Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Dynoflash VS Exede results!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 10:52 PM
  #46  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally posted by ez76


It does not matter that you can rewrite the maps from scratch if you are constrained to 256 cells and constrained to being driven exclusively by the car's sensors.

If the XEDE can change the input values seen by the ECU 11% more frequently, it can have 11% more control over what it does, regardless of the stock ECU resolution. More control = more potential for a smoother tune. The resolution of the stock ECU is not the most relevant factor nor is it necessarily the limiting one.

Assuming the ECU's sampling rate of its inputs is sufficiently high enough with the respect to the rate at which the XEDE can manipulate them, the XEDE can have more control over engine operation than the stock ECU. In fact, this is even more true in conjunction with a complementary reflash because at that point you are not even limited by the stock ECU's range of output behaviors (voltages): you can modify those to suit.
Respectfuly - I disagree 1,000 %

There is no way any piggy back - no matter how many times a second it samples or WHAT ever it does can ADD ANY additional "resolution" or sensitivity over the resolution of the stock ecu maps - its impossible. So long as the ECU fires the coils and injectors you are stuck with merely choosing which one of the stock ecu cells you want to run on - you can not get any additional choices no matter what you add on to the system.

Even worse for piggy back users - if you can't at least re-write those stock cells (eg reflash) your options are even more limited
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 10:52 PM
  #47  
ez76's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
From: bay area
Originally posted by MP5


EZ I understand your thinking here but I dont believe (I could be wrong) the EVO ECM is able to interpolate like this
Yeah, I think the bigger issue is that the XEDE's resolution is actually not (much) more than the Evo's.
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 10:56 PM
  #48  
MP5's Avatar
MP5
In Timeout
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 0
Originally posted by DynoFlash
Even worse for piggy back users - if you can't at least re-write those stock cells (eg reflash) your options are even more limited
Was that a unfinished point? There is no need to "rewrite" any OL on boost cells with the xede as it is "inducing" the intended behavior from the ECM. No spin zone AL!!
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 10:59 PM
  #49  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally posted by Chris in HB
A bunch of us in the DC area just got done with Al and the DynoFlash. Amazing is all I can say... I had one of the very best ECU guys in the country (Tadashi @ Technosquare) do my ECU when I lived in Cali, but I was curious what Al could do with my car and 93 octane. Since I had installed an intake suction pipe after the original flash, my A/Fs were off the chart lean: 13.1... not good. Anyhow, Al managed to drop them to 11.1 across the rev range and at the same time advance ignition timing without detonation. No power loss, lower EGT, etc. - outstanding! My only disappointment was to not gain over the 91 octane map. No worries. Al is a very knowledgeable and friendly guy. Those of you that bash him should actually meet him and talk to him before mouthing off. As for the XEDE, I have no experience, so I can't interject. Good work, Al - A lot of happy, power-hungry Evo owners in the DC area are glad you made it!

Chris
Thanks for the plug. Nice to meet you and the rest of the gang! And thanks for the opportunity and trust to work on your car. I approach re-tuning anything touched by Tadashi with great reverence and respect as he is a master of the art and a total class guy. In this case the RMR suction pipe leans out the air flow significantly and therefore any tuning which he did was out the window.

I think you can now see our thoery of Evo tuning. We run the car very rich - far richer than ALL major tuners. We run decent timing and we make good power with a incredable margin of error to assure that mo matter what kind of gas you get and what driving conditions you meet the car is running safe and detonation free.

ANOTHER set of wise ecu experts at run these cars under 10/1 a/f on the stock evos - for good cause. We feel that 11/1 is the best compromise between performance, saftey and engine life

PLEASE drive you car over the next few days and then report back how it reacts under various conditions and temps with the new richer tune
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 11:02 PM
  #50  
ez76's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
From: bay area
Originally posted by DynoFlash
There is no way any piggy back - no matter how many times a second it samples or WHAT ever it does can ADD ANY additional "resolution" or sensitivity over the resolution of the stock ecu maps - its impossible. So long as the ECU fires the coils and injectors you are stuck with merely choosing which one of the stock ecu cells you want to run on - you can not get any additional choices no matter what you add on to the system.
I think you are confusing resolution (output frequency) with range (set of possible output values).

