Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

HKS Camshaft selcetion/difference

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 05:11 AM
  #1  
Evo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
HKS Camshaft selcetion/difference

Hey guys,

Not a newbie, so I tried searching, but haven't found the specific answer yet.
I'm looking to buy some camshafts for my Evo, from the searching I see that HKS are most popular. What I don't understand is the difference between 264/272/280. I see that most also get 272/272 pair, but why. Evomoto says that it's set up between street and all performance. My question is what makes them "street" and "performance", what numbers they give out.

I know cat-delete is all performance/track, but some of us use it, right?

Thanks for all the help
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 08:23 AM
  #2  
Evo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Anyone?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 08:27 AM
  #3  
TxEvo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Try to search again, there is a ton of information on this site about this subject. Basically the difference is where you want the power band. 264s low end grunt/272 more mid-range power/280s more top end power.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 08:31 AM
  #4  
ROGERV's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: AZ
264 is more for low mid range power
272 is more for mid to top end
280 is more for top end on upgraded turbo
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 08:33 AM
  #5  
Stew's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: CT
The difference in the camshafts rating boils down to where they give you power. While the 264's will retain more TQ lower in your power band (Auto-x) the 280's will give you more grunt up top for drag, or highway applicatoins (if you're into that sort of thing). 272 will give you noticable HP up top, without sacraficing as much TQ as the 280's do.

For instance, I've had the pleasure of driving a friend's 03 a good amount and can give a good comparison to my 05. Both cars are running intake/TBE/flash, with the only difference being the 10.5 hotside on my car and the 2003 has HKS 272 camshafts. The 03 makes 335 HP and 300 TQ. My 2005 makes (or made) 300 HP, and 315 TQ. Where my 2005 was better around the Auto-x course with the stock cams (25_?) the 2003 would walk away under higher RPM's (5000+).

It all depends on what you want to do with the car. For just daily driving you would be fine with the low end that the 272's give you, but 264's would idle more smoothly and keep the TQ.

Cat-delete's are used by a LOT of people, and it's said that they are track/racing setups because it is not "legal" on the street. However, it is an easy mod to gain HP.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 08:37 AM
  #6  
Evo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Originally Posted by Stew
The difference in the camshafts rating boils down to where they give you power. While the 264's will retain more TQ lower in your power band (Auto-x) the 280's will give you more grunt up top for drag, or highway applicatoins (if you're into that sort of thing). 272 will give you noticable HP up top, without sacraficing as much TQ as the 280's do.

For instance, I've had the pleasure of driving a friend's 03 a good amount and can give a good comparison to my 05. Both cars are running intake/TBE/flash, with the only difference being the 10.5 hotside on my car and the 2003 has HKS 272 camshafts. The 03 makes 335 HP and 300 TQ. My 2005 makes (or made) 300 HP, and 315 TQ. Where my 2005 was better around the Auto-x course with the stock cams (25_?) the 2003 would walk away under higher RPM's (5000+).

It all depends on what you want to do with the car. For just daily driving you would be fine with the low end that the 272's give you, but 264's would idle more smoothly and keep the TQ.

Cat-delete's are used by a LOT of people, and it's said that they are track/racing setups because it is not "legal" on the street. However, it is an easy mod to gain HP.
Thanks so much, you answered my question.... . I'm more into HP(1/4), even though I'm planing on going to the track.. I guess 272 would be just a walk in between
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 08:42 AM
  #7  
Stew's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by Evolution[OH]
Thanks so much, you answered my question.... . I'm more into HP(1/4), even though I'm planing on going to the track.. I guess 272 would be just a walk in between
For the track (roadcourse/drag, not Auto-x) you will be fine with the 272's. If you were an Auto-x'er, I would say forget the cams and upgrade to a 10.5 hotside turbo.

For a weekend 1/4 mile racer, 272's will be great. People have issues with larger cams sometimes (idle, part throttle, etc) and that's not fun stuff if you want to drive the car daily.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 08:44 AM
  #8  
Evo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Originally Posted by Stew
For the track (roadcourse/drag, not Auto-x) you will be fine with the 272's. If you were an Auto-x'er, I would say forget the cams and upgrade to a 10.5 hotside turbo.
Not there yet. Never tried Auto x, planing though this year. Never been to the track either, so I have big plans for this spring, but don't know if I'm going to like it or not
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 08:45 AM
  #9  
Evo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
What I'm trying to say is I love the track idea, but never got to it.....
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 08:51 AM
  #10  
Stew's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: CT
In that case I would suggest racing the car before you put too much money into mods. The issue is that building a car (even a little bit) for drag and for Auto-x are two completely different directions. If you install cams now, go to the drag strip, hate it, then go to the Auto-x and love it, you'll want to rip out your cams. Although you'd have fun with the car in whatever racing you decide to do, if you want to be competitive you'll need a solid modification plan which can only come from actually bringing the car to the track (or Auto-x).

Save the $ on cams now and buy a used 2005+ turbo (w/10.5 hotside) for $400-500, then decide which type of racing you like best
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 08:53 AM
  #11  
Evo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Thanks
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jansoft_16
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
1
Sep 23, 2013 08:07 PM
David Buschur
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
18
Mar 17, 2012 10:32 PM
blkmkIII
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
5
Oct 9, 2009 08:14 AM
thientran
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
14
Jun 5, 2009 11:04 PM
mick82907
Evo General
39
Feb 12, 2008 03:05 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:14 PM.