The fast and furious 3 EVO in SCC Magazine
Originally Posted by iLLiVo
how retarded...
after all, all of the sounds from the eclipse in the first f&f movie came from some guys turbo crx...they recorded multiple sound clips and put it in with the eclipse...
how sad
after all, all of the sounds from the eclipse in the first f&f movie came from some guys turbo crx...they recorded multiple sound clips and put it in with the eclipse...
how sad
Originally Posted by mtags24
Let's not forget who the expected audience is for this movie. If the viewers were interested in the cars' specs they would be watching something else. This movie is for kids, and kids who wish they had cars like that. It's not for anyone who knows their way around a car, to a certain extent.
I might go for a laugh. How can everyone get mad at them for riced out cars or terrible drivers? Thats all they need to make money. shame about the abuse though
I might go for a laugh. How can everyone get mad at them for riced out cars or terrible drivers? Thats all they need to make money. shame about the abuse though
if they're such terrible drivers i wonder how they do all those crazy drift scenes...
you guys are all really being stupid about this. it's a movie... and for what it's worth, there's some really freakin' crazy car action... and yeah, it's got a hollywood twist. yeah, someone will prolly yell nawwwwws. but who cares.... it's doin' its job...
Originally Posted by J8dailo
i just picked up the Sport Compact Cars magazine and it has on the cover..the RWD widebody evo.. i thought it ws a sweet car until i read the specs... it saids that they ran the evo and estim 1/4 mile is 15.3 ..evo is the slowest car out of the 5 cars they tested from the fast and furious 3... the fastest 1/4 mile car being the S2000 running 13.9.. is this bullsh1t or what..
For those who care, the rwd Evo ran a mid 14. The interesting point I took from the article is RMR actually makes a kit now to convert your Evo to RWD (not that it would be hard to figure out yourself), that and the fact they made the donated Evo IXs look like VIIIs for some reason.
that is shocking. but then again as the dofus about is right it is a movie car they dont need it completely fast. but hell even at stock motor levels they should still run a better time then that.
Originally Posted by Blitzbaster02
So what the hell is the point of testing these cars in a magazine if they are slower than stock cars.
Originally Posted by Blitzbaster02
so does running an airplane into a skyscraper...... doesnt makes it a good idea
Originally Posted by Tristar Racing
that and the fact they made the donated Evo IXs look like VIIIs for some reason.
Evos do so well stock, they don't have to be modded. They are also new, so you don't have to go and dig up a bunch of used examples and fix them up to look decent on camera, like Supras and FDs. With Supras, most of them were just N/A's Maaco'd orange, with only one or two well sorted cars that need to look good up close. So that's why those cars (and the Skyline) actually perform decent compared to a stock Evo that's been beat on.
Last edited by GPTourer; May 24, 2006 at 01:05 PM.
Well i havent seen lots of info on this car, or this magazine yet.... but with a rollcage(if it has one) and other items like that that weight wouldnt be that far off. I am saying that the times arent that far fetched (even though very poor) considering that there is alot more to 1/4 times then just the hp/weight ratio, like track conditions or humidity.
Last edited by PhoenixEvo; May 24, 2006 at 01:36 PM.
Originally Posted by trinydex
are you sure? we took over iraq...
Last edited by PhoenixEvo; May 24, 2006 at 02:19 PM.



