Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Let's Talk About Rods, Shall We Boys?

Old Mar 7, 2014, 11:28 PM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
High_PSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,084
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Let's Talk About Rods, Shall We Boys?

Hey guys thanks for responding to my want ad, ermmmm thread question. That said I am finally looking to build my Evo IX Engine as I plan to be making well over 500WHP this summer and 450+ Pounds of torque. Now I know the stock block can handle a lot but I am looking for insurance. I am thinking just some simple drop in's will do but I am unclear on what a good rod for my purpose.

My mods are basic bolt-ons but I have a FP Red and I plan on 29PSI as I am already running it without much detonation, if any. Also I plan I using an Old School VSR and some serious cams so my WHP as of now is 460 and torque is a solid 400, I plan to add 50+ to both and that just may end my day.

I took a look over on FleaBay and they have the typical Eagle Rod/Weisco Piston combo for $750 but I am uncertain that those rods are much stronger than stock (They Are Lighter)

Step up to Manley Rods and the same pistons for $900. Both the Eagle and Mannley setup are H beams but I suppose Mannley is superior? I even read that these are the same exact rods just a different name on it, so I am kinds lost.

Basically I plan on staying with a stock frame turbo and stock displacement, I don't see myself going crazy sized single scroll turbos with tons of lag and poor drive-ability, I just need something that will last on a drop in basis.


Thanks again guys.
Old Mar 8, 2014, 03:25 AM
  #2  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
ReidFletcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 315
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Do it once do it right. Manley h-tuff or turbo tuffs and 1400hd pistons. I believe in over building as it's cheaper to do it once than twice.
Old Mar 8, 2014, 04:05 AM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
AreSTG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PA/NC
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
only thing I'd say is if you are going to keep the power where you say, you really don't need the added weight of turbo tuffs. They are strong as heck, no doubt, and I run them, but they're heavy. If an H-beam meets your requirements go with the lighter rods that won't beat up bearings as fast.
Old Mar 8, 2014, 04:40 AM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
jason42003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: fairbanks, ak
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I remember a member said that he contacted Manley and they told him the h-beams are only rated for 500ft-lbs of torque. So if your torque will be close to your hp goals then that would be too close for me. I have the h-beam rods and even 450 is too close for my tastes which is why I'm lowering my power goals. The turbo tuffs will hold more power but if you want ultimate rod strength Manley 300m rods are rated for 1500 hp. Just a few options for rods. There are many more such as Carrillo but Manley are the ones I know most of.
Old Mar 8, 2014, 05:15 AM
  #5  
Newbie
 
Pitside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: STL
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Go with Turbo Tuff I-Beams and call it a day. You will have added security and if you every decide to upgrade power levels the engine is already done.

I went with the Tuff I-beams and 1400hd pistons, its been proven a solid build over and over again.

I would also recommend Curt Brown Racing to perform the services for you!
Old Mar 8, 2014, 07:29 AM
  #6  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
High_PSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,084
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
As always it's the cost. What I can't understand is how a MANLEY H Beam rod is barely stronger than a OEM Rod? I mean only 500 FT Pounds? I thought they were stronger than that?
Old Mar 8, 2014, 07:50 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
EvoDan2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
I have been running oliver rods for 5 years. I just pulled them out and had them check and they are still perfect. My SIG shows how I abuse them. The car makes over 650trq and the oliver rods are much lighter then most other companies. I would recommend them.
Old Mar 8, 2014, 12:39 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
the cheaper k1, manley, eagle, scat rods will handle 500tq all day long. I like the scat rods best. there are very few threads of broke rods. and most of them can be attributed to abuse or poor tuning.
Old Mar 8, 2014, 03:16 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
 
Benja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Newcastle, Australia.
Posts: 800
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed.
On a 2L especially, the cheaper H-Beams will do the job fine.

I tend to focus more on weight when upsizing rods also.
Old Mar 8, 2014, 03:18 PM
  #10  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,332
Received 57 Likes on 44 Posts
Originally Posted by High_PSI
As always it's the cost. What I can't understand is how a MANLEY H Beam rod is barely stronger than a OEM Rod? I mean only 500 FT Pounds? I thought they were stronger than that?
It's simple. These rods, as well as Eagle, K1, Scat, Brian Crower, and various others are forged in China, and that metallurgy is not subject to the same QA/QC and SAE standards as the more expensive, professional-grade rods (e.g. Oliver, Arrow, Carillo, etc.). Manley is well aware of the limitations, and they don't disguise it. They'd rather steer high specific output applications away from budget rod options. Call them about it, and they're completely transparent. Their Turbo Tuff option is heavy for my liking, but it's cost effective. It's easy to make a lightweight rod and it's easy to make a strong rod, but it's neither easy nor cheap to make one that is both lightweight and strong...and using top-tier metallurgy.

