boost ?
Evolved Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
From: City O Sin, MA...the not so sinish part though...
Originally Posted by srt2evo9
i was askin of i should do a boost leak test or if its normal to taper that much before i do one
Evolved Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
From: City O Sin, MA...the not so sinish part though...
Originally Posted by PessimiStick
I was just bein a dick. =p
Your explanation is fine though, I have _PessimiStick on a different forum for similar reasons.
Your explanation is fine though, I have _PessimiStick on a different forum for similar reasons.
Yes, IXs taper more than VIIIs due to the MIVEC pushing more through the head than the turbo can keep up with. You still make lots more power than an VIII maintaining 19psi - people spend WAY too much time worrying about "boost taper" and too little time worrying about how the car actually performs (i.e. track and dyno).
People claim that all the time. If they show you MAP sensor logs of their IXs with 20psi at 7000rpm, then you can believe it. If and when that happens, please post them here for me to see...
if it performed poorly at the track, then log it next time to see what your AFRs and timing are doing all the way through 4th.
if it performed poorly at the track, then log it next time to see what your AFRs and timing are doing all the way through 4th.
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Yes, IXs taper more than VIIIs due to the MIVEC pushing more through the head than the turbo can keep up with. You still make lots more power than an VIII maintaining 19psi - people spend WAY too much time worrying about "boost taper" and too little time worrying about how the car actually performs (i.e. track and dyno).
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
People claim that all the time. If they show you MAP sensor logs of their IXs with 20psi at 7000rpm, then you can believe it. If and when that happens, please post them here for me to see...
if it performed poorly at the track, then log it next time to see what your AFRs and timing are doing all the way through 4th.
if it performed poorly at the track, then log it next time to see what your AFRs and timing are doing all the way through 4th.
I didn't say it would be the tune - that's another thing that people automatically assume. Just because the car may be running poorly, it doesn't mean it's because of the tune. Tracking the AFRs and timing is not for determining the quality of the tune - it's for finding symptoms of why you're not running as well as YOU expect (if that's the case). It may end up pointing to the tune, but don't assume that up front.
well if there are 0 boost leaks the boost was the same as when tuned with the same gas(i only use one station) why would the A/f's timing/ knock be out of whack other then a tune?? Not bein a Dick Just honestly wondering...






