Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Two little changes on the IX from the VIII

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 12:15 PM
  #46  
purecoda's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,674
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MD
Originally Posted by razorlab
03-05 evos have hollow cams and Mg Valve covers too. These aren't new to the IX. How do you people not know what your cars have? I don't understand.
cam? what's a cam?

/end the funny
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 12:16 PM
  #47  
Mark Sebby's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: San Marcos, Texas.
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
Yeah, Thanks Mark, but I don't think I'll be able to get a IX (from you or anyone). I will probably just wait for the X, hopefully it looks great. I think it will look good, I think it either look better then prototype pics or that style will grow on people because the car will be strait dope.
I heard some inside information (MITSU CORP) from a phone call I listened into! OOPS! ... that the EVO X will start somewhere in the neighborhood of $38k - $45k! Just what I heard not the gospel!

Let me know when you decide, I may be able to save you some money... or check out the vendor forums for auto dealers.. you have some guys advertising sick prices in your neighborhoods.



Best regards,
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 01:33 PM
  #48  
shivaswrath's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: Norwalk, CT
frankly, with the price of the V-8 M3 going up into the upper 60's, the M5 in the close to 100's, I'd be PERFECTLY content if the Evo X was 38-45k IF and ONLY if it came with the S-AYC like on the JDM spec. . .in addition to a high compression, direct fuel injection, 4 banger with MIVEC on intake/exhaust. . .****, I could probably selll my VIII for an awesome price when the X comes out because a bunch of ricers would NOT be willing to pay luxury car prices for an EVO. . . anxiously waiting, deliberately holding off on mods. . .
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 08:17 PM
  #49  
mr96gsx408's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by Jhero23
Bump for more info.
did you know the Rims on the middle model are different?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 08:27 PM
  #50  
b1keguy's Avatar
Newbie
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Rims are lighter, hood and trunk are made of aluminum
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 08:36 PM
  #51  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by b1keguy
Rims are lighter, hood and trunk are made of aluminum
Apparently, the trunk is not aluminum, but rather thin sheet metal.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 05:53 AM
  #52  
LA_Dodgers1's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, CA
Originally Posted by GPTourer
All '05's got the aluminum crash bars. No change to '06.
The '05 RS trunk is described as "thin body sheet metal" but not specifically aluminum in my product guide. No change to '06.
The '06 GSR Enkeis are supposed to weigh less then the '03-'05s but I don't know by how much.
I agree, the trunk is "thin body sheet metal" on my RS
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 06:08 AM
  #53  
Vroompsh's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
From: Rockville, MD
i'd say the mivec system has to way a few pounds extra alone, i mean there could be any number of minute details on the car, bodywork, etc that added to the gained weight.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 09:49 AM
  #54  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
The new only Enkies weight 5oz. less then the the VIII Enkies. 4x5oz=20oz=1.25 lbs.. It also say in the fine print don't compare to previous evolution generation.
I found this blurb on Mitsu's global site:

"GSR and GT trim levels run on Enkei 17x8JJ lightweight 5-double-spoke alloy road wheels that are 0.15 kg per wheel lighter than those fitted to Evolution VIII MR."

http://media.mitsubishi-motors.com/p...etail1228.html

So stock VIII wheels are the heaviest, followed by MR's, followed by stock IX's RS and GSR. It is odd that an upgrade for a IX MR would be to swap to IX GSR/RS wheels which actually weigh less. They aren't using MR BBS wheels anymore and no longer have a MR model.

The only claim a "longer diffuser" for the turbo, as opposed to the magnesium compressor wheels in the GT/RS turbo which I'm assuming we don't get. I doubt any significant weight changes are due to the turbo.

