Dyno results 369.9 whp / 347.5 tq
Mar 14, 2004, 03:30 PM
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NE PA
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno results 369.9 whp / 347.5 tq
Just what the subject says!
http://www.liquidice.net/evo/dyno.htm
Done on an AWD Dynapack, 4th gear, 93 octane, 21 psi at
http://www.redshiftmotorsports.com
Next step, some more fine tuning and adjusting my cam gears!
http://www.liquidice.net/evo/dyno.htm
Done on an AWD Dynapack, 4th gear, 93 octane, 21 psi at
http://www.redshiftmotorsports.com
Next step, some more fine tuning and adjusting my cam gears!
Last edited by smackdaddy; Sep 20, 2005 at 09:36 AM.
Mar 14, 2004, 03:33 PM
#2
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ocean, NJ
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice numbers man! How's your tranny doing? I'm considering having sheperd rebuild mine as well.
Let us know how everything works out after you adjust those gears and fine tune it!
Let us know how everything works out after you adjust those gears and fine tune it!
Mar 14, 2004, 03:34 PM
#3
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DE
Posts: 2,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice numbers.
What kind of gas? How much boost?
It seems like the 272 guys are making better numbers on the stock turbo than the 264. Everyone else seemed to say that the difference is negligible. How is your idle?
Edit: Just saw that it was made on 93 octane. Sweet.
What kind of gas? How much boost?
It seems like the 272 guys are making better numbers on the stock turbo than the 264. Everyone else seemed to say that the difference is negligible. How is your idle?
Edit: Just saw that it was made on 93 octane. Sweet.
Last edited by MrBonus; Mar 14, 2004 at 03:36 PM.
Mar 14, 2004, 03:51 PM
#4
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NE PA
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tranny is like butta! Props to John Sheperd.
Those pulls were done at 21psi. About 11.8-12:1 afr.
Idle is nice at 800-900 sounds mean as hell!
I'm pretty impressed with those numbers since I was hoping to see 340whp.
Those pulls were done at 21psi. About 11.8-12:1 afr.
Idle is nice at 800-900 sounds mean as hell!
I'm pretty impressed with those numbers since I was hoping to see 340whp.
Last edited by smackdaddy; Sep 20, 2005 at 09:37 AM.
Trending Topics
Mar 14, 2004, 07:37 PM
#13
Re: Dyno results 369.9 whp / 347.5 tq
Originally posted by smackdaddy
Done on an AWD Dynojet, 4th gear, 93 octane, 21 psi at
http://www.redshiftmotorsports.com
Done on an AWD Dynojet, 4th gear, 93 octane, 21 psi at
http://www.redshiftmotorsports.com
I will be up at RedShift this week sometime to take a few Dyno pulls and a few adjustments to the Emanage.
Mar 14, 2004, 09:10 PM
#14
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northeast PA
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
evo dyno
We did change fueling a little bit to be safe. We did a few runs that were cut short because of high 13 a/f ratios at full boost. That Evo is one of the best sounding cars I've ever heard. Looking forward to have it back someday.
Oh, and btw, the dyno we use is a Dynapack, not a Dynojet. The power he saw was real power, without the help of long sweep times or artificial sae correction. If I'm not mistaken, the SAE correction was only 2% or so.... very much within the range of being accurate and reasonable and as SAE intended.
Congrats on a good setup so far.
Chris
Oh, and btw, the dyno we use is a Dynapack, not a Dynojet. The power he saw was real power, without the help of long sweep times or artificial sae correction. If I'm not mistaken, the SAE correction was only 2% or so.... very much within the range of being accurate and reasonable and as SAE intended.
Congrats on a good setup so far.
Chris
