months and months of secrecy,for what!!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Fireball
Go away troll... numbers are just that... numbers. I can say I have a top fuel dragster that has electronic this, electronic that and 6000 hp, but how well will it do on the track?
Go away troll... numbers are just that... numbers. I can say I have a top fuel dragster that has electronic this, electronic that and 6000 hp, but how well will it do on the track?
Adding to that, we dont even have all the relevant numbers such as rpms at which this or that torque is obtained, how long it stays at that value for, the gear ratios, the weight, the aerodynamics, lateral G, etc., etc.
If DCCD is like ACD, then won't that really matter in a street or road course environment? Isn't ACD just being able to select the tranny workings for what type of surface you're on? How many times do you think you'll need to switch the type of surface you're on while you're racing?
You're definetely right about that, it really doesn't make too much sense to have ACD if all your driving will be on-road. Im not sure exactly how the Subaru system works, but I know for sure that with any car that's costing me 30k will never see any dirt or gravel action. Imagine all that paint chipping.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Between the Blue and the Sand
While we are on the subject of the viability of performance numbers on paper, I would suggest you all go to the book store and get this weeks copy of Motor Trend....if you haven't already. Since it's the one with the 2 page Evo VIII article.
There is an article in there that explains how accurate magazine reported performance numbers are. For instance, they explain that the 0-60 times in magazines have a margain of error of about 2-3tenths. That means they could test a car one day and get 4.5 0-60 times, and test another car at a later date and get 4.9 0-60 times. IT all has to do with the person driving the car, operating tolerances for each specific car, and the environment.
So when we see that the Sti will do 0-60 in 4.5 secs, we really have no reason to whine when the Evo 'only' does it in 4.7. Because those 2 numbers are well outside what is statistically significant.
SC~ who knows his Evo is going to rawk.
There is an article in there that explains how accurate magazine reported performance numbers are. For instance, they explain that the 0-60 times in magazines have a margain of error of about 2-3tenths. That means they could test a car one day and get 4.5 0-60 times, and test another car at a later date and get 4.9 0-60 times. IT all has to do with the person driving the car, operating tolerances for each specific car, and the environment.
So when we see that the Sti will do 0-60 in 4.5 secs, we really have no reason to whine when the Evo 'only' does it in 4.7. Because those 2 numbers are well outside what is statistically significant.
SC~ who knows his Evo is going to rawk.
ACD is really important. I'm sure when the computer deliver the power to the front or rear wheel at incredible speed will really affect handling.
I'm sure they will test JDM vs. U.S spec on the road course. I'm curious how much slower the U.S. version will achieve.
I'm sure they will test JDM vs. U.S spec on the road course. I'm curious how much slower the U.S. version will achieve.
Does ACD really change things while you drive? I thought that was AYC. I thought ACD is only a selector, persay, to choose what you want to do w/ the center diff, but it doesn't change anything while you actually drive.
Originally posted by Fireball
Does ACD really change things while you drive? I thought that was AYC. I thought ACD is only a selector, persay, to choose what you want to do w/ the center diff, but it doesn't change anything while you actually drive.
Does ACD really change things while you drive? I thought that was AYC. I thought ACD is only a selector, persay, to choose what you want to do w/ the center diff, but it doesn't change anything while you actually drive.
Lastly, the way the AYC works in the stock trim, is to control how much of that rotation is tolerable and cuts the effect once you go over from what they set to be the border in their ECU code. Simple switch to the different code (like the K2 tarmac unit) would make the whole thing much better!
Fedja
I hear ya im pushing it at $30,000. also
I would sure like to hear some of these "kids" in here that are talking trash , that a car with 30 more hp/tq. will eat up the evo!!!!!!
what a joke........are any of you SERIOUSLY buying one when they get here?
and dont say no i will wait for the sti..........
Its time to come out of Fantasy Land.
I would sure like to hear some of these "kids" in here that are talking trash , that a car with 30 more hp/tq. will eat up the evo!!!!!!
what a joke........are any of you SERIOUSLY buying one when they get here?
and dont say no i will wait for the sti..........
Its time to come out of Fantasy Land.