Agreed the range of possible output values is limited, no question there, but unless I am wrong about the way the ECU translates inputs to outputs, the frequency at which those output values can change is not as constrained. If there are 256 hardcoded output values for fuel, ignition and boost, then at any given time you can only be choosing one of them, but if an external source can cause them to change at will (by manipulating the inputs at a high frequency), then with enough driver output values (piggyback map cells), you can effect higher resolution maps.

As far as range goes, if there are holes in the output range you want to fix, you can reflash the ECU to put them in desirable cells and complement the piggyback tune.

Then the limiting factor becomes the ECU's sampling rate; how quickly it can change outputs itself. MP5 hinted that our ECU doesn't really like to flip between nonadjacent cells *****-nilly, if that's the case then I concede most of this is for naught.
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 11:03 PM
  #51  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally posted by MP5


Was that a unfinished point? There is no need to "rewrite" any OL on boost cells with the xede as it is "inducing" the intended behavior from the ECM. No spin zone AL!!
What I mean by that is the ign timing is NOT smooth on stock EVOs - it jumps up and down - creating the rough power band and jumping boost gague on stock Evos

IF you want smooth those cells out - you have NO way to avoid the rough timing transitions without torturing the piggy back settings into a inflexable moras that throws off the tune the miunte you change gears or the temp changes

With a reflash - you simply rewrite the cells with the values you want - game over
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 11:05 PM
  #52  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally posted by ez76


I think you are confusing resolution (output frequency) with range (set of possible output values).

Agreed the range of possible output values is limited, no question there, but unless I am wrong about the way the ECU translates inputs to outputs, the frequency at which those output values can change is not as constrained. If there are 256 hardcoded output values for fuel, ignition and boost, then at any given time you can only be choosing one of them, but if an external source can cause them to change at will (by manipulating the inputs at a high frequency), then with enough driver output values (piggyback map cells), you can effect higher resolution maps.

As far as range goes, if there are holes in the output range you want to fix, you can reflash the ECU to put them in desirable cells and complement the piggyback tune.

Then the limiting factor becomes the ECU's sampling rate; how quickly it can change outputs itself. MP5 hinted that our ECU doesn't really like to flip between nonadjacent cells *****-nilly, if that's the case then I concede most of this is for naught.
Agreed with MP5 and evn worse than not being able to swtich between non adjasent cells - - the stock ecu takes an average of several cells at once - a real nightmare when you start to reach the bottom on the load axis
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 11:18 PM
  #53  
ez76's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
From: bay area
Originally posted by DynoFlash
Agreed with MP5 and evn worse than not being able to swtich between non adjasent cells - - the stock ecu takes an average of several cells at once - a real nightmare when you start to reach the bottom on the load axis
Interesting. If the averaging is predictable though then it is just one more function in the big black box that should be able to be accounted for by a suitable reflash of map values. Same with gear-dependent maps/behaviors, and temperature-dependent behaviors (if they're in maps rather than actual ECU code ). A lot more complexity though, to be sure. In the XEDE case you'd need to combine the functionality of XMap with that of a reflash tool to end up with an appropriate "do what I want" interface that knew not only how to drive the ECU but as well what values to stuff in its maps to get it to behave right.
Old Nov 30, 2003 | 10:33 AM
  #54  
DSMBRETT's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Petaluma, CA
Re: Dynoflash VS Xede results!

Originally posted by b18flip
Long story short.....after installing a 3" turbo back and a Vishnu Xede with a stage 0+ map, my Evo would not idle when the engine was cold. It would just die out, unless you gave it gas until it warmed up then it would idle at 900 rpm. After a $800 bill from the White Plains Mitsu dealer and 3 Xede units.....the car still wouldn't idle right. So we decided to pay a visit to Pruven Peformance and Al.

