Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

¼ mile test runs at LACR - link enclosed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 02:23 PM
  #1  
Scot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
From: SS
¼ mile test runs at LACR - link enclosed

http://www.s2ki.com/forums/showthrea...hreadid=101463

at least 2 different guys saw it run 13.8 at what is apparently a ****ty track. That is good news.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 02:32 PM
  #2  
trigeek37's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis
yeah, unless everyone that runs there is an idiot
I thought 13.8 seemed sorta pokey...
will be nice to get some proper tests done on the Evo... I have to think we should see some comprehensive write-ups on it pretty damn quick, as I imagine MMC is giving accsss to R&T, SCC, C&D, etc - it certainly is in their best interest to do so... free advertising, and probably cover shots.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 02:34 PM
  #3  
suave3747's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
those posts are extremely encouraging

with these guys saying that it outperformed a 911 turbo in the quarter, and that it should be low 13s on a good strip, coupled with the fact that someone posted dyno results for an evo 8 yesterday of 230 which translates to over 300 hp if you use the same drivetrain loss that the 7 had, the evo might be even more beastly than we thought

top notch
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 02:37 PM
  #4  
trigeek37's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis
they didn't say 911 turbo - 300 hp is the "standard" 911 c2 or c4 - which is up to 320 this year. don't be surprised if the Evo8 is just as fast as the non-turbo 996 911...
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #5  
MrAWD's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 22
From: Reading, MA
Nice!!

Averaging 99 mph and 13.8 is pretty good! Assuming the weight is about 3450, that would bring it to about 260 HP at the wheels!! Used Horsepower Calculator from the DSM Club.


Very nice!!!

Fedja
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #6  
suave3747's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
oops. i stand corrected.

nevertheless, eating a 911's cookies would be a great way to start or end a day.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 02:46 PM
  #7  
Secret Chimp's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Between the Blue and the Sand
Great find Megabusa! Thanks...this is encouraging....

SC
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 02:48 PM
  #8  
trigeek37's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis
Originally posted by suave3747
oops. i stand corrected.

nevertheless, eating a 911's cookies would be a great way to start or end a day.
damn straight!
now if only it looked like a Porshe...
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 02:57 PM
  #9  
jedinite's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, MO
Just confirms what I've been expecting.

Out of the box, performance wise, should be on par with the BMW (e46) M3 and the Porsche 911 Carerra. low 13's in the quarter mile (13.3 for the M3). Hopefully sub-five second 0-60 (the M3 is 4.6).

Great find... thanks for posting.

Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 03:07 PM
  #10  
broeli's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,803
Likes: 0
Ok. LACR from what I found is 2710ft above sea level. With it corrected to "at sea level" times, it would be:
13.35 @ 102.33mph.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 03:16 PM
  #11  
uranium9v's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: Somerset, KY
Does anyone else feel like we are fudging the numbers to make them sould better?? Let's just wait until we see a run on a reputable track from a reputable source.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 03:18 PM
  #12  
elusive's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: 818 cali
EDIT: nvm, i didn't read the post right.

Last edited by elusive; Jan 24, 2003 at 03:30 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 03:26 PM
  #13  
Secret Chimp's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Between the Blue and the Sand
Originally posted by elusive
the guy already corrected the time to sea level. he said it ran a 14.3 at LACR, 13.8 at sea level.
wrong....when he was watching the Evo pulled a 14.2....but he said it ran a straight 13.8 on a run when he was NOT watching.

SC
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 03:29 PM
  #14  
broeli's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,803
Likes: 0
No, he didn't correct it! You need to read it right. He said HE SAW it run a 14.3 but that it actually ran a 13.8 that night (best run). Here is his direct wording: "Anyway they said it ran a 13.8 which means its a low 13 second card at a normal drag strip"
Once again, my corrected times stand.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 03:34 PM
  #15  
EVOwhat's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: boonies
i'm sorry but corrected times are gay.

Ryan
"run what you brung"
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:16 PM.