Does that mean a 4G63 that generates 500 ft/lbs from only 4-cyls will snap a Manley H-beam rod? Not necessarily, but it isn't the best option, and there's no sense in pretending that it is. I'm with evodan2004 here in that I never take the cheap seats when it comes to critical rotating components, but that's a personal m.o. I also have a set of Oliver billets (156mm - 575g - E4340), and I'll probably will them to my grandchildren.

Just FYI.
Old Mar 8, 2014, 03:21 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
 
Benja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Newcastle, Australia.
Posts: 800
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well said.
My Carrillo Pro-H's were mid 500's in the same length also
Old Mar 8, 2014, 09:47 PM
  #12  
Newbie
 
nursebetty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
buy nice or buy twice!
Old Mar 8, 2014, 11:23 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
batty200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Crower billet rods are made in USA. Brian Crower H beam rods might be the same Chinese rods as the eagle and Manley H beam but not Crower.
Old Mar 9, 2014, 12:53 AM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Ted B
It's simple. These rods, as well as Eagle, K1, Scat, Brian Crower, and various others are forged in China, and that metallurgy is not subject to the same QA/QC and SAE standards as the more expensive, professional-grade rods (e.g. Oliver, Arrow, Carillo, etc.). Manley is well aware of the limitations, and they don't disguise it. They'd rather steer high specific output applications away from budget rod options. Call them about it, and they're completely transparent. Their Turbo Tuff option is heavy for my liking, but it's cost effective. It's easy to make a lightweight rod and it's easy to make a strong rod, but it's neither easy nor cheap to make one that is both lightweight and strong...and using top-tier metallurgy.

Does that mean a 4G63 that generates 500 ft/lbs from only 4-cyls will snap a Manley H-beam rod? Not necessarily, but it isn't the best option, and there's no sense in pretending that it is. I'm with evodan2004 here in that I never take the cheap seats when it comes to critical rotating components, but that's a personal m.o. I also have a set of Oliver billets (156mm - 575g - E4340), and I'll probably will them to my grandchildren.

Just FYI.
I am speaking from nearly 20 years of 4g63 experience.

I think everyone is aware the cheaper rods are not equal to a more expensive billet ones. I have some scat rods that have lasted through three motors and they are still as new. they have seen 567tq and better. I will likely will them to my children. there are plenty of threads on dsm forums were people arent money thrift like evo crowd. plenty of feedback of 800-900whp motors using them without failures. if you ad up all the 4g63 rods being used. there are likely 20 times more eagle rods in use than anything else. yet rod failure threads are just as prevalent with higher priced billet rods.

if you want the extra insurance and have the extra cash by all means buy a more expensive rod. but power wise is certainly not the reason they are needed. and its certainly not a "not if but when will they fail" type of thing either. the cheaper rods have an extremely good track record of working very well in high hp motors without failure. they are night and day STRONG over a stock rod. I would rate a stock rod safe at 350tq. anything over that and it is a "not if but when" rod. I would rate an eagle rod at "all day long" at 600tq. they are that good and that much better than a stock rod.

and another important point is the more expensive rods do not save you when the build/tune goes south. if you spin a bearing your 750 dollar rod will be just as ruined as the 300 one. its just a more expensive lesson.

Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Mar 9, 2014 at 01:10 AM.
Old Mar 9, 2014, 11:07 AM
  #15  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
High_PSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,084
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
I am speaking from nearly 20 years of 4g63 experience.

I think everyone is aware the cheaper rods are not equal to a more expensive billet ones. I have some scat rods that have lasted through three motors and they are still as new. they have seen 567tq and better. I will likely will them to my children. there are plenty of threads on dsm forums were people arent money thrift like evo crowd. plenty of feedback of 800-900whp motors using them without failures. if you ad up all the 4g63 rods being used. there are likely 20 times more eagle rods in use than anything else. yet rod failure threads are just as prevalent with higher priced billet rods.

if you want the extra insurance and have the extra cash by all means buy a more expensive rod. but power wise is certainly not the reason they are needed. and its certainly not a "not if but when will they fail" type of thing either. the cheaper rods have an extremely good track record of working very well in high hp motors without failure. they are night and day STRONG over a stock rod. I would rate a stock rod safe at 350tq. anything over that and it is a "not if but when" rod. I would rate an eagle rod at "all day long" at 600tq. they are that good and that much better than a stock rod.

and another important point is the more expensive rods do not save you when the build/tune goes south. if you spin a bearing your 750 dollar rod will be just as ruined as the 300 one. its just a more expensive lesson.
OK well I'll never reach 600 Wheel torque at least I don't think I will. Eagle H Beams and Manley H Beams are the same?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Let's Talk About Rods, Shall We Boys?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:43 PM.