I ripped this from fifth gear,its old but i thought not everyone has seen it.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...39026326988259

 

I think the girly needs to be just a tad smoother around the track....looked like a squirrel was driving

 

nice find! does anyone else find her hot when she is driving!

 

old vid, they really didnt give the evo a chance if its the same one i seen. the noble beats it and they just start ridiculing the evo.

 

thats ladys ugly first of all.... 2nd. she said that u have to mad handle the evo around turns?! thats lame if she doesnt know how to actually use that HKS turbo the FQ-400 has.... she shouldnt be comparing the cars in the first place!

 

she said its hard to keep the evo in the powerband.....i never have problems with that

 

You have to remember: EVO=Japan Noble=England
They are just doing a commercial for Noble!

One other thing, on the other show "Top Gear" wasn't the FQ-400 listed higher on the lap board? I'll have to check it out to be sure.

 

Okay, she wasn't hot ever at any point.

 

Turbo = Owen racing Development...

 

16 - Evo FQ 400 - 1.24.8
17 - Noble - 1.25.0

http://www.topgear.com/content/tgonb...times/thestig/

that's mightly close if you ask me.

 

Thats the stupidest thing I have read on this thread.... the faster the car the faster the rating, as you said around the test track the mr fq 400 was faster than everything sans slr, koenigsegg, enzo and a couple others.

Scorke

 

Yep......it all about the driver

 

Thanks! I knew if was faster I just had to look it up! Glad someone posted the times!

 

16 - Evo FQ 400 - 1.24.8
17 - Noble - 1.25.0

Was that even a Noble M400 to begin with? There are also countless other variables in laptimes - for example weather and track conditions. And yes, FQ400 should be a lot laggier than a standard evo as reviewed in Top Gear.

 

actually its a Custom built Garrett GT Dual Ball bearing Turbocharger