New BW EFR Turbo Thread
Jan 9, 2011, 02:08 PM
#2
I just ordered 7 units for 1 of my cars, beat that! 
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...arner-efr.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...o-catalog.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...arner-efr.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...o-catalog.html
ummm, no.
Trending Topics
Jan 10, 2011, 11:11 AM
#9
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: houston
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
everything on paper for these new BW turbos looks like win to me... also, IN for results/testing! I like that supposed 1000hp capable 67ind/91exd billet EFR
-Tom
-Tom
Jan 10, 2011, 12:16 PM
#10
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Africa
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, dont get perky... I bought 3 units because our local currency was stronger against the $ and I did not know what size I wanted. 2x 7670 and 1x 8370
I have a evo9 road car that I want to put the T4 TS 7670 as I had major problems with a known stock frame turbo... stuffed after 1400 miles or so and bull stories of over speeding...llalal... long story for another day and thread.
Then I have to say the following with a bullet proof vest. I am building a RX7 fd3s with a evo9 engine.... This is a full circuit track car and I need a reliable light weight car. Rotary engines are all but reliable and a evo is to heavy... no need to have 4wd if you have 295 rear slicks and 265 front slicks.
I have a evo9 road car that I want to put the T4 TS 7670 as I had major problems with a known stock frame turbo... stuffed after 1400 miles or so and bull stories of over speeding...llalal... long story for another day and thread.
Then I have to say the following with a bullet proof vest. I am building a RX7 fd3s with a evo9 engine.... This is a full circuit track car and I need a reliable light weight car. Rotary engines are all but reliable and a evo is to heavy... no need to have 4wd if you have 295 rear slicks and 265 front slicks.
Jan 10, 2011, 12:33 PM
#11
Newbie
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree on paper the units look strong, but when has the first iteration of a new line of turbos ever been without a lot of headaches?
I remember when (by word of mouth at least) Precision and Turbonetics both had tons of failures. It will be interesting to see how well the launch of this new series goes for BW.
I remember when (by word of mouth at least) Precision and Turbonetics both had tons of failures. It will be interesting to see how well the launch of this new series goes for BW.
Jan 10, 2011, 04:42 PM
#15
I agree on paper the units look strong, but when has the first iteration of a new line of turbos ever been without a lot of headaches?
I remember when (by word of mouth at least) Precision and Turbonetics both had tons of failures. It will be interesting to see how well the launch of this new series goes for BW.
I remember when (by word of mouth at least) Precision and Turbonetics both had tons of failures. It will be interesting to see how well the launch of this new series goes for BW.
Garrett, yes.
MHI, yes.