Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Higher base fuel pressure - I like it...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 15, 2013 | 11:45 PM
  #16  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by hydra
... and to tune injection time in such a way that all the fuel injection is done while the intake valves are open.
I think you'll find that OEs time sequential pulses to fire when the valve is closed, ostensibly to reduce cylinder wash. This benefits wear rates, although at the expense of a bit of torque.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2013 | 07:32 AM
  #17  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
Even with 310* cams, you would have to be under 43% IDC to only inject when the valve was open.

I have heard spraying a closed valve does actually help atomize some of the fuel as the valve is hot and helps the fuel evaporate. It also helps keep the valve cooler. With that in mind, I would THINK you would want the end of the pulse to reach the valve right as it is closing.

Not exactly what you are after, but something I am mulling over. Bosch makes a HP version of the 044 pump. It is rated at 8bar. It matches up well with the EV14 injectors that are also rated for 8 bar operation. The HP version does about 200lph at 8 bar. This would mean a single pump would be about right for four 740cc injectors at 5.5 bar base fuel pressure and 2.5 bar of boost. This would make them about the same as 960cc inectors. This would probably be about right for a setup making around 550WHP when fully maxed out on boost. The benefit being they aren't modified injectors with crappy spray patterns, 100% OEM bosch. You can also match them up with a Bosch OEM FPR. I like the idea of OEM parts working together anyway.

Last edited by 03whitegsr; Jan 16, 2013 at 09:11 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2013 | 09:35 AM
  #18  
TheBoz's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 15
From: Space time
Originally Posted by mrfred
Not quite that simple. The pump flow rate drops as pressure rises. The flow rate on most in-tank pumps begins to drop rapidly after 90 psi and then falls like a rock after 100 psi. I don't think a Walbro 255 will even flow at 100 psi. A car running 30 psi of boost probably should have a base pressure no higher than 60 psi (90 psi - 30 psi = 60 psi), and realistically, probably should be no more than 55 psi because there is an additional back pressure due to fricitional losses of the fuel moving through the fuel lines. Also, the stock dual voltage setup doesn't work well with really high base pressure. The pump can stall out pretty easily in low voltage mode if the base pressure is too high. I'm definitely pushing the limit by going to 58 psi - the Walbro 416 might be one of the few pumps that can handle that kind of pressure.

So best to turn up base pressure in 5 psi increments while watching AFR. Assuming that the pump can supply the necessary fuel, the injectors scaling will neet to be adjusted for the additional flow.
I was talking about running 80psi all the time. Remove the boost ref from the FPR and set the fuel pressure at 80psi.

However who knows how fast that would kill your fuel pump. It would be drawing more amps at that level.

Anyhow cool results, I will be adjusting mine as well just to see how the car likes it.

The other guy that was talking about tuning injection angle, can you do that on the stock ECU. I am on an AEM EMS, and we have a full 3d map for Injector Phasing(RPM, Boost)
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2013 | 10:18 AM
  #19  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by TheBoz
I was talking about running 80psi all the time. Remove the boost ref from the FPR and set the fuel pressure at 80psi.

...
You don't want to do that. The vacuum/boost reference is needed to keep the pressure across the injectors constant.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 06:10 AM
  #20  
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 13
From: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
Think there are any benefits due to injection angle?
Most definitely

IMO, the current angle is to steep. ok for low speed driving & emissions

Should be pointing towards the center of the valve. not so much the backside of the port, but the valve head itself & when i say center of the valve, im not referring to the stem.

yeah, there will need to be some injection timing adjustments made to maximize the angle change, but thats simple enough.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 09:23 AM
  #21  
TheBoz's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 15
From: Space time
Originally Posted by mrfred
You don't want to do that. The vacuum/boost reference is needed to keep the pressure across the injectors constant.
That does not make any sense to me. I might be special ed, but if your regulator is working it should be able to maintain the selected fuel pressure with out a pressure reference.

Or are you saying that as your IDC increases it will affect the FPR.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 09:33 AM
  #22  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by TheBoz
That does not make any sense to me. I might be special ed, but if your regulator is working it should be able to maintain the selected fuel pressure with out a pressure reference.

Or are you saying that as your IDC increases it will affect the FPR.
The job of the FPR is to maintain a set fuel pressure *across* the injectors. In order to do this, the FPR needs to reference the pressure at the outlet of the injector. This is why the vacuum/boost reference is needed. Definitely do not run without the vacuum/boost reference attached.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 10:01 AM
  #23  
itsmrrizz2you's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 655
Likes: 1
From: queens
i am doing the same as you mrfred but on pump 93.... good info for sure
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 06:21 PM
  #24  
TheBoz's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 15
From: Space time
Originally Posted by mrfred
The job of the FPR is to maintain a set fuel pressure *across* the injectors. In order to do this, the FPR needs to reference the pressure at the outlet of the injector. This is why the vacuum/boost reference is needed. Definitely do not run without the vacuum/boost reference attached.
Got it that makes more sense.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 12:12 AM
  #25  
wreckleford's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 11
From: Jamaica
I am wondering if the advantage mrfred is seeing is more of an e85 thing or if it would be just as beneficial on pump gas. Why I ask is because if there was a pump gas advantage, why would the oems stick with the 43 psi differential? Or is it due to the aftermarket, I.e. modified spray pattern, injectors.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2013 | 08:18 PM
  #26  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
Not just injection angle, but injection phasing as was touched on before.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2013 | 04:45 AM
  #27  
Toxin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 2
From: Way ahead...
Subscribed.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2013 | 02:08 PM
  #28  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Update - I've been able to get some WOT logs, and pressure across the injectors is not holding at 58 psi at high fuel flow rates. I have fixed up the pump wiring as much as possible, and for my setup, about the best I can get is 13.1 V at the pump. With a switch from 10 gauge to 8 gauge power cable, I might be able to get it up to 13.5 V, but that's about as good as its going to get because I'm loosing roughly 0.5 V across each of the two relays that are in the power path. These are properly wired very high quality relays, so there's nothing to improve and not much to be gained even if I could improve it.

I really like the high base pressure for off-boost driving, so I'm going to have to figure out a way to make this work. I'll probably end up with a boost-a-pump to get pump voltage up to 17 V at high fuel flow. I may also look at an alternate way to connect the Walbro 416 to the factory housing to ensure I'm not loosing flow due to the grommet arrangement or due to the built-in filter causing a huge pressure drop.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2013 | 04:25 PM
  #29  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
Get that Squash double pumper and add another 416... It'll not only do your delta P of 58psi no sweat it'll also keep up during fast transients into boost.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2013 | 05:33 PM
  #30  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
Get that Squash double pumper and add another 416... It'll not only do your delta P of 58psi no sweat it'll also keep up during fast transients into boost.
I've already built my own double-pumper. Its pretty sweet actually. I was just hoping to be able to make it work with a single pump. If I install the double pumper, I'll have to redo the supply line and electrical. A boost-a-pump is not much more than connecting four wires. I'm lazy if I can be.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:29 AM.