Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

htuff rods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2018 | 09:36 PM
  #31  
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
Crank bearings failed?
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2018 | 02:59 AM
  #32  
inin36's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 79
Likes: 4
From: Singapore
yes it did.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2018 | 04:09 AM
  #33  
RS200's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 622
Likes: 118
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Originally Posted by inin36
9k. acl bearings. was on motul xcess iirc when it gave way


can share link for the recommendation?
http://www.dsmtuners.com/threads/man...f-rods.499390/
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2018 | 11:58 AM
  #34  
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
Originally Posted by inin36
yes it did.
That doesn't make sense. It doesn't seem like the cause is the rod and piston combo. And oil seems odd too since their purpose is to lubricate.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2018 | 01:12 PM
  #35  
Pal215's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,925
Likes: 361
From: San Diego, CA
Main bearing failure is more rare than rod bearing failure, but it can happen under a few circumstances.

1. The main bearing oil clearance was not set properly
2. The Crank was bent
3. Loss of oil pressure/oil film strength
4. Bearing crush pressure was lost due to improper torque spec on main studs, causing the cradle to back off (highly unlikely with single piece, cast iron cradles)

On the rod bearing side the list is similar, but it's much easier to spin a rod bearing because all what's needed is to stretch a rod bolt.


I'm sure that I beams will cause the rod bolts to stretch faster than lighter weight rods, but if you keep your engine low reving (7500 - 8000rpm) it won't be too much of an issue.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2018 | 07:45 PM
  #36  
inin36's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 79
Likes: 4
From: Singapore
Originally Posted by 2006EvoIXer
That doesn't make sense. It doesn't seem like the cause is the rod and piston combo. And oil seems odd too since their purpose is to lubricate.
Im not sure of what the exact caused as i left it to my mech to work on it. was told its the oil.

Originally Posted by Pal215
Main bearing failure is more rare than rod bearing failure, but it can happen under a few circumstances.

1. The main bearing oil clearance was not set properly
2. The Crank was bent
3. Loss of oil pressure/oil film strength
4. Bearing crush pressure was lost due to improper torque spec on main studs, causing the cradle to back off (highly unlikely with single piece, cast iron cradles)

On the rod bearing side the list is similar, but it's much easier to spin a rod bearing because all what's needed is to stretch a rod bolt.


I'm sure that I beams will cause the rod bolts to stretch faster than lighter weight rods, but if you keep your engine low reving (7500 - 8000rpm) it won't be too much of an issue.
Thanks for the info the engine was 3 to 4 years old after rebuilt. The crank wasnt bent but definitely there was loss of oil press.

Let me share what had happened.
i had 2.0 built engine and was using amsoil and motul 300v. the car was running t3 gt37 pushing 700hp for few years and had no issue. changed to fp black and used motul xcess got it tuned 2 days later before the bearings give way.
i had few frenly drag with some frens, 1st run was fine, after 2nd run the oil temp shoot pass 110, water temp was only 86 and oil pressure drop below 1.3bar. let it cool down and check oil and radiator. topped up few ml of oil. Start again, at idle, it shot passed 110 within 1min. decided to call it a day while on the way back, the engine was vibrating badly, oil press fluctuated and oil temp hovers at 115 so i suspected either oil pump gave way or oil gotten thin.. stopped somewhere after bearings gave way and got it towed to my mechanic. During the runs, i was on low boost - 1.5bar and shift gears at only 7.5krpm.

So i decided on 2.2kit. Gotten htuff which is thicker than normal h beams but there wasnt much info on this rod. Wish to know before tune and how far i can push it.

Last edited by inin36; Mar 21, 2018 at 07:51 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2018 | 08:08 PM
  #37  
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
Originally Posted by inin36
Im not sure of what the exact caused as i left it to my mech to work on it. was told its the oil.



Thanks for the info the engine was 3 to 4 years old after rebuilt. The crank wasnt bent but definitely there was loss of oil press.

Let me share what had happened.
i had 2.0 built engine and was using amsoil and motul 300v. the car was running t3 gt37 pushing 700hp for few years and had no issue. changed to fp black and used motul xcess got it tuned 2 days later before the bearings give way.
i had few frenly drag with some frens, 1st run was fine, after 2nd run the oil temp shoot pass 110, water temp was only 86 and oil pressure drop below 1.3bar. let it cool down and check oil and radiator. topped up few ml of oil. Start again, at idle, it shot passed 110 within 1min. decided to call it a day while on the way back, the engine was vibrating badly, oil press fluctuated and oil temp hovers at 115 so i suspected either oil pump gave way or oil gotten thin.. stopped somewhere after bearings gave way and got it towed to my mechanic. During the runs, i was on low boost - 1.5bar and shift gears at only 7.5krpm.

So i decided on 2.2kit. Gotten htuff which is thicker than normal h beams but there wasnt much info on this rod. Wish to know before tune and how far i can push it.
What was the specs of your old engine (if you don't mind giving out that info)?
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2018 | 08:26 PM
  #38  
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
How is your new 2.2 kit compared to 2.0? Is it bored bigger or stroked?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2018 | 02:15 AM
  #39  
kikiturbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 316
From: Croatia
Originally Posted by 2006EvoIXer
How is your new 2.2 kit compared to 2.0? Is it bored bigger or stroked?

2.2 is 94 mm crank...
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2018 | 08:01 AM
  #40  
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
Originally Posted by kikiturbo
2.2 is 94 mm crank...
And I assume pistons are about 86.25 mm to get 2.196 L or 86.5 mm to get 2.2096 L?

Crank/rod radius increases by 3.4%. And goal rev linit is still 9000 RPM?

I think proportion to 1.997 L, 9000 RPM should be reduced to 8426 RPM. Otherwise, it's like pushing your 2.0 L 9000 RPM to 9614 RPM.

Last edited by 2006EvoIXer; Mar 22, 2018 at 08:15 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2018 | 08:46 AM
  #41  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Max bore size on 4g63 is 86mm. .020" over (85.5mm) with 94mm crank is ~2.16L.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2018 | 06:57 PM
  #42  
inin36's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 79
Likes: 4
From: Singapore
yeap 94mm crank. i might start a new thread for my build. now lets come back to the topic..

Last edited by inin36; Jan 2, 2019 at 05:28 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2018 | 07:38 PM
  #43  
inin36's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 79
Likes: 4
From: Singapore
ups
Reply
Old May 17, 2018 | 09:33 PM
  #44  
ExViTermini's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 13
From: Virginia
For the record the htuff 156mm do not clear the block with the 100mm crank. Clearancing like with ibeam's is required.
Reply
Old May 30, 2018 | 01:16 AM
  #45  
inin36's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 79
Likes: 4
From: Singapore
Originally Posted by ExViTermini
For the record the htuff 156mm do not clear the block with the 100mm crank. Clearancing like with ibeam's is required.
correct.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:51 AM.