Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Road & Track EVO 8 test numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 3, 2003, 03:04 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
dazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Road & Track EVO 8 test numbers

Article from R&T magazine of the new USDM Evo 8:

0-60: 5.1 secs (6000 rpm clutch drop mind you)
1/4 mile: 13.8@101.5mph
Top speed: 155
skidpad: 0.97g
slalom: 68.7mph
curb weight: 3265lbs


1/4 mile times & MPH are consistent with power to weight ratio listed by !
I except improve E.T's with a better skilled driver.
Old Feb 3, 2003, 03:12 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
diablo2184's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not bad but 1/4 mile and 0-60 could be better
Old Feb 3, 2003, 03:19 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
smanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slalom and Skidpad are very impressive
Old Feb 3, 2003, 03:22 PM
  #4  
gtr
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
gtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Which issue is that? Was there a braking 70-0 or 60-0 test?

I was hoping 102mph but 101.5mph is close enought. With that kind of trap speed it's well capable of 13.5 range. Must of been the driver or conditions that day. We'll see what Sport Compact Car has done? I'm sure they are more experienced in launching an AWD cars.

I've actually expected lower skidpad and higher salom.

I also want to mention that i've took a wrx at the drag strip and seen 13.9@96mph so go figure?
Old Feb 3, 2003, 03:23 PM
  #5  
Evolving Member
 
skibum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Western NY
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which R&T is that in?
Where was the test?
What elevation?
What temp.?
Barametric pressure?
Thanks

Last edited by skibum; Feb 3, 2003 at 03:26 PM.
Old Feb 3, 2003, 03:27 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
bobaab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Park Ridge, IL
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea, I Just got the March issue of Automobile it has an article about the Evo too. sounds liek the people at Automobile really enjoyed the car..raving about it's handling and speed. my favorite quote:
"The cognoscenti will know this car when they see it, but valet parkers will think you're part of the import-tuner scene."

now all i need to read is the STi article which should be coming out next month..probably.
-Bob
Old Feb 3, 2003, 03:31 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
bobaab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Park Ridge, IL
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
US Evo article in R&T and Automobile

Yep, i just got the March issue of Automobile and it has a rave review of the Evo I said this in another thread, but the people who tested the car sounded like they really enjoyed driving it. They talked about how the car handles really nice and the speed was incredible, but u all should know that by now
Best Quote:
"The cognoscenti will know this car when they see it, but valet parkers will think you're part of the import-tuner scene."
gotta love that
-Bob
Old Feb 3, 2003, 03:49 PM
  #8  
Evolving Member
 
Turboniam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by gtr
Which issue is that? Was there a braking 70-0 or 60-0 test?
The most current i.e. the one I got in the mail today!

I was hoping 102mph but 101.5mph is close enought. With that kind of trap speed it's well capable of 13.5 range. Must of been the driver or conditions that day. We'll see what Sport Compact Car has done? I'm sure they are more experienced in launching an AWD cars.
That was exactly what I was thinking!!

I also want to mention that i've took a wrx at the drag strip and seen 13.9@96mph so go figure?
I have seen LOTS of DSMs run 13.9 @ with a 96 mph trap speed... from what I would like to infer, would be that the 13.8 @ 101.5 is a crappy ET from someone who didn't know how to launch the car and was getting bad 60fts (2.0 or slower).

If you could cut a 1.7 or 1.8 60ft with a 101.5 trap speed a mid 13 would be a conservitive estimate.

I know people that have run 12.8s with a 104 trap speed with full weight DSMs... it is all about the 60ft! So if you subtract 2 mph from that run, you would end up around a low low 13 second ET. (gotta love the Ricer Math/Bench Racing ... even though it is based on real world info)
Old Feb 3, 2003, 04:00 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
 
Turboniam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Last edited by Turboniam; Feb 4, 2003 at 02:57 AM.
Old Feb 3, 2003, 04:03 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
bobaab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Park Ridge, IL
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im just informing people
-Bob
Old Feb 3, 2003, 04:20 PM
  #11  
gtr
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
gtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I feel magazine people should post 60ft time to let us know what kind of track conditions they are running. Oh well. I guess i'll check my mail today and hopefull i'll get read the article.

Any new pics guys?
Old Feb 3, 2003, 04:20 PM
  #12  
Evolving Member
 
WRX1832's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Medway, Ma
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 101.5mph trap speed is encouraging considering I ran a 13.25 at 100.56 in my WRX. That makes me very happy!

Mike
Old Feb 3, 2003, 04:23 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
broeli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe that was the run at LACR. Remember it ran a 13.8...but LACR has a crappy surface and is 2700 ft above sea level.
Old Feb 3, 2003, 04:27 PM
  #14  
gtr
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
gtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by broeli
Maybe that was the run at LACR. Remember it ran a 13.8...but LACR has a crappy surface and is 2700 ft above sea level.
Good point! The traction is definitly bad. I've seen people run 13.9@101mph in a 98 mustang cobra and it's hard to believe the cobra would run close times with an awd car. MPH is way up for 13.8 in an AWD car.
Old Feb 3, 2003, 04:28 PM
  #15  
Evolving Member
 
Turboniam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by gtr
I feel magazine people should post 60ft time to let us know what kind of track conditions they are running.
Exactly... I find myself always looking for 60ft times for some reason??

Any new pics guys?
Not really... nothing you haven't seen already!


Quick Reply: Road & Track EVO 8 test numbers



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:33 PM.