Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

ATP'S GARRETT GTX3582R product review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2011, 08:43 PM
  #151  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: VaBeach, VA
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by ct9asilver
Comparing this graph with a lot of other graphs on a MD from either REESE, BR, or GST which all are probably within 5% or less, it seems as though this turbo spools up as fast as a HTA86 instead of say a FP Black which this ATP 3582 bolt on is supposed to compete with im guessing.

So looking at the results like that, this turbo is rather unimpressive so far, but if the wastgate issues are resolved hopefully it can shine....... but for now the FP BLACK wins, maybe the GTX3076R bolt on variant would do better, and be a better match for the stock style hotside
You are exactly correct, I didn't wan't to be the first to say it... My TS Black makes 36psi by 4500 and my SS Black makes 36psi by 4800. I'm not the slightest bit impressed. I am a 2.4 but all the 2.0 Blacks are still spooling much sooner than this turbo and so far makes more power too. We will have to see once the car is finished. Combos make the world of difference so we will need to see this turbo on a few cars to really get a grasp for it.

Mikey

* Edit - btw I just noticed that your MD reads VERY close to a DJ...

Last edited by BLKCarbonEVO; Feb 20, 2011 at 09:04 PM.
Old Feb 20, 2011, 10:18 PM
  #152  
Newbie
 
Coheed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i won't be convinced that the black is better unless it is tested back to back on the same dyno/config/car etc.

Until more testing is done, there is no definitive way to know for sure which one is better. We can just guess. Seeing as how this is one of the only graphs I've seen of the GTX, I'm taking it with a grain of salt to the actual potential.

Not everyone is going to make the same power on the black either. Let's see what further testing shows.
Old Feb 20, 2011, 10:51 PM
  #153  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
dtrackstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: U.S of A
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
* Edit - btw I just noticed that your MD reads VERY close to a DJ...[/QUOTE]


Do you know a lot of evo IXs that put 225-230 on a DJ? My understanding that most put around 250 or so.

If I remember correctly GST's MD puts around the same 225-230 for stock evo IXs.
Old Feb 21, 2011, 06:27 AM
  #154  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: VaBeach, VA
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by dtrackstar
* Edit - btw I just noticed that your MD reads VERY close to a DJ...

Do you know a lot of evo IXs that put 225-230 on a DJ? My understanding that most put around 250 or so.

If I remember correctly GST's MD puts around the same 225-230 for stock evo IXs.[/QUOTE]

I can double check but I am pretty sure that a stock IX on ER's DJ puts down 235-240ish.

Mikey
Old Feb 21, 2011, 10:49 AM
  #155  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
ct9asilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dtrackstar
* Edit - btw I just noticed that your MD reads VERY close to a DJ...

Do you know a lot of evo IXs that put 225-230 on a DJ? My understanding that most put around 250 or so.

If I remember correctly GST's MD puts around the same 225-230 for stock evo IXs.[/quote]


These are the numbers for stock evo's on GST's dyno, from this thread..... https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...-e85-army.html


Stock 03/04 evo = 190-210whp

Stock 05 evo = 210-215whp

Stock 06 evo = 220-230whp

Stock 08 evo = 215-230whp

Stock 09 Ralliart = 190-199whp

Considering the mods on this test car im disappointed, but who knows maybe this turbo comes alive after 36 PSI If FFTEC's dyno reads about the same as a DJ, wouldn't that mean that on a unmolested MD it would be around 470-480 AWHP!!! that's a huge let down, but i agree with coheed lets wait for more results, maybe somethings amiss with this setup.

Last edited by ct9asilver; Feb 21, 2011 at 10:54 AM.
Old Feb 21, 2011, 11:42 AM
  #156  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
PATRICK B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ct9asilver
If FFTEC's dyno reads about the same as a DJ, wouldn't that mean that on a unmolested MD it would be around 470-480 AWHP!!!

Our MD has not been manipulated what so ever.

