Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

What cams for HKS 7460 turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 02:11 PM
  #1  
KakimotoRR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: GREECE
What cams for HKS 7460 turbo?

Which your opinion ? I have too many choices but which better?

thanks
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 02:11 PM
  #2  
Mauricio Evo IV's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 632
Likes: 2
From: Santa Tecla
Kelford 272´s
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 02:54 PM
  #3  
MikeB@FFTEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 93
Likes: 1
From: Union City
Kelford 272s are always great. There are also the new HKS cam grinds 274/278 for the 8 and also GSC S2 if you can find them in stock.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 03:06 PM
  #4  
SRToad4's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 364
Likes: 1
From: Scottsdale, AZ
My buddy runs the HKS turbo, GSC S2's, 1450's, speed density, e85, and puts down 450/430 (torque kept low so that the stock block holds together)
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 03:24 PM
  #5  
blackenedwings's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 4
From: Columbia, MD
Kelford 272s or GSC S2s are the forum favorites for most setups. Larger displacement motors (2.3/2.4) are going to want something more aggressive.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 03:28 PM
  #6  
MR BURTON69's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
Fp4r
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2011 | 06:21 PM
  #7  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
What about the GSC S3 cams? Everyone raves about the S2's, but I am curious about the S3's myself.

Which of these two GSC cam grinds would work better with a fully ported cylinder head? What else is needed besides retainers and springs to be able to run the S3's?

Last edited by sparky; Jun 10, 2011 at 06:24 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 08:47 AM
  #8  
evo8426's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,248
Likes: 9
From: Charlotte, North Carolina
Originally Posted by sparky
What about the GSC S3 cams? Everyone raves about the S2's, but I am curious about the S3's myself.

Which of these two GSC cam grinds would work better with a fully ported cylinder head? What else is needed besides retainers and springs to be able to run the S3's?
I thought a built motor was necessary to run the S3's because they have such a high lift that would put the valves into the top of the piston.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 09:06 AM
  #9  
b16a2delsol's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: killa streets of slc
Why would a built motor change the piston clearance?
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 09:10 AM
  #10  
evo8426's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,248
Likes: 9
From: Charlotte, North Carolina
Piston being designed for the valves to travel further into the combustion chamber, Wiseco calls them valve pockets

Last edited by evo8426; Jun 11, 2011 at 09:14 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 09:26 AM
  #11  
b16a2delsol's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: killa streets of slc
Originally Posted by evo8426
Piston being designed for the valves to travel further into the combustion chamber, Wiseco calls them valve pockets
Thats what I thought you meant . But then I was thinking I really only see those on an all motor setup.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 10:02 AM
  #12  
MikeB@FFTEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 93
Likes: 1
From: Union City
Originally Posted by evo8426
I thought a built motor was necessary to run the S3's because they have such a high lift that would put the valves into the top of the piston.
The S3 also have a much longer duration as well. It's not just the lift that would factor into cam selection, but also the type of motor and how high you plan on revving it as well. With a turbo like the HKS, you would want a cam to take advantage of the quicker spooling capabilities like a 272 or equivalent. A 280 camshaft would work better for a higher revving or big turbo motor that would carry the powerband in the upper RPM range.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 10:37 AM
  #13  
tiggeryellow1's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 559
Likes: 1
From: Tampa/Riverview
Originally Posted by MikeB@FFTEC
The S3 also have a much longer duration as well. It's not just the lift that would factor into cam selection, but also the type of motor and how high you plan on revving it as well. With a turbo like the HKS, you would want a cam to take advantage of the quicker spooling capabilities like a 272 or equivalent. A 280 camshaft would work better for a higher revving or big turbo motor that would carry the powerband in the upper RPM range.
+1... What are your intentions for this car? I see in your signature that you have the "Fastest EVO Drag car in Europe" soooooo is this a drag car? Or a DD that you also drag? Do you do Auto-X? I need some more information.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 04:45 PM
  #14  
KakimotoRR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: GREECE
We had the fastest drag evo in the europe from Greece...Now it's not!!!

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/au...-drag-evo.html

My question about the cams is for the other project...
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2011 | 05:07 PM
  #15  
blknblubkrdude's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: Gillette, WY
The S2's are a great cam, along with the Kelfords. Honestly I would not pair them with a turbo like the HKS, that is aimed towards quick spool and fast response.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:38 AM.