HERE ARE THE DYNO RESULTS: RED= XEDE, BLUE= DYNOFLASH



The car was brought into Pruven Performance with the xede installed and running. It was then dynoed with the xede (274whp), stock (244whp), and dynoflashed ( 272whp). Needless to say, I was surprised at the results: 1) the stage 0+ map was making the car run so lean with detonation. 2) Al was able to squeeze out as much power, if not more with less boost and a richer fuel curve.

The funny part is that the idle problem was fixed simply by adjusting the idle motor (thanks to the Pruven Performance Techs)

* I didn't make this thread to start another battle* Both Vishnu and Al did their best to help me out and I'd like to thank both parts for their efforts

So your idle problem had nothing to do with the XEDE? You actually made more peak power with our off the shelf map then with custom dyno tuning by Al? Even with running the incorrect filter in your car which hurt your A/F ratios and probably cost you some midrange and top end power as well. How many dyno runs did you do with the XEDE hooked up? How much were you charged for the reflash by the way?

Pity that Pruven didn't want to tune your XEDE so that you could have made more power than you ended up with custom tuning with the flash. I hope that AL didn't charge you full pop for the flash to pick up -2 horsepower when Pruven could have just tuned your XEDE with better results. Perhaps you should go back to PRUVEN, not Al and have them tune that XEDE on top of the flash and see how much power you pick up. I think you would be delighted by the results, as we have tuned on top of a few flashes here with the XEDE and have made significant gains over when the car was brought in.

Anyway for people wanting flashes our user tunabale flash is now in the final stretch and we will be offering the end user at least 2 maps to play with, possibly three. With mail order a posssibilty because of this unique feature and guaranteed more than 10-15 horsepower gains. Our tuning device will also work on a Works or Al flash as well giving the user a lot more flexibility. This will allow the drag/race guys on the list to add some race gas and change maps, similar to our XEDE set up, but using the flash and a small auxilary ECM unit. Take care guys.
Old Nov 30, 2003 | 10:42 AM
  #55  
Turbo Weapon's Avatar
In Timeout
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Re: Re: Dynoflash VS Xede results!

Originally posted by DSMBRETT
Even with running the incorrect filter in your car which hurt your A/F ratios and probably cost you some midrange and top end power as well.
I still love that BS
Old Nov 30, 2003 | 10:50 AM
  #56  
DSMBRETT's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Petaluma, CA
Originally posted by DynoFlash
In all sincereity - if a K & N pannel filter - which has no effect on the a/f ratios on my dyno and a down pipe are enough to throw the Exede "out of whack" then it is NOT a product that should be sold through the mail under ANY circumstances. Bottom line is there is more variance on stock evos from car to car than there is by putting a downpipe and a K & N filter
If you did actual testing then you would see that indeed the K7N fi8lter does cause the A/F ratios to change. That's why we recommend a stock filter with our mail order maps(which produced more power than you were able to make with custom tuning) without any intakes. The fact that this customer dynoed with the filter in makes the results invalid as far as power produced and A/F ratios. He more than likely would have made more power if the factory filter was left in and the A/F ratios would have been around the mid 11 range. Please do not make sweeping statements about the safety of our products as that does getr dangerous close to SLANDER(as you well should know being a lywarer).

As for the car to car variances that is easily accounted for: poor break in by the customer using the factory oil that comes in the car from the dealership. REMOVE the Mobil 1 immediately if you are buying and Evo to help the motor seal and replace it with mineral oil. PERIOD. If you did not do this then smell your oil cap or dipstick and tell me does it smell like oil, or gas? If it smells like gas then I shouldn't need to tell you what that is, or why it's bad. Also why the cars make different power from one to another. Very simple. You can also do a more complicated test(like we have done for countless Evo customers) that measures in H/C the amount of gas in the oil. Very surprising results.
Old Nov 30, 2003 | 10:52 AM
  #57  
DSMBRETT's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Petaluma, CA
Re: Re: Re: Dynoflash VS Xede results!

