Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

2.3 vs 2.4 - why do some shops really dislike the 2.4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 09:45 AM
  #91  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by tscompusa
No problem

Everyone uses off the shelf headgaskets.
Not just the gasket or if you O-ring it. There is more to it than that. 52psi on a 2.4 is doable when the formula is there.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 10:48 AM
  #92  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Great info.


Originally Posted by wc351
I completely agree, coming from the Mustang world, different years and even different plants had huge differences in the blocks. So that is why I was curious. Thanks for the reply.

I remember scuttlebutt about different casting quality between a Mitsubishi block vs a Hyundai or Kia sourced block and whether or not the cranks (or blocks) were nitrided (perhaps Mitsubishi Evo 4G63 only). But I guess that was all inconsequential in a well built engine or not true.

Last edited by GPTourer; Jan 10, 2014 at 04:12 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 12:06 PM
  #93  
2001gslp's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Mass
Now, I have a question. I'm in the process of building a 4g64 with a g4js head. All of this talk about head gaskets and such is making me wonder, why not use an oem 4g64 head gasket? Assuming that they are the same material and thickness as one another, so why not? IIRC, the oem 4g63 head gasket can hold up to quite a bit of power, comparing them to cometic, cosworth, power enterprise, etc, etc.

Last edited by 2001gslp; Jan 10, 2014 at 12:10 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 12:27 PM
  #94  
Faisalm's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 851
Likes: 2
From: US
Originally Posted by 2001gslp
Now, I have a question. I'm in the process of building a 4g64 with a g4js head. All of this talk about head gaskets and such is making me wonder, why not use an oem 4g64 head gasket? Assuming that they are the same material and thickness as one another, so why not? IIRC, the oem 4g63 head gasket can hold up to quite a bit of power, comparing them to cometic, cosworth, power enterprise, etc, etc.
I think it's because if you use the OEM 4g64 head gasket it wouldn't line properly with the 4g63 head therefore causing malfunctions and whatnot... You would need a modified 4g63 head gasket I think. I'm not sure though it's what I understood from previous threads and discussions.

I'm not a professional or anything of that sort, just an enthusiast :P
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 04:09 PM
  #95  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Not just the gasket or if you O-ring it. There is more to it than that. 52psi on a 2.4 is doable when the formula is there.
Ya compression and strengthening the block would be important also for high power.

One of your local customers running a 2.4LR that had a hg issue told Steve (isah5leeper on here) you guys O-ringed him to resolve the issue. It was in response to the thread Steve made asking the community if he should oring or not before he puts on the t3 6466 kit.

It seems to me most people running a lot of boost and power on a 4g64 block are all oringed. (not all but a lot) I oringed my head because it was oringed before on my 4g63 block, so i just had Buschur's machine shop re-oring my new head like the old one was.

I'm a firm believer in Orings. I know some people are fully against them though. But since i had them in my old setup and no issues, there's no reason to not reuse what has worked before.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 04:20 PM
  #96  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by 2001gslp
Now, I have a question. I'm in the process of building a 4g64 with a g4js head. All of this talk about head gaskets and such is making me wonder, why not use an oem 4g64 head gasket? Assuming that they are the same material and thickness as one another, so why not? IIRC, the oem 4g63 head gasket can hold up to quite a bit of power, comparing them to cometic, cosworth, power enterprise, etc, etc.
The composite 4g64 headgaskets are only good for up to 86mm I believe. Most people with 2.4's are running them atleast .020 over because that's what they require usually to fully clean up at. So that makes them 87mm.

I never researched into a 4g64 headgasket, until just now quick, but it looks like the stock 4g64 HG is composite and not MLS and can not handle boost well at all.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 04:26 PM
  #97  
5LEEPERISAH23I's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 1
From: Malvern, PA
Originally Posted by tscompusa
Ya compression and strengthening the block would be important also for high power.

One of your local customers running a 2.4LR that had a hg issue told Steve (isah5leeper on here) you guys O-ringed him to resolve the issue. It was in response to the thread Steve made asking the community if he should oring or not before he puts on the t3 6466 kit.

It seems to me most people running a lot of boost and power on a 4g64 block are all oringed. (not all but a lot) I oringed my head because it was oringed before on my 4g63 block, so i just had Buschur's machine shop re-oring my new head like the old one was.

I'm a firm believer in Orings. I know some people are fully against them though. But since i had them in my old setup and no issues, there's no reason to not reuse what has worked before.

I also know personally 4-5 people on this forum with 4g64 blocks running O-rings with no problems "all making over 650whp." 2 of them ran non o-ringed heads before and nothing but problems. Don't want start a argument over this but I choose to get a o-ringed head when doing my T3 6466 build.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 06:52 PM
  #98  
batty200's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 5
I used a stock HG from a late model 4G64. It is a 2 layer metal gasket. I have no issues. It will raise compression compared to a thicker gasket. I don't know if more or less layers helps sealing better but mine was good at approx 565whp. I hope to push it so much harder once my clutch can handle more power
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 07:04 PM
  #99  
silver9mr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 1
From: lowell,MA
Originally Posted by tscompusa
Ya compression and strengthening the block would be important also for high power.

