Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

05's > 03's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 01:04 PM
  #31  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by EVOtagger
nope both tuned XEDE's by shiv...same day same dyno
Can't argue with that...best way to compare is what you described, unless Shiv hasn't figured out how to efficiently tune 05s. I highly doubt you could put my mods on an 03 and tune it to a 12.2@111 with an S-AFC, though, but I could be wrong.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 01:05 PM
  #32  
EVOtagger's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
i doubt that too...but maybe my car is just a beast
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 01:09 PM
  #33  
4-BNGR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by BigLEVO
maybe you cant drive? lol jk...hmmm thats interesting, didnt know 05s were that much faster.
Umm, they're not
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 01:11 PM
  #34  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by 4-BNGR
Umm, they're not
They aren't? 12.9-13.1@104-105 seems a lot faster than 13.3-13.5@101-103 in stock form, and then with minimal mods, the gap is even wider. See below or check the drag racing forum.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 01:12 PM
  #35  
PVD04's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
In my '03 I trapped 104.96 with cat back, K&N, boost controller, and S-AFC on 93 octane. This was without a launch and I may have trapped slightly faster had I launched the car. At the time I could not afford a new clutch and figured I shouldn't be tempting fate by launching. I see that with similar mods on 99 octane Warrtalon trapped 109.19. My tune at the time was A/F ratios at ~11.0:1 and boost at 19.5 psi.

-Paul
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 01:16 PM
  #36  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by PVD04
In my '03 I trapped 104.96 with cat back, K&N, boost controller, and S-AFC on 93 octane. This was without a launch and I may have trapped slightly faster had I launched the car. At the time I could not afford a new clutch and figured I shouldn't be tempting fate by launching. I see that with similar mods on 99 octane Warrtalon trapped 109.19. My tune at the time was A/F ratios at ~11.0:1 and boost at 19.5 psi.
Actually, I was doing right under 111, but since I was hitting the rev limiter in 4th (slowing me down at the end), I had to come up with a new method of letting off the gas a little at 7500rpm and holding it there through the traps. This made my mph artificially low at 109, since I stopped accelerating and actually had to try and hold it there for the last half second, but it increased my time by 1/10th of a second. My 2 best mph's were 110.71 and 110.62, both of which were after bouncing off the rev limiter 4-5 times before hitting the finish line.

Oh, and btw, I _was_ launching hard and was rewarded with a bad clutch, so I think you did the right thing by not "tempting fate." On the bright side, I'll have a _real_ clutch (ACT) in there in a few days, so I'll be able to really drive the car now.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 01:18 PM
  #37  
invazn's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Ak
****the 05's going all out on my 03...haha
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 01:27 PM
  #38  
blackevoVII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
From: Denville, NJ
Originally Posted by delliott00
I have both an '03 and an '05. Stock vs. Stock the 05 is definitely torquier. Its noticeably faster, but not a huge amount. But the 05 responded much more to a reflash (both by /Al). With similar mods, the 05 is now much faster. Some of the dyno plots from Al on a MR with just a flash and MBC are awesome, I think there were some around 295whp with just a flash/mbc.

The 05 has a smoother shifter, for sure. But its not as tight or mechanical as the 03. I think its a wash, but its true the 05 is easier to shift for someone who isn't familiar with the car.

ACD works, its changes the character of the car. I find myself clicking it to tarmac for tight corners and clicking back to gravel or snow for long high-speed sweepers. You don't want oversteer in a 90mph sweeper.

But, does anyone know if the spring rates have changed? My 05 is softer than my wifes 03 for sure. Thats my only complaint vs the 03.

-Dave
'05 Elise
'05 Evo
'03 Evo
Yea well id hope so with the MR having higher boost and the hotside and a better tune. Put a hotside in the 03s and there's 70% of your HP difference.

Last edited by blackevoVII; Jun 21, 2005 at 01:31 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 02:05 PM
  #39  
4-BNGR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
They aren't? 12.9-13.1@104-105 seems a lot faster than 13.3-13.5@101-103 in stock form, and then with minimal mods, the gap is even wider. See below or check the drag racing forum.
My '03's far from stock
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 02:28 PM
  #40  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by 4-BNGR
My '03's far from stock
But that's what you refuted...a stock 05 not being so much faster than a stock 03.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 02:28 PM
  #41  
anjapower's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 1
From: Dirty Jersey
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
How do you own a brand new Evo at the age of 19 if you can't even form complete sentences with even the equivalent of 3rd-grade spelling? I know I'm a known "hater" when it comes to kids owning Evos, but this is just ridiculous. Asking about a "2.3 stocker" when you have a 2-week old 05 Evo and no discernable education is mind-boggling.
two words: rich parents
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 02:33 PM
  #42  
evo81's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,018
Likes: 0
all you have to do to a 03/04 is put is a 300 dollar 10.5 hotside.there is nothing better.the cars are all the same.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 02:52 PM
  #43  
4-BNGR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
But that's what you refuted...a stock 05 not being so much faster than a stock 03.
Never said anything about stock for stock and even so that's racing on "paper" not on the street...
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 03:03 PM
  #44  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by 4-BNGR
Never said anything about stock for stock and even so that's racing on "paper" not on the street...
Yes, but once again, you refuted the original claim, which was talking about how 05s are stronger in stock form.

It is _not_ paper racing, because I personally ran 13.1@104 on my _first_ try EVER with my MR, and that was with a bad 60'. You don't see anyone here running that with a stock 03 or 04. Better drivers have gotten 12.9s and 13.0s @ 105, which again is quite a difference from the 03/04 times you see, where the best are usually a 13.3 with only 102mph or so. This shows that the 05s definitely are faster...
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2005 | 03:20 PM
  #45  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Oh, and btw, I _was_ launching hard and was rewarded with a bad clutch, so I think you did the right thing by not "tempting fate." On the bright side, I'll have a _real_ clutch (ACT) in there in a few days, so I'll be able to really drive the car now.
That's why I am having an ACT put on. My MR clutch is perfect, but with the bunny turbo on 100 octane, I know it wouldn't last too long.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:36 AM.