EMS or Cams and Injectors
#1
EMS or Cams and Injectors
I've been asking around to find what would be best for pure power gains and i have conflicted opinions and was looking to you people for a wider span of opinions. As of now i have a jic catback, hks bov, aem intake and was wondering which would be better for my car at the moment. option 1- hks cams, most likely 264's, hks cam gears, new head stud's valve springs etc.. and walboro fuel pump and 720cc injectors option 2- AEM EMS with some sort of EBC. any opinions appreciated, the more the merrier thanks
#2
If you plan on going the AEM route eventually anyway, I would suggest going ahead and doing that. Cams would likely give you more power, but cams can be outgrown and may later need to be upgraded. You will never outgrow the EMS. Ever. With the EMS in place, you will be ready for absolutely anything you can wish to throw at the car. As long as you have a competent tuner, you will not be disappointed.
#3
Originally Posted by MaDeFoR5ZeRo5
I've been asking around to find what would be best for pure power gains and i have conflicted opinions and was looking to you people for a wider span of opinions. As of now i have a jic catback, hks bov, aem intake and was wondering which would be better for my car at the moment. option 1- hks cams, most likely 264's, hks cam gears, new head stud's valve springs etc.. and walboro fuel pump and 720cc injectors option 2- AEM EMS with some sort of EBC. any opinions appreciated, the more the merrier thanks
Most of the stuff that you want to install would not make you power at all, like these items:
720cc Injectors, Fuel pump,Cam gears,, head studs, valve springs
Here I copied and pasted my Evolution 8 evolution as far time track goes:
Mods: cone air filter, Works downpipe,Greddy Evo catback,Works 3"HF cat, car weighted 3226lb with just under half tank (without me)
30 JAN 2005
1) 13.80@103.62 3" tb,CAI
2) 13.730@101.76 3" tb,CAI
3) 13.704@102.29 3" tb,CAI
4) 13.661@104.68 3" tb,CAI
5) 13.591@102.48 3" tb,CAI
6) 13.423@103.61 3" tb,CAI
12 MARCH 05
13.8@103mph and rev limiter quicked in and missed 4th 3" tb,CAI
13.4@105 3" tb,CAI
13.3@105 3" tb,CAI
30 April note:
13.6@102 2.1 60 ft time 3" tb,CAI
13.6 @103 2.0 60' time 3" tb,CAI
(5k rpm rev limit disconnected) 13.4@104 1.9 60' time 3" tb,CAI
(5k rpm rev limiter disconnected) 13.2@104 1.9 60' time 3" tb,CAI
May 5th Remember I put HKS 264/264
1) 13.183@105.18 1.926 60' 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS
2) 13.084@104.97 1.884 60' 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS
3) 13.081@105.82 1.890 60' 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS
4) 12.991@107.07 1.894 60' 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS
5) 12.886@107.13 1.821 60' 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS
14 may 2005 Now car is custom tuned by Al(Dynoflash)
Note: car dropped 1 full second with the cams, dynoflash and rev limter switch disconnet
12.887@105.91 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
13.004@104.91 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
12.851@106.56 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
12.833@106.77 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
12.795@105.62 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
12.702@105.94 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
29 may 2005
12.661@105.80 60' 1.719 60' 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
30 may2005
12.684@106.10 60' 1.759 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
June 11th 2005
1st run(still on 91)
60' 1.808
1/8 mile 8.114@85.14
1/4 mile 12.731@106.96 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
2nd run (still 91oct)
60' 1.707
1/8 mile 7.959@84.73
1/4 mile 12.610@105.55 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
3rd run (still with 91 oct gas)
60' 1.808
1/8 mile 8.058 @85.70
1/4 mile 12.662@106.72 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
4th run (with the mix of 91 and 99oct)
60' 1.705
1/8 mile 7.928@85.82
1/4 mile 12.493@108.43
5th run (with 91&99oct) 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
60' 1.899
1/8 mile 8.214@85.80
1/4 mile 12.775@108.69 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
6th run (91&99oct)
60' 1.760
1/8 mile 7.962@@86.13
1/4 mile 12.483@109.29 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
7th run (91&99oct)
misssed third gear 3 times then shifted to 5th
still did a 14.4@104.06 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
8th run 91oct&99oct)
60' 1.790
1/8 mile 7.978@85.74
1/4 12.517@108.97 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
my other runs were:
12.824@106.98 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
13.020@107.41 missed gears 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
13.2@104 missed gears 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
12.673@107.71 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
12.721@107.51 3" tb,CAI,MBC,264/264 CAMS,Custom Dynoflash
I just ordered Lower and upper pipes and I have headers on hand (not installed yet)
#4
Originally Posted by MaDeFoR5ZeRo5
I've been asking around to find what would be best for pure power gains and i have conflicted opinions and was looking to you people for a wider span of opinions. As of now i have a jic catback, hks bov, aem intake and was wondering which would be better for my car at the moment. option 1- hks cams, most likely 264's, hks cam gears, new head stud's valve springs etc.. and walboro fuel pump and 720cc injectors option 2- AEM EMS with some sort of EBC. any opinions appreciated, the more the merrier thanks
Brent