Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

10:1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2014 | 11:58 AM
  #1  
siemens03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 1
From: arkansas
10:1?

I have been reading a lot and still don't fully understand what would be better for my build seems like half say 9:1 and the other half 10:1.
2.3 stroker
Gsc s2 cams and springs
Bb fp red
Supporting fuel system exhaust all that
Ported intake and tb
I can't get e85 very close to home though I can get it.
I would like to have a map switch.
My car will be a dd and weekend drag car sometimes
Should I go 10:1 or stay 9:1?
I'll probably take the car to evo dynamics because they seem reputable and somewhat close.
I'm in Knoxville ar 72845.
They said I should stay at 9:1 and I'm not opposed to taking it somewhere else if someone knows of a better place within about 10 hours from me. Thanks in advance.
I have done a ton of reading and searching by the way. Just still unsure.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2014 | 12:10 PM
  #2  
Faisalm's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 851
Likes: 2
From: US
I believe it was Buschur who said that there was no difference in drivability between a 9.0:1 or a 10.5:1, which he proved with his RS multiple times. I would go with the 10:1 if you're going to use E85 at some point. I've had low and high compression pistons on my engine and for some reason, I prefer the high compression, even on pump gas.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2014 | 12:24 PM
  #3  
evolutme's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Victorville
If you're going to run 91/93 consistently I would just run 9:1. Pump Gas on 10:1 doesn't seem very fun.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2014 | 01:34 PM
  #4  
Faisalm's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 851
Likes: 2
From: US
Originally Posted by evolutme
If you're going to run 91/93 consistently I would just run 9:1. Pump Gas on 10:1 doesn't seem very fun.
I have a 10:1 on 93 oct. Very fun indeed
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2014 | 01:48 PM
  #5  
meckert's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 5
From: Denton, Tx
OP, its your build and you have a recommendation from your builder--- Now, what do you see as the perceived benefits for a 10:1 motor. I ask this because if you cant think of at least 2 things immediately off the top of your head then stick with what EVO-D recommended. Your looking those guys in the eyes and they are backing the build. Nothing against the forum here, but your not working with them and their opinion provides no vested interest in the result. Again , go with the recommendation of the builder, if you have questions run it by them for their view since there is a big difference between arm chair racing and function. Good Luck.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2014 | 02:25 PM
  #6  
siemens03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 1
From: arkansas
I am the builder they are the tuner. What's to say they just haven't done any/many 10:1. I do all my own work except tuning. More compression makes it better to drive off boost or the effect that it drives better off boost. These are questions I want more information on. Buschur swears by it. A lot of people say it's great some say it doesn't. I want more direct information.
More info faisalm
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2014 | 03:01 PM
  #7  
siemens03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 1
From: arkansas
That was just a place not too awfully far to drive. No specific reason why I chose them.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2014 | 04:19 PM
  #8  
evolutme's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Victorville
Originally Posted by Faisalm
I have a 10:1 on 93 oct. Very fun indeed
I guess it's just cause I'm stuck with this fish **** 91 oct we have here in California.
I went 10.5:1 on my build running a fp black. Plan on just running E85, 91 in case of an emergency. Lol
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2014 | 04:55 PM
  #9  
boni426's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Saratoga, NY
if you are planning on e85 or race gas 10:1 will be fine.. on 91/93 i would be much more worried about durability.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2014 | 08:22 PM
  #10  
siemens03's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 1
From: arkansas
Ok let's try pros and cons. Opinions of people who have ran both comp ratios.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 03:47 AM
  #11  
nismo3183's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 133
Likes: 2
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by siemens03
Ok let's try pros and cons. Opinions of people who have ran both comp ratios.
If you search you will find a thread that Aaron "JohnBradley" posted in. He states the pros and cons about compression, especially when tuning. It is a very good read especially if you do not understand how CR and ignition timing are related. For the record I chose 9.5:1 on my slr 2.2l and my motor will see 93 and e85.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 06:15 AM
  #12  
batty200's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 5
Mitsubishi had gone up to 9:1 on a previous version of the EVO and went back to 8.8:1. For a pump gas car I would stay with stock compression or lower. Stock 1G DSM is 7.8:1 and they can make a lot of power on pump with boost. I have 10.5:1 because I run E85 almost exclusively.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 07:52 AM
  #13  
EvoJoeIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 2
From: Maryland
I run 10.5:1 and my car runs on 93 most of the time
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 08:29 AM
  #14  
evolve_VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 456
Likes: 2
From: michigan
I had 10.6:1 running pump and e85. Switched it to 10:1 for more pump since its not available in canada.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 05:24 PM
  #15  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
The knock threshhold with higher compression and pumpgas doesnt math out. 1 full point of compression according the old hot rod rule is around 4% more power and this holds true in our engines as well. So if you have a 9:1 motor that makes 600whp it theoretically will make 624 with compression. It feels no different down low, doesnt affect transient response, and really makes life more difficult on pumpgas.

Here is why-

92 octane WA/OR and some Midwest 91 octane are limited to 28psi give or take on a 9:1 motor. On a 10:1 motor that threshold drops to 20-21psi and then its all about the combination in order to run that. I have used det-cans, I can read plugs, I have tuned cars with stock knock control settings and watched voltage vs counts, I am not giving aberrant data.

Here is a 9:1 LR2.4 with a 3586 at 19psi, 25psi, and 28psi -



Giving the 19.25psi the benefit of the doubt and say it made 5% more power with a 10:1 motor but was limited to that boost, would 545whp (519x1.05) be as much fun as running 28psi?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:11 PM.