One of your local customers running a 2.4LR that had a hg issue told Steve (isah5leeper on here) you guys O-ringed him to resolve the issue. It was in response to the thread Steve made asking the community if he should oring or not before he puts on the t3 6466 kit.

It seems to me most people running a lot of boost and power on a 4g64 block are all oringed. (not all but a lot) I oringed my head because it was oringed before on my 4g63 block, so i just had Buschur's machine shop re-oring my new head like the old one was.

I'm a firm believer in Orings. I know some people are fully against them though. But since i had them in my old setup and no issues, there's no reason to not reuse what has worked before.

so whats considered high boost for the 2.4? I plan on seeing 32-34 most.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2014 | 07:17 PM
  #100  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by silver9mr
so whats considered high boost for the 2.4? I plan on seeing 32-34 most.
Id say that is high boost. 32-34psi if you are holding that to redline.

anything over 30psi to redline would be high boost to me.

Id like to try to run near 40psi when Im at the drag strip with my new setup if i can get used to the power.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2014 | 12:41 AM
  #101  
DsmGuy86's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Roy, WA
Originally Posted by tscompusa
Ya compression and strengthening the block would be important also for high power.

One of your local customers running a 2.4LR that had a hg issue told Steve (isah5leeper on here) you guys O-ringed him to resolve the issue. It was in response to the thread Steve made asking the community if he should oring or not before he puts on the t3 6466 kit.

It seems to me most people running a lot of boost and power on a 4g64 block are all oringed. (not all but a lot) I oringed my head because it was oringed before on my 4g63 block, so i just had Buschur's machine shop re-oring my new head like the old one was.

I'm a firm believer in Orings. I know some people are fully against them though. But since i had them in my old setup and no issues, there's no reason to not reuse what has worked before.
Hey tom not to tred to far off topic but I'm about to start a 2.4lr build and thought that O-ringing would be a good idea and on paper it seems to be. But what are the reasons that have others completely against it? Sorry again for a somewhat off topic question.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2014 | 04:14 PM
  #102  
kpt6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (127)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 684
Likes: 77
From: U.S.A.
Originally Posted by DsmGuy86
Hey tom not to tred to far off topic but I'm about to start a 2.4lr build and thought that O-ringing would be a good idea and on paper it seems to be. But what are the reasons that have others completely against it? Sorry again for a somewhat off topic question.
It's on topic enough for me! All this info is great- the more, the better! I really appreciate everyone's input- thanks guys!
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2014 | 05:34 PM
  #103  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by DsmGuy86
Hey tom not to tred to far off topic but I'm about to start a 2.4lr build and thought that O-ringing would be a good idea and on paper it seems to be. But what are the reasons that have others completely against it? Sorry again for a somewhat off topic question.
I did it on mine. I never had an issue with O-rings, so ill keep using them until i have an issue that proves otherwise.

Those that who are against them, are against them for using them in the wrong way. Not necessarily against O-ringing in general.

I never had an issue with mine, so until I experience an issue with my personal car, then ill continue to use what has been working for me.

I have no problem alerting the community when/if I have any issues with my car. I share everything if I feel it will help someone else out. As do many other vendors on here. That's what makes the evo community so open and resourceful.

Technically speaking, when the head and block surface are perfectly flat, an MLS gasket should be all that's necessary to fully seal the HG.

Last edited by tscompusa; Jan 11, 2014 at 08:16 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2014 | 09:12 PM
  #104  
DsmGuy86's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Roy, WA
Originally Posted by tscompusa
I did it on mine. I never had an issue with O-rings, so ill keep using them until i have an issue that proves otherwise.

Those that who are against them, are against them for using them in the wrong way. Not necessarily against O-ringing in general.

I never had an issue with mine, so until I experience an issue with my personal car, then ill continue to use what has been working for me.

I have no problem alerting the community when/if I have any issues with my car. I share everything if I feel it will help someone else out. As do many other vendors on here. That's what makes the evo community so open and resourceful.

Technically speaking, when the head and block surface are perfectly flat, an MLS gasket should be all that's necessary to fully seal the HG.
Thanks Tom. I'll continue to plan to do O-ringing then, since I would like to be able to run 37-40psi..just seems like a good bet to me
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CT9A PR
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
2
Dec 2, 2015 08:04 AM
Pirana
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
17
Dec 8, 2013 04:41 PM
RjRacing05
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
8
Jun 3, 2013 02:21 PM
acssa
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
30
Jan 21, 2013 01:20 PM
crcain
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
3
Apr 29, 2009 12:38 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:24 AM.