evo 9 turbo on evo 8?? need info
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: this old house
evo 9 turbo on evo 8?? need info
ok i cant find real hard data or maby i just did not seach long enough
but how does the evo 9 turbo hold boost uptop compared to the 05evo8 turbo.
like im boosting 23pis then i taper to 20psi by redline.
how is the 9 turbo on the evo8 uptop in that matter.
i would like to know how the 9 turbo taper's on the evo 8. more or less then the evo 8 turbo
and how is spoolup with the 9 turbo on the evo8 compared.
what kind of number's are people showing just from the change. i see average is about 20whp just bolting the evo 9 turbo on the evo 8. any more info would be great. thanks guys.
but how does the evo 9 turbo hold boost uptop compared to the 05evo8 turbo.
like im boosting 23pis then i taper to 20psi by redline.
how is the 9 turbo on the evo8 uptop in that matter.
i would like to know how the 9 turbo taper's on the evo 8. more or less then the evo 8 turbo
and how is spoolup with the 9 turbo on the evo8 compared.
what kind of number's are people showing just from the change. i see average is about 20whp just bolting the evo 9 turbo on the evo 8. any more info would be great. thanks guys.
Last edited by evilevo2006; Jan 6, 2007 at 06:27 PM.
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: this old house
From my personal experience, having swapped an OEM 16G IX into my '05 VIII, you have everything to gain and nothing to lose. Spool characteristics are the same but low end torque and peak power are increased. Untuned (well the car was tuned for about 21lbs of boost with the old OEM 16G VIII) I picked up gobs of torque and about 10whp on a very stingy Mustang dyno. When all was said and done and the car was tuned for the new snail we were making more power EVERYWHERE and significantly more torque down low. I've said it before and I'll say it again. Mitsu can't seem to support a WRC team, honor a warranty or sell their SUV's but their turbos are second to none. Their R&D is amazing and to have made such a significant improvement from one model year to the next on their OEM 16G is impressive.
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: this old house
From my personal experience, having swapped an OEM 16G IX into my '05 VIII, you have everything to gain and nothing to lose. Spool characteristics are the same but low end torque and peak power are increased. Untuned (well the car was tuned for about 21lbs of boost with the old OEM 16G VIII) I picked up gobs of torque and about 10whp on a very stingy Mustang dyno. When all was said and done and the car was tuned for the new snail we were making more power EVERYWHERE and significantly more torque down low. I've said it before and I'll say it again. Mitsu can't seem to support a WRC team, honor a warranty or sell their SUV's but their turbos are second to none. Their R&D is amazing and to have made such a significant improvement from one model year to the next on their OEM 16G is impressive.
I wish I still had the graphs to compare. All I have is the 16G IX "after" graph...
http://www.norcalevo.net/forum/index...html#msg184615
Notice the curve. I saw no difference in taper between the two turbos. Both pulled hard to redline with my setup but the 16G IX pulls much harder down low. I've done all the supporting mods as well though so results will vary depending on how far along the mod path you've taken the car.
If street racing posts were allowed I'd tell you what I did to my buddy's modded E46 M3, with the VIII turbo and then with the IX turbo, but I cannot. PM me for that info. It made for an interesting comparison.
This thread will give you a frame of refernce on the dyno chart I posted. The EIP Mustang dyno that chart came from is extremely conservative so before folks freak out and think my car's a dud check out what other Evos are doing...
http://www.norcalevo.net/forum/index...html#msg182986
http://www.norcalevo.net/forum/index...html#msg184615
Notice the curve. I saw no difference in taper between the two turbos. Both pulled hard to redline with my setup but the 16G IX pulls much harder down low. I've done all the supporting mods as well though so results will vary depending on how far along the mod path you've taken the car.
If street racing posts were allowed I'd tell you what I did to my buddy's modded E46 M3, with the VIII turbo and then with the IX turbo, but I cannot. PM me for that info. It made for an interesting comparison.
This thread will give you a frame of refernce on the dyno chart I posted. The EIP Mustang dyno that chart came from is extremely conservative so before folks freak out and think my car's a dud check out what other Evos are doing...
http://www.norcalevo.net/forum/index...html#msg182986
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 2
From: Spec-Ops Motorsports, Fayetteville, NC
the turbo is designed to taper because after you hit 6200 rpm's or so holding boost is pointless on the stock turbo because all you are do is throwing fuel into the system and the engine has topped off making horsepower and all you are doing is increasing heat
Trending Topics

Stage 2 Mitsubishi Evo 9 TME titainium-aluminide turbo & 20G upgrade new, with 10.5 Large Single Puck Turbine Housing. Rated for 450HP, plus it spools quicker!
http://www.lancershop.com/customer/p...&cat=17&page=1
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: this old house
TURDSQUIRTER - thanks for the info. i figured since this turbo is a tad bigger then the evo8 turbo it would hold boost a tad better uptop. but if it tapers as much as the normal evo8 turbo but makes better mid and low power then i guess its a good trad off for me who is not going BIG turbo. thanks guys for all your help. i hope this thread helps others in the future
TURDSQUIRTER - thanks for the info. i figured since this turbo is a tad bigger then the evo8 turbo it would hold boost a tad better uptop. but if it tapers as much as the normal evo8 turbo but makes better mid and low power then i guess its a good trad off for me who is not going BIG turbo. thanks guys for all your help. i hope this thread helps others in the future
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: this old house
Yeah I think you pretty much nailed it. The 16G IX is not a big numbers turbo, nor is any 16G on an Evo really. I think it's a great street turbo though with awesome autoX and road course potential. It's not a bad drag racing snail but it's definately not optimal for that application either if you're trying to crack into the 11's or 10's. It is however a 100% bolt-on affair with 100% OEM parts. Plug and play really. Until somebody creates an affordable 50 trim kit that retains an OEM-ish look, I think this is our best option on pump. Good luck with every thing dude.






