxguy1286
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
7
Jan 26, 2011 03:53 PM
03evoslowtion
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
64
Sep 28, 2010 07:37 PM