Originally posted by Turbo Weapon


I still love that BS
Actually the truth, not B.S. Anytime you are in the area pass by our shop and see for yourself. Changing filters/removing them causes changes in the A/f readings. That's why we need to custom tune cars with filters/intakes, plain and simple.
Old Nov 30, 2003 | 11:00 AM
  #58  
Turbo Weapon's Avatar
In Timeout
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Dave,AMS,Al and proven all make SUBSTANTIALLY more power then you. When you guys lay off the hype and make real power ill consider your *opinion*. Until then ill use the vishun topic of the day threads for my daily entertainment. You guys are always good for a quick chuckle.

Last edited by Turbo Weapon; Nov 30, 2003 at 11:05 AM.
Old Nov 30, 2003 | 11:23 AM
  #59  
Alfriedesq's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 1
From: Stamford, CT
Re: Re: Dynoflash VS Xede results!

Originally posted by DSMBRETT



So your idle problem had nothing to do with the XEDE? You actually made more peak power with our off the shelf map then with custom dyno tuning by Al? Even with running the incorrect filter in your car which hurt your A/F ratios and probably cost you some midrange and top end power as well. How many dyno runs did you do with the XEDE hooked up? How much were you charged for the reflash by the way?

Pity that Pruven didn't want to tune your XEDE so that you could have made more power than you ended up with custom tuning with the flash. I hope that AL didn't charge you full pop for the flash to pick up -2 horsepower when Pruven could have just tuned your XEDE with better results. Perhaps you should go back to PRUVEN, not Al and have them tune that XEDE on top of the flash and see how much power you pick up. I think you would be delighted by the results, as we have tuned on top of a few flashes here with the XEDE and have made significant gains over when the car was brought in.

Anyway for people wanting flashes our user tunabale flash is now in the final stretch and we will be offering the end user at least 2 maps to play with, possibly three. With mail order a posssibilty because of this unique feature and guaranteed more than 10-15 horsepower gains. Our tuning device will also work on a Works or Al flash as well giving the user a lot more flexibility. This will allow the drag/race guys on the list to add some race gas and change maps, similar to our XEDE set up, but using the flash and a small auxilary ECM unit. Take care guys.
Only a fantasically irrational person whould look at that dyno sheet and foucs on the little 2 whp spike up at the very peak of the Vishnu power band and ignore the 30 ft lbs of low end trq and massive gains all through out the power band !!!!!

Your like Mike Tyson fight Lenox Lewis claiming some small victory after getting his butt whipped for 12 rounds , saying - "my face was so tough I busted Lennox's fist with my nose"

The reflash - tuned and intsalled with dyno time costs $450.00 at Pruven in case your interested in getting one on your car !

I am offering this guy a free re-dyno session if he wants to come back and retest the Vishnu system on his ar with and without the air filter to show just how wrong you guys are about the K & N filter - however with 12.4 a/f's and serious detonation - he prob wont want to take the chance of blowing his motor to proove a point
Old Nov 30, 2003 | 11:27 AM
  #60  
Alfriedesq's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 1
From: Stamford, CT
Originally posted by DSMBRETT


If you did actual testing then you would see that indeed the K7N fi8lter does cause the A/F ratios to change. That's why we recommend a stock filter with our mail order maps(which produced more power than you were able to make with custom tuning) without any intakes. The fact that this customer dynoed with the filter in makes the results invalid as far as power produced and A/F ratios. He more than likely would have made more power if the factory filter was left in and the A/F ratios would have been around the mid 11 range. Please do not make sweeping statements about the safety of our products as that does getr dangerous close to SLANDER(as you well should know being a lywarer).

The K & N drop in filter does NOT significantly alter th a/f ratios on Evos - it is a very mild upgrade with little or no effect on a/f's

We will be testing this very soon - to show your lame excuses are just that - excuses

Slander is not slander if its true - I was only reporting what we saw



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:55 AM.