Last edited by GPTourer; Dec 22, 2005 at 09:54 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 09:57 AM
  #55  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by GPTourer
I found this blurb on Mitsu's global site:

"GSR and GT trim levels run on Enkei 17x8JJ lightweight 5-double-spoke alloy road wheels that are 0.15 kg per wheel lighter than those fitted to Evolution VIII MR."

http://media.mitsubishi-motors.com/p...etail1228.html

So stock VIII wheels are the heaviest, followed by MR's, followed by stock IX's RS and GSR. It is odd that an upgrade for a IX MR would be to swap to IX GSR/RS wheels which actually weigh less. They aren't using MR BBS wheels anymore and no longer have a MR model.
I'm still having trouble with this quote, because it doesn't seem to make sense. I think it was a mis-print and was supposd to say ".15kg per wheel lighter than those fitted to the Evolution VIII." I say this because of this listing:

Evo8 wheels = 20.50 lbs
Evo9 wheels = 20.17 lbs
MR wheels = 17.74 lbs

If you notice, the Evo9 wheels are .33lbs lighter than the Evo8 wheels, which is exactly .15kg. (2.2kg=1lb). It really would make no sense for the Evo9 wheels to be lighter than the lightweight, forged BBSs. What do you think?

Last edited by Warrtalon; Dec 22, 2005 at 10:14 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 10:03 AM
  #56  
housedj's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: in front of your car
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
I just got the brocheure for the IX and I notice two little things......

1. The EVO IX GSR(base) gained 11lbs. IX GSR - 3274 / VIII GSR - 3263

2. The boost changed a little. Exact boost - 20.16 @3500rpm (WOT)/16.10 @6500rpm (WOT)

Does anyone know why it gained 11lbs.????
the brochure has several inaccuracies in it & should not be taken as fact. it states that you can get an MR in blue (not true), the other colors are wrong. the stock boost (if your east of the Mississippi river) is pretty similar to the '05's. if you compare the "05 MR to the 9, the 9's did lose 11lbs. also you will notice that it says all 3 models are the same weight but the regular 9 doesn't have the Al roof. Strange?!!? point is, don't believe everything you read. if you want to know your car's weight, go out to a truck stop weigh station to weigh your car with YOU in it. it's like $8 i think...
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 10:04 AM
  #57  
ChopShop's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: Fort Hood
I think the IX wing only the blade is CF as on the VIII the whole wing is.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 10:11 AM
  #58  
Chamama's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 404
Likes: 1
From: Bangladesh
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
I'm still having trouble with this quote, because it doesn't seem to make sense. I think it was a mis-print and was supposd to say ".15kg per wheel lighter than those fitted to the Evolution VIII." I say this because of this listing:

Evo8 wheels = 20.50 lbs
Evo9 wheels = 20.17 lbs
MR wheels = 17.74 lbs

If you notice, the Evo9 wheels are .33lbs heavier than the Evo8 wheels, which is exactly .15kg. (2.2kg=1lb). It really would make no sense for the Evo9 wheels to be lighter than the lightweight, forged BBSs. What do you think?

I think you meant to say "lighter" and (1 kg=2.2 lb).

I also think that BBS forged wheels are lighter than the Evo 9 wheels. This is because when I ordered the JDM evo9 GSR, I had to take the BBS alloys as an option and pay extra. So, it shouldn't be heavier than the evo9 enkeis and still cost more.

Last edited by Chamama; Dec 22, 2005 at 10:22 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 10:13 AM
  #59  
mrcox's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Rockwall, TX
The Wing on the IX I also Hollow. The VIII is solid.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 10:15 AM
  #60  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by Chamama
I think you meant to say "lighter" and (1 kg=2.2 lb).

I also think that BBS forged wheels are lighter than the Evo 9 wheels. This is because when I ordered the JDM evo9 GSR, I had to take the BBS alloys as an option and pay extra. So, it shouldn't be heavier than the evo9 enkeis and still cost more.
Fixed, thanks.

Yes, they shouldn't cost more if they are heavier, but there's also more to the BBS rims than weight. Being forged means they are also much stronger. Usually, forged means stronger AND lighter, so I think the Mitsu site just has a misprint when stating the comparative wheel weights.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:47 AM.