Engine mount vs Torque Damper
Originally Posted by chrisw
seeing as how I already broke my cheap **** weapon-R/ingalls/stiffy engine dampener, I think the motor mounts are a better solution.
much harder to install however....
much harder to install however....
Matt J.
Originally Posted by dsldsl25
Is there really any downside to upgrading the engine mounts? I read that it makes the car shake a little more.. Any thoughts?
Don
Don
The car doesn't 'shake' per-say, but vibrations are increased.
i cant tell any added vibration with my front mount. I had the Ingall dampner and it induced added vibration and whine on the weak setting even. The mount seems to have a better feel to me than the dampner. Like buschur said a engine dampner does not limit the movement it just slows it down.
this one should have been answered a lot easier. The need for the ingalls stiffy is because of the poor quality of the stock front motor mount. You do not band-aid something to fix it, you find the original problem. Then front motor mounts are generally cheaper, and should not be all that difficult to install, if u have a general idea of what you're doing!
Originally Posted by chrisw
seeing as how I already broke my cheap **** weapon-R/ingalls/stiffy engine dampener, I think the motor mounts are a better solution.
much harder to install however....
much harder to install however....
Originally Posted by Mayhew333
Which one is better and why.
The Front engine mount is soo much cheaper but how hard is it to install?
I like the Idea of adjustability and the "bling factor" of the Damper but I also like the Idea of paying 40 bucks for a front mount.
The Front engine mount is soo much cheaper but how hard is it to install?
I like the Idea of adjustability and the "bling factor" of the Damper but I also like the Idea of paying 40 bucks for a front mount.

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sheasta
For Sale - Wanting To Buy (WTB) Or Trade (WTT)
3
Feb 20, 2014 07:23 AM
SLO-EVO
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
37
Mar 4, 2009 04:40 AM




