Just what the subject says!
http://www.liquidice.net/evo/dyno.htm



Done on an AWD Dynapack, 4th gear, 93 octane, 21 psi at
http://www.redshiftmotorsports.com

Next step, some more fine tuning and adjusting my cam gears!

 

Nice numbers man! How's your tranny doing? I'm considering having sheperd rebuild mine as well.

Let us know how everything works out after you adjust those gears and fine tune it!

 

Nice numbers.

What kind of gas? How much boost?

It seems like the 272 guys are making better numbers on the stock turbo than the 264. Everyone else seemed to say that the difference is negligible. How is your idle?

Edit: Just saw that it was made on 93 octane. Sweet.

 

Tranny is like butta! Props to John Sheperd.
Those pulls were done at 21psi. About 11.8-12:1 afr.
Idle is nice at 800-900 sounds mean as hell!
I'm pretty impressed with those numbers since I was hoping to see 340whp.

 

Nice. You've convinced me: I'm ordering 272s instead of 264s. They seem to be easier to get ahold of anyway.

 

Damn nice #'s..I would love to hear a sound clip!!!

 

The 272/272 setup is nice, 2nd car I've had them on...

 

I also wanted to add that during a shakedown run at 15psi the car made 311 whp... That made me chuckle.

 

nice #s. what do you think you can get in the 1/4 mile ??

 

Dude, I bet that **** pulls like nobody's business....

 

It would be nice to see it run an 11.99 on pump. I dunno if it will, but race gas and some more psi should make it possible.

 

Sounds nice but we can't see the dyno graph. What cam timming did you use?

 

Did Chris do any tuning or did you just do a few runs??

I will be up at RedShift this week sometime to take a few Dyno pulls and a few adjustments to the Emanage.

 

We did change fueling a little bit to be safe. We did a few runs that were cut short because of high 13 a/f ratios at full boost. That Evo is one of the best sounding cars I've ever heard. Looking forward to have it back someday.

Oh, and btw, the dyno we use is a Dynapack, not a Dynojet. The power he saw was real power, without the help of long sweep times or artificial sae correction. If I'm not mistaken, the SAE correction was only 2% or so.... very much within the range of being accurate and reasonable and as SAE intended.

Congrats on a good setup so far.
Chris

 

Those are really numbers...
After reading this thread, I will definetely be going with 272s..

Memo