Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Got Dyno'd! with dynosheet!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 05:58 PM
  #1  
PeteyTurbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 10
From: Philadelphia
Got Dyno'd! with dynosheet!

Got my MR on the dyno for the first time just to see where I was at and have a baseline to go from. I do not know correction factors ect. but I do know it is a corrected number on an all wheel dyno at Precision Dyno Tuning. I took my car there on saturday for the holiday dyno day and couldn't be happier. They are a great bunch of guys and would reccomend them to anyone.
I came out with 295WHP and 298TQ. I was not expecting such a high number to be honest. I have ran 12.6@108 with the same setup minus the cat back. After installing the cat back the car seems to have gotten more of a top end. My mod list is as follows.
1. Agency Power Cat Back
2. UR 2.5 inch test pipe
3. Dynoflash mail in
Thats all!
1st run


2nd run
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:06 PM
  #2  
Rnm's Avatar
Rnm
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Thats a beast!
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:08 PM
  #3  
yesevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
OMG THATS REALLY HOT..I MUST GET AN EVO9 MR....
I GOT 12.5 AND 110mph with my 03 evo with cam, methanol kit .running(25psi) and ported manifold o2 housing, and turbin housing.....etc...u name it i did it all except stock turbo....

this is amazing # on mustang dyno~!
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:09 PM
  #4  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
That's one high reading mustang dyno.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:09 PM
  #5  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Hey, Petey, those definitely are surprising numbers. I can't seem to reconcile them with these results, though:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...highlight=dyno

Sergio dyno'd just about the same at PD (305whp/296wtq), but trapped 114.8 on 93oct. What do you think?

Last edited by Warrtalon; Dec 19, 2005 at 06:13 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:10 PM
  #6  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by yesevo
OMG THATS REALLY HOT..I MUST GET AN EVO9 MR....
According to his profile he has a 05 MR.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:11 PM
  #7  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Hey, Petey, those definitely are surprising numbers. I can't seem to reconcile them with these results, though:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...highlight=dyno

Sergio dyno'd just about the same, but trapped 114.8 on 93oct.
Well he did say these are correct numbers...
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:16 PM
  #8  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by razorlab
Well he did say these are correct numbers...
Corrected numbers? Yes, maybe, but Sergio's were also SAE corrected. I listed the uncorrected numbers. Sergio's SAE corrected numbers were 300whp/290wtq. Still right in the same ballpark, which is strange for a 6-7mph difference in trap speed.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:19 PM
  #9  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Corrected numbers? Yes, maybe, but Sergio's were also SAE corrected. I listed the uncorrected numbers. Sergio's SAE corrected numbers were 300whp/290wtq. Still right in the same ballpark, which is strange for a 6-7mph difference in trap speed.
Well then maybe different temps? It does seem awfully high for a mustang and those mods, espically compared to Sergio's.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:27 PM
  #10  
IEXCELR8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
From: NJ
What are you guys talking about, his 108 trap was without the cat back.

"I have ran 12.6@108 with the same setup minus the cat back. After installing the cat back the car seems to have gotten more of a top end. "
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:33 PM
  #11  
RSGuy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
WOW! Congrats, those are insane numbers! You should be proud that you have a factory monstor
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:42 PM
  #12  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by IEXCELR8
What are you guys talking about, his 108 trap was without the cat back.

"I have ran 12.6@108 with the same setup minus the cat back. After installing the cat back the car seems to have gotten more of a top end. "
That's no more than 10-15whp. He already had a test pipe, which gives the biggest gain in the exhaust. He might trap 109-110 now, but not 114+.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:43 PM
  #13  
yesevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
how did u brake-in ur engine??? for the first 20miles? easy or hard?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:53 PM
  #14  
el producto's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: MA
noob question...

are dyno pulls always done in 3rd gear or does it vary. I know they can't do 1st and 2nd gear pulls due to slippage, j/w if its only 3rd?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:55 PM
  #15  
IEXCELR8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
That's no more than 10-15whp. He already had a test pipe, which gives the biggest gain in the exhaust. He might trap 109-110 now, but not 114+.

You may be right. He may not have had the TP on either.We will see when hits the track.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:19 AM.