Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

New BW EFR Turbo Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2015 | 10:10 AM
  #3301  
deeman101's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 46
From: Bethesda, MD
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
The problem here is the single port actuator that is supplied with the EFR. It is garbage. Throw it away. Use the Turbosmart two port actuator and use the 3 port solenoid.

couple reasons.. a) its a garbage actuator b)it's single port c) flapper diameter is huge compared to most other IWG housings d) the pivot ratio (mechanical leverage) from the wastegate is very poor.

Eric, he already had the turbosmart WG actuator with 26lb spring, max preload, and wgdc at 100% in the top end. Yet still dropping boost in low gears and overboosting in high gears (I'm assuming he didn't want to run 40psi in 4th and 5th and overspeed the turbo). Many people pushing this turbo have the same issue apparently. I haven't seen any of them try a 4 port.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2015 | 11:34 AM
  #3302  
x622's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
This is the biggest problem I see with IWG configurations especially with a large compressor like this that's intended to have a dynamic boost range. It would be nice if instead of having a flapper they could somehow integrate a tial valve into it.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2015 | 12:29 PM
  #3303  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
Originally Posted by deeman101
Eric, he already had the turbosmart WG actuator with 26lb spring, max preload, and wgdc at 100% in the top end. Yet still dropping boost in low gears and overboosting in high gears (I'm assuming he didn't want to run 40psi in 4th and 5th and overspeed the turbo). Many people pushing this turbo have the same issue apparently. I haven't seen any of them try a 4 port.
Depends upon how you plumb the 3 port... and if you can configure your output as such. I have ability to dial in feed-forward boost by gear and then enable the PID after it. So you shouldn't see such a drop in boost, if you are it's just a matter of being capable with a keyboard and the software to tune it. I know it physically can do it, because I've done it. If the boost is tapering because it's out of compressor, then your turbospeed should reflect that. I suspect they aren't logging turbospeed and no real way to correlate whether they're out of compressor or having boost control issues. tspd sensor eliminates that guesswork.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2015 | 12:32 PM
  #3304  
URQaudiguy's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Eric, are your 2 port TurboSmart actuators sealed on the bottom port?
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2015 | 01:32 PM
  #3305  
Talonboost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Redmond Washington
Originally Posted by black E
I don't know why Matchbot has that speed rating of 560m/s for the larger turbos, that's incorrect, but it used to have the correct info...you can contact BW or go back on this thread to confirm my max speed statements. I have worked with BW since I got the 9174 and they were the ones that told me the 74mm turbine wheel is rated to 128K rpm max and the 80mm to 116K rpm max.
If you pull up the compressor map for the 7163 in matchbot you'll see what I meant and what all the maps should look like.
The 7163 map in matchbot shows a highest speed line of 150,500 rpm. If you calculate what tip speed that is on a 71mm dia wheel, that is 560 m/s. Same as every other EFR compressor map shown from the 7064 and up. You can do the conversion from rpm to tip speed in matchbot and get that answer. I prefer using my ancient HP 11C calculator for things like that haha keeps me in practice.
So anyway, I don’t necessarily buy the idea that max rated rpm for the 9174 is 128K just because its turbine wheel is rated for 128K. Like I said in post #3285, “there should be a max shaft speed that considers the whole turbo - compressor, turbine wheel, bearings, everything.” Since you have been getting your info from BW, I should probably just talk to the same person to get their explanation for it all. Can you tell me the name of the person and where he/she is?
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2015 | 03:56 PM
  #3306  
black E's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 45
From: Boca Raton FL
I think your missing the point of the speed rating. The turbine wheel will fail way before any other components fail due to the material they're using.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2015 | 03:57 PM
  #3307  
black E's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 45
From: Boca Raton FL
Originally Posted by URQaudiguy
Eric, are your 2 port TurboSmart actuators sealed on the bottom port?
The 2 I've had both leaked a little out the shaft seal.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2015 | 04:08 PM
  #3308  
black E's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 45
From: Boca Raton FL
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
black E,
your log looks like a boost leak or a BOV leak/premature ventilation?

TPS is still at WOT, MAP drops, N_TCHA rockets up...

