Why is my 4g64 w/Evo VIII Head Perfectly in Time?
evo/dsm/4g63 gears have the cam gear mark on the peak of a tooth, 94 galant has it on the valley between teeth. they moved it for a reason. I degree my **** the right way.
obviously its not the god damn belt length that is making it a half tooth off it is the deck height. When I was talking about the belt being 12mm longer it was to explain why you get mixed results between the two belts. The 64 belt allows your to but a extra tooth on the drive side...
get over the belt length thing. The ONLY thing that matters is getting the cams zero'd.
Aim the inner marks on your adjustable cam gears at the stock timing marks is close is good enough for you. Degree your cams properly if you want to build a motor like a big boy.
Last edited by akauf; Jun 12, 2012 at 12:56 PM.
bust out the degree wheel and dial gauge
..or if you think building motors is like horse shoes and hand grenades line the inner marks to your valve cover. whatever
94awdcoupe: I'm not mucking up anything. I'm saying the same thing you are. I just wanted to go into detail on why people end up out of time one way or the other depending on what belt they use and why that is. Everyone always seems confused why the belt "makes it change."
ultimately the deck height is what changes things....
Last edited by akauf; Jun 12, 2012 at 01:06 PM.
k dude, I'm saying deck height changes timng, I've said it several times. teh difference in why you end up advanced with a 63 belt and retarded with the 64 belt is because you put an extra tooth on the drive side of the belt.
evo/dsm/4g63 gears have the cam gear mark on the peak of a tooth, 94 galant has it on the valley between teeth. they moved it for a reason. I degree my **** the right way.
obviously its not the god damn belt length that is making it a half tooth off it is the deck height. When I was talking about the belt being 12mm longer it was to explain why you get mixed results between the two belts. The 64 belt allows your to but a extra tooth on the drive side...
get over the belt length thing. The ONLY thing that matters is getting the cams zero'd.
Aim the inner marks on your adjustable cam gears at the stock timing marks is close is good enough for you. Degree your cams properly if you want to build a motor like a big boy.
evo/dsm/4g63 gears have the cam gear mark on the peak of a tooth, 94 galant has it on the valley between teeth. they moved it for a reason. I degree my **** the right way.
obviously its not the god damn belt length that is making it a half tooth off it is the deck height. When I was talking about the belt being 12mm longer it was to explain why you get mixed results between the two belts. The 64 belt allows your to but a extra tooth on the drive side...
get over the belt length thing. The ONLY thing that matters is getting the cams zero'd.
Aim the inner marks on your adjustable cam gears at the stock timing marks is close is good enough for you. Degree your cams properly if you want to build a motor like a big boy.
the fixed idler gear (middle right circle) would need to move in order to get timing changes with belt length changes. in the case of VVT that pulley is not fixed and moves. thats how they get timing changes. in the 4g63 that pulley does not move.
exactly, thats it.
bust out the degree wheel and dial gauge
..or if you think building motors is like horse shoes and hand grenades line the inner marks to your valve cover. whatever
94awdcoupe: I'm not mucking up anything. I'm saying the same thing you are. I just wanted to go into detail on why people end up out of time one way or the other depending on what belt they use and why that is. Everyone always seems confused why the belt "makes it change."
ultimately the deck height is what changes things....
bust out the degree wheel and dial gauge
..or if you think building motors is like horse shoes and hand grenades line the inner marks to your valve cover. whatever
94awdcoupe: I'm not mucking up anything. I'm saying the same thing you are. I just wanted to go into detail on why people end up out of time one way or the other depending on what belt they use and why that is. Everyone always seems confused why the belt "makes it change."
ultimately the deck height is what changes things....
we are not saying same thing.

I explained that this happens when people put the extra tooth on the drive side of the belt. which is possible with either belt.
so it goes from half a tooth advanced to half a tooth retard because the 64 belt is allowing people to put 51 teeth on the drive side. ultimately your results will vary and that explanation tends to confuse.
my explanation was simply to clarify why people are coming to different results using the different belts. Not to claim the belt is ultimately why it ends up off time
Last edited by akauf; Jun 12, 2012 at 01:53 PM.
but is way over the heads of the intelligence in this thread. so I will not be wasting any more of my time
here you try:
freddie "retard 3.75* for 63 belt, advance 3.75* for 64 belt"
blue91t: "why is it that you end up half a tooth off in opposite directs with either belt??"
now interject and describe why these events occur...
freddie "retard 3.75* for 63 belt, advance 3.75* for 64 belt"
blue91t: "why is it that you end up half a tooth off in opposite directs with either belt??"
now interject and describe why these events occur...
try to understand the context before you move to ad hominem attacks next time
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 5
From: Philadelphia, PA
Yeah its not cut and dry but even when I see others degree a motor its fairly close to the -3.75 range. Typically in the .75* range +/-.
If your car would not run well on the other dowel hole, you likely had cam timing off. Typically if you line up the crank to the T and then on the EVO dowel holes adjust the inner aluminum sliding cam line to point to the valve cover mark, then you're pretty much there.
If your car would not run well on the other dowel hole, you likely had cam timing off. Typically if you line up the crank to the T and then on the EVO dowel holes adjust the inner aluminum sliding cam line to point to the valve cover mark, then you're pretty much there.
The dowel pins are in the right holes.
Forget the cam gears, as I solved that issue a year ago.
The dowel pins are not in the right holes. Period. Overlay a stock gear on the DSM hole of the Fidanza and you will see it DOES NOT line up. It is a tooth off. Its very simple. A DSM hole Fidanza is true ZERO is at -7.5* on the gear on an Evo.
Last edited by Anarchy99; Jun 12, 2012 at 02:47 PM.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 5
From: Philadelphia, PA
Haha well I guess I accidentally have my motor spinning backwards then.
both rotate clockwise.
with the 63 belt installed you ended up -3.75. it was supposed to be +3.75. take out the -7.5 from the cam gear being in the wrong hole and it sounds like the belt is on right
maybe your not getting all the slack out of the 64 belt
with the 63 belt installed you ended up -3.75. it was supposed to be +3.75. take out the -7.5 from the cam gear being in the wrong hole and it sounds like the belt is on right
maybe your not getting all the slack out of the 64 belt




