Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Power falls off bad around 720 HP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 04:47 PM
  #31  
Joshs EVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From: Thornton, CO & Pasadena, MD
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
I'd throw a new set of Kiggly's at it for a cheap test.

After that I'd try a BW EFR 9180 with the big T4 TS hsg.
Not after what Geoff told me about the 9180. Lag doesn't bother me. It's fun as hell getting up to full boost on this turbo and the wait is killing me and I would need a new manifold anyways.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 05:05 PM
  #32  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
Originally Posted by Joshs EVO
Not after what Geoff told me about the 9180. Lag doesn't bother me. It's fun as hell getting up to full boost on this turbo and the wait is killing me and I would need a new manifold anyways.
yeah you're right.

You need to:

A) move to washington
B) buy a 4202R
C) lower your hp standards.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 05:05 PM
  #33  
SmurfZilla's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
Or get a bigger hotside? 1.00 housing should be enough.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 05:07 PM
  #34  
rodent's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 700
Likes: 3
From: Highlands Ranch, CO
When it falls on its face, is there a miss / hesitation / backfire?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 05:24 PM
  #35  
Joshs EVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From: Thornton, CO & Pasadena, MD
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
720whp corrected or uncorrected, Mustang or DJ, and you can see valve float in the dyno sheet in the event you cant hear it. I just received a 1.15 this morning and it doesnt look that big

Aaron
That would be um uncorrected I think. It is on a Mustang.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 05:26 PM
  #36  
Joshs EVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From: Thornton, CO & Pasadena, MD
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
yeah you're right.

You need to:

A) move to washington
B) buy a 4202R
C) lower your hp standards.
Actually I was thinking of doing the BW S4000. It's the older style large turbo and it seemed to do pretty good on spool and made 684 on 24 lbs up here in CO on Tobz car. Turn the wick up a bit and it would be a sick setup. So I am tossing this idea around.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 05:29 PM
  #37  
Joshs EVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From: Thornton, CO & Pasadena, MD
Originally Posted by rodent
When it falls on its face, is there a miss / hesitation / backfire?
I do not believe so. I believe it is the same scenario when we had the 4088 issue. The car would perform great until the turbo couldn't compress anymore air. Honestly the last time I really hammered on it I loved it and feels so strong. But the dyno tells a different story. I just can't tell in the seat that the HP is falling off. Maybe because by that time I am doing well over 140 Mph and my attention is on the road more than the car itself.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 05:39 PM
  #38  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
I'd personally like to see the dyno graph and the tune in the car, particularly the timing map.

Depending on just how drastically it falls off I have a few guesses. If it's really bad, I'd go along with valve springs but don't agree with some of the suggestions for replacements. I don't think it's the cams. It could be the twin scroll housing too, I haven't seen one yet make great power up top if they have any low end at all.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 05:39 PM
  #39  
rodent's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 700
Likes: 3
From: Highlands Ranch, CO
Originally Posted by Joshs EVO
That would be um uncorrected I think. It is on a Mustang.
720 should be corrected on his dyno.

Originally Posted by Joshs EVO
I do not believe so. I believe it is the same scenario when we had the 4088 issue. The car would perform great until the turbo couldn't compress anymore air. Honestly the last time I really hammered on it I loved it and feels so strong. But the dyno tells a different story. I just can't tell in the seat that the HP is falling off. Maybe because by that time I am doing well over 140 Mph and my attention is on the road more than the car itself.
Thats totally weird hp falls like that but it maintains boost at 35psi.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 06:08 PM
  #40  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by TwStDeVo
honestly man, i think its the twinscroll set up. all the cars with singlescroll kits made crazy power and held all the way. id be willing to bet that if you swapped to singlescroll it would solve your issue.
i disagree very much.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 06:12 PM
  #41  
n2oiroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 5
From: milwaukee, wi
720, uncorrected on a mustang at elevation? doesnt sound too bad to me.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 08:37 PM
  #42  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
720 uncorrected on a Mustang is intense. I'll explain why. Marcus that owns the 2G DSM auto that has been on Tobz dyno showed his power with a 1.20 or 1.21 correction for sea level to make it right.

So if its a new style Mustang that reads like COBB (read DJ numbers) that would still be a bunch. If its corrected and reads like DBs then thats still not shabby. I am with Dave, we need to see the dyno sheet and timing map.

Aaron
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2011 | 08:24 AM
  #43  
Magnumpsi's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: Who Knows
That is corrected. All of Tobz numbers are corrected.

Mitch



Originally Posted by JohnBradley
720 uncorrected on a Mustang is intense. I'll explain why. Marcus that owns the 2G DSM auto that has been on Tobz dyno showed his power with a 1.20 or 1.21 correction for sea level to make it right.

So if its a new style Mustang that reads like COBB (read DJ numbers) that would still be a bunch. If its corrected and reads like DBs then thats still not shabby. I am with Dave, we need to see the dyno sheet and timing map.

Aaron
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2011 | 08:44 AM
  #44  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Can you post the dyno sheet up today? I'd like to see it. I'd be glad to look at the map too if you want to e-mail it to me or just take a screen shot and send the timing map.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2011 | 08:57 AM
  #45  
MOREPSiTEHBETT4's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 697
Likes: 1
From: Mitchigan
Originally Posted by evodan2004
i disagree very much.
you can't argue with the graphs people have posted, the twinscroll just can't keep up at high rpm.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:18 PM.