Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Combustion chamber vs. Bore size

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2012, 06:09 PM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
awdordie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: tennessee
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Combustion chamber vs. Bore size

Just wanted some info on this for a project of mine (not an evolution or mitsubishi for that matter) and thought it may get alot more input over here since their seems to be alot more knowledgeable people in this forum than others.

lets say i have an 81mm std. bore size from the factory, and i take it out to 84.5mm bore. if i have the head ported what would be the pros and cons to leaving the combustion chamber the same 81mm circumfrence as opposed to having them open it up to 84.5mm besides the fact it will have a higher comp leaving it as is and a lower comp machining it out to 84.5mm. or is it even possible to leave it at 81mm without running into trouble when going with that much bigger of a bore?
Old Feb 19, 2012, 04:09 PM
  #2  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
HeadGames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: EWING,NEW JERSEY
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
your bore size on the head stock is somewhere near 83mm..so it is not to much to make it bigger. It would benefit from the bigger chamber, so you don't have the material in the bore creating basically more quench and leaving it open to detonation. But, also consider your CC chamber size when purchasing the piston for compression numbers. As you will be making it larger then stock.
Old Feb 22, 2012, 03:04 AM
  #3  
Evolving Member
 
SOUL STEALER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: GA
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I respectfully disagree. Quench zone is your friend and shouldn't be taken out unless you need the cc's.




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:58 AM.