Based on many other cars built/tuned here in comparison to weight/ET/MPHs from other reputable companies our MD reads about 13-15% LESS THAN most DJ's

We have many other graphs to compare other set-ups ie. (FP BLACK, BBK B, HTA3582, PTE6262, PTE6765, GT3582, GT3076, BBK FULL, etc.)

All of them have very different combos so not very fair comparisons but enough to get a grasp of what this turbo is doing at this point and although the #'s may not seem mind-blowing to some it's about what i was expecting.

Not sure if i care to sift through all the different graphs and try to remember all the different combos to post up and appease those with concerns as we really have nothing to gain from it.

We were curious to see how it would perfom so we tested it and put up the #'s
Old Feb 21, 2011, 11:48 AM
  #157  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (51)
 
LGshow19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you for testing this turbo. It may not be astounding results, but i appreciate you taking your time to do so.
Old Feb 21, 2011, 11:50 AM
  #158  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
PATRICK B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by LGshow19
Thank you for testing this turbo. It may not be astounding results, but i appreciate you taking your time to do so.
Welcome!

FWIW if i remember correct i believe William (stock block/e85/fp black) makes 590ish on AWD's DJ and most stock block 35R's on our dyno run right at 475-500 so if you do the math 500x1.15 = 575 so it's pretty darn close and i'm not sure what kinda boost Williams was running but that tends to be right about 36-39psi on a T3 based set-up on our dyno.

Not trying to sell anyone as the #'s have been scrutinized about the FP BLACK and what it compares to turbo size wise but some people may be looking at other factors when purchasing a turbo.

Lots to choose from out there that's for sure!

Last edited by PATRICK B.; Feb 21, 2011 at 11:58 AM.
Old Feb 21, 2011, 11:55 AM
  #159  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
06MREvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 4,800
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Thanks Pat & FFTEC for doing the test...any plans for some 1/4 mile passes before pulling it off the car?
Old Feb 21, 2011, 11:59 AM
  #160  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
PATRICK B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 06MREvo
Thanks Pat & FFTEC for doing the test...any plans for some 1/4 mile passes before pulling it off the car?
Most def!

Our first CMI race is scheduled for Mar 6th but it's finally been wet like it should be out here so if we get some prior testing you can count on me to post something up.
Old Feb 21, 2011, 01:14 PM
  #161  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
ct9asilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks for clearing that up Patrick, so since your dyno is a low reading type like Buscher and the other reputable shops the numbers do seem reasonable I was assuming that you setup your mustang to read the same as the Dynojet you guys had, but the lag still seems bad for a stock framed BB,
Old Feb 22, 2011, 10:54 AM
  #162  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
PATRICK B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ct9asilver
Thanks for clearing that up Patrick, so since your dyno is a low reading type like Buscher and the other reputable shops the numbers do seem reasonable I was assuming that you setup your mustang to read the same as the Dynojet you guys had, but the lag still seems bad for a stock framed BB,
No worries but just to be 100% clear we never had a DJ just the MD since 2006
Old Feb 22, 2011, 11:58 AM
  #163  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
PATRICK B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 06MREvo
Damn that manifold looks awesome...any pics of it off the car? Or another thread with pics...
My bad i forgot about this post!

You can scroll though some of our blog entries to find out more:

http://www.fftec.com/blog/?cat=1
Old Mar 8, 2011, 04:13 AM
  #164  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
evo8john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lincoln, Ne
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bump! did the wg issues get resolved and more testing follow?
Old Mar 15, 2011, 01:48 PM
  #165  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
PATRICK B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by evo8john
Bump! did the wg issues get resolved and more testing follow?
No the WG has not been touched since.

The car has been with the owner as he had not been in the seat for a while and when he first drove it he said it felt great!

Then a few days later he came by the shop and said it felt slow and needed more power

We're swamped again at the shop so not sure as to when we may get it back in to try out a few more things to keep the boost pressure up.

We did have a scheduled race to attend a week or so ago but it was rained out so we will wait for a TNT day when the weather is good.


Quick Reply: ATP'S GARRETT GTX3582R product review



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:22 PM.