Def no leaks or a premature opening or leak from the BOV, that's all constantly checked. Also a boost leak results in over speed across the board (if in close loop BC) not just in the last 30-40 milliseconds of a pull.
I was having fueling issues and that scenario only happened when doing multi gear pulls past 32-34psi. I could however do single gear 40psi pulls with no issues.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2015 | 09:00 PM
  #3309  
Talonboost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Redmond Washington
Originally Posted by black E
I think your missing the point of the speed rating. The turbine wheel will fail way before any other components fail due to the material they're using.
No I am not missing that point at all, and I think from what we have heard in this forum all along, the turbine wheels do seem to be the weak point.
But there is nothing hard to understand about me wanting to know who the source of your speed rating info is at BW, which I have asked for a few times now. As an engineer, I have to reference my information all the time. Or if I don't, and somebody asks me about my source, I don't try to avoid it. I never feel defensive about being asked for my source. So I am asking for the same from you. If you don't want to give me the person's name and contact info, well, just say so. No worries. I appreciate you posting your logs, experience, and opinions. So thanks for that.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2015 | 03:23 AM
  #3310  
black E's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 45
From: Boca Raton FL
I'm not defensive, is just that your asking me to give out a contact info that's not mine to give out. Here's BW's 2014 catalog: http://www.turbos.bwauto.com/files/p...bo_Catalog.pdf

That has all the speed ratings for the turbos. It also has their phone number so if you still need to contact someone about it you can.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2015 | 05:56 AM
  #3311  
RWD4G63's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 11
From: Mattawan, MI
Originally Posted by black E
I'm not defensive, is just that your asking me to give out a contact info that's not mine to give out. Here's BW's 2014 catalog: http://www.turbos.bwauto.com/files/p...bo_Catalog.pdf

That has all the speed ratings for the turbos. It also has their phone number so if you still need to contact someone about it you can.


Version 3 of the 2015 catalog is here:

http://www.turbos.bwauto.com/afterma...spx?doctype=16
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2015 | 04:00 PM
  #3312  
Talonboost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Redmond Washington
Originally Posted by black E
Here's BW's 2014 catalog: http://www.turbos.bwauto.com/files/p...bo_Catalog.pdf

That has all the speed ratings for the turbos. It also has their phone number so if you still need to contact someone about it you can.
Ok thanks. I can understand that you would rather not give out a person’s contact info, especially in a public forum, so no problem.

Originally Posted by RWD4G63
Version 3 of the 2015 catalog is here:

http://www.turbos.bwauto.com/afterma...spx?doctype=16
Thanks for the link to V3 of the catalog. I had only seen the 2014 catalog before this.

Their catalogs are nice, but I don’t see max turbo speeds listed, except as implied by the highest speed line shown on the compressor maps. The V3 catalog still does not have a page for the 9174. I was hoping that the "Technical Training book" might have a discussion on the subject of max turbo speed "rating" but I don't see one. That is a really nice document though. So yes, I will try to find somebody by phone who can delve into the engineering aspects of it with me.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2015 | 07:01 AM
  #3313  
khmerpimpin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
From: Clovis, California
Originally Posted by Talonboost
The 7163 map in matchbot shows a highest speed line of 150,500 rpm. If you calculate what tip speed that is on a 71mm dia wheel, that is 560 m/s. Same as every other EFR compressor map shown from the 7064 and up. You can do the conversion from rpm to tip speed in matchbot and get that answer. I prefer using my ancient HP 11C calculator for things like that haha keeps me in practice.
So anyway, I don’t necessarily buy the idea that max rated rpm for the 9174 is 128K just because its turbine wheel is rated for 128K. Like I said in post #3285, “there should be a max shaft speed that considers the whole turbo - compressor, turbine wheel, bearings, everything.” Since you have been getting your info from BW, I should probably just talk to the same person to get their explanation for it all. Can you tell me the name of the person and where he/she is?
https://www.facebook.com/fraserbrock
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2015 | 09:46 AM
  #3314  
killerpenguin21's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 11
From: Big city, Bright lights
i found some scattered data on the 6758 on i believe a 2L motor, but not sure how it crosses over to an evo? anyone know anything about the "indycar" 0.64 housing? im still trying to plan out a setup, i think the 7163 is too big for the power i need, but im not sure of the full capability of the 6758...

Last edited by killerpenguin21; Sep 6, 2015 at 09:51 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2015 | 12:18 PM
  #3315  
deeman101's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 46
From: Bethesda, MD
Originally Posted by killerpenguin21
i found some scattered data on the 6758 on i believe a 2L motor, but not sure how it crosses over to an evo? anyone know anything about the "indycar" 0.64 housing? im still trying to plan out a setup, i think the 7163 is too big for the power i need, but im not sure of the full capability of the 6758...

Anecdotally speaking from the dyno graphs I've seen from 6758 and 7163 the spool threshold is not really different between the two setups. Probably due to the small difference in size and the mft wheel on the 7163. The transient response on most efrs are described as so quick it doesn't matter, I assume the same holds true for turbos that are so close in size.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:47 PM.