Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

GSC R2's with Supertech duel valvetrain is a NO GO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 04:25 PM
  #31  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by browningderek
This is what i got... You can see the second "step" on the bottom of the retainer. If it were machined off like it would be with a single setup i would have enough clearance. Idk about other duels, they may be different but i would think most duel retainers have this step. Anybody got pics of another brand?

if you want i can share what the 5041's look like. i have a set here sitting. but i think the pictures are on the internet already.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 04:28 PM
  #32  
michaelrc51's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 721
Likes: 4
From: NJ
Originally Posted by tscompusa
if you want i can share what the 5041's look like. i have a set here sitting. but i think the pictures are on the internet already.
What are you waiting for?

Are they for sale?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 04:46 PM
  #33  
browningderek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: MoTown,GA
They are Tom.... They do not have that extra step. It must have been super close with my BR cams! I bet the S3's put if right at the limit.

Last edited by browningderek; Apr 7, 2013 at 04:50 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 04:52 PM
  #34  
browningderek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: MoTown,GA
http://www.power-division.com/popup_...%20all%204G63s


You can get the chromoly seats for like $30 extra
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 05:05 PM
  #35  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by browningderek
They are Tom.... They do not have that extra step. It must have been super close with my BR cams! I bet the S3's put if right at the limit.
that is crazy! i ran them on s3's! no wonder the knock sensor was going ape ****.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 05:07 PM
  #36  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by michaelrc51
What are you waiting for?

Are they for sale?
Yes I sell them. I have access to unlimited sets. I fully support anything GSC sells. They make a hell of a product for a very great price.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 05:29 PM
  #37  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by DsmGuy86
Not knocking you or your tuner but have you read anything about the cams they're meant for 2.2l and above motors not really 2.0s if you read English racings write up on them Aaron ( John Bradley the guy that did extensive testing on these) showed there's is nothing good to come from them on the 2.0 and stock frame turbos. I get a lot of ppl want the latest and greatest but these cams were designed for stroker motors and bigger turbos

Look up the right up from John Bradley is has all the info needed on these new r2s
heres the thing.

The R2's are designed not to give up any low end or spool response where as say an S3 will affect that area a good bit.

We run S3's on stock turbos and 2.0's all the time with good results. The R2's are going to be the same except they won't kill the low end as much as the s3's. It really doesn't matter if they were designed for 2.2-2.3 or not, its still going to do the same thing on a 2.0L as far as how they open the valves up. <-- the 2.2-2.3 will benefit more though of course!

i'm not a cam expert, but cams are designed to focus on certain powerband RPM ranges when they are designed, so thats why when someone mentions s3 or 280 cams they will say oh you don't want those for the stock turbo because they are designed for high RPM setups with a big turbo. you want S1's. thats true, but you still can see really great results with a mismatched camshaft. I just did a stock turbo that made 470tq on s3's on a 2L. <-- can it make more with s1? maybe, but maybe not.

I'm sure it was already said, but R2's are another option besides the s3's for someone who wants all they can get for response and low/midrange without sacrificing top end as much. so the R2 is like a fine tuned s2 to get the best of both worlds. but the R2 will still not be able to give the same top end as the s3's. I even read Aaron @ English say that himself and if anyone knows he does 100%. Him and Lucas helped design them!

So the way i see an R2 is, its a highly advanced S2/S3 hybrid that is close to the S3 as far as top end goes with low end like a S2, and thats why GSC is calling it a game changer, because it is. no other cam manufacturer has tuned their cam profile like that to make low end good and almost have the same top end as larger 280's that suffer downlow to my knowledge.

im sure if you drove both s3 then R2, you would see a huge difference in how the car responds downlow/midrange, and understand why people are going to move to R2's and stay with R2's. i would imagine if GSC ever releases an R3, its going to be a fine tuned S3 with more kick downlow/mid but not lose any top end if thats possible.

again im not a cam expert, and im sure theres others that posted in here that know a lot more about cams then i do, but im just posting how i see the R2's and why they were designed.

in short, its a big *** cam that has more low/midrange power and still offers the same as bigger ones do uptop for the most part. best of both worlds.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 05:35 PM
  #38  
browningderek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: MoTown,GA
And you valve train better be right when you install these cams! Not a bolt in and go situation.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 05:38 PM
  #39  
EvilTechnology's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (64)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 745
Likes: 1
From: WA Seattle toolanddyedesigns.com
Given that I have S3's on the way, what springs should I go with? GSC 5041 or kiggly?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 05:40 PM
  #40  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by browningderek
And you valve train better be right when you install these cams! Not a bolt in and go situation.
ya honestly i would just go for the GSC 5041's that way you know 100% you're using the right stuff.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 05:41 PM
  #41  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by EvilTechnology
Given that I have S3's on the way, what springs should I go with? GSC 5041 or kiggly?
I'm running Kiggly's with my s3's now, but i've done a lot of cars with s3's with the 5041 kit and they run great with no abnormal knock volume.

my vote would be the GSC 5041 set.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 05:42 PM
  #42  
EvoJoeIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 2
From: Maryland
Also take into account that you WILL need headwork for these cams. Running a stock ported head on these is a waste as it cant flow well enough to take advantage of anything over 11mm of lift.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 05:42 PM
  #43  
michaelrc51's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 721
Likes: 4
From: NJ
Originally Posted by tscompusa
Yes I sell them. I have access to unlimited sets. I fully support anything GSC sells. They make a hell of a product for a very great price.
OK, I will PM you......This means my tune will be in another week or 2....LOL, this is never ending.
I can't wait to be done with this and drive the car for a while!

So, what do you think...will the 5041 solve our problem? Would I need new seal with that as well?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 05:48 PM
  #44  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by EvoJoeIX
Also take into account that you WILL need headwork for these cams. Running a stock ported head on these is a waste as it cant flow well enough to take advantage of anything over 11mm of lift.
this isn't true. the s3's are proof of that (11.7 lift). i have so many cars on stock heads making huge power on s3's.

i guess its true in a way that with proper head porting you will benefit way more from them, but saying you 100% need headwork or you won't see anything from these makes no sense to me.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2013 | 05:56 PM
  #45  
EvoJoeIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 2
From: Maryland
The s3 makes power on a stock head because its keeping the valve open at 11mm for a longer duration then the stock cam, not because its lifting it to 11.7, same with an s2.

I talked to arron about these cams weeks ago and what i posted was exactly what he told me.

Last edited by EvoJoeIX; Apr 7, 2013 at 06:02 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:56 PM.