Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

NewMods and Tune gets me a 12.5 @ track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 10:06 AM
  #46  
Q@EvoPowerMods's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: In the Shop in Alabama
I say we go back to Steele next friday night. When they close down we go back into town for the DJ a thon down at the Station. I saw a flyer showing all the different DJ's that will be spining the music. Should be fun...Racing and Dancing. Let's get Trae to go too.
Ill try to pull out 12.5 flat or lower ???????????

I meant a correction equation to see what I would have run with cooler temps?

thnx.....Q
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 01:03 PM
  #47  
TouringBubble's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 3
From: Chelsea, AL
Sorry man, I'm not going back for a while. I've had my fill of drags on my current setup. I know what kind of 60' and trap I'm capable of and that's enough for me. I'll go back when I get some more mods. I need to worry about my house for now.

I don't know of an equation to calculate "what ifs" in drag racing. It's assumed that a certain time is possible with a given trap. It might also be assumed that in cooler temps you could trap XXX. I don't know.

I don't know what is up with or times. It seems to me that I'm shifting pretty darn fast and that's the only place I could be losing time. If people are claiming ~12.3 @ 110 then something weird is definitely going on here and .3" are vanishing somewhere in the air at Steele.

In comparison to the 12.5 - 12.99 thread we are running along with the majority of 12.5 - 12.6 cars. There don't seem to be many people hitting 12.5 @ < 110, but there is room for improvement on your shifting. The most common trap for 12.6 seems to be 110, which is exactly where I am. But, since 60' times aren't listed I can't compare that to what I "should" have gotten with my 1.62.

Last edited by TouringBubble; Jul 23, 2007 at 01:51 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 05:37 PM
  #48  
LV///R's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 226
From: US
Originally Posted by Street Tuners
The original intent of this thread was to serve 2 purposes, maybe 3.
1.....to show how the K @ N intake is Not as bad and infact a good intake.
Can you explain what makes this a "good intake"? Sentences like that laughable. Is it good because your car still at least runs? Define good...


Pictures are worth a 1000 words...
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...buschur+intake
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 06:33 PM
  #49  
TouringBubble's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 3
From: Chelsea, AL
Originally Posted by TouringBubble
As far as the Typhoon intake, I honestly told him the same thing you guys are telling him. I heard the thing was crap and severely threw off the MAF readings causing problems with the mix. I honestly planned on taking a while to adjust the MAF scalings for this. However, when I showed up to tune his car his fuel trims were dead on. I saw a deviation of +3% max in the STFTs and LTFTs stayed at 0 (well, 100 in EvoScan). This deviation in STFTs was only present at idle. STFTs decreased and settled in the +1% range during cruise conditions. It seems that the intake didn't skew the readings much at all.

I will also add that the intake (be it the filter or the pipe) did wonders in smoothing the airflow curve during WOT. Airflow is super smooth over the entire rev band in comparison to my stock intake and filter.
Am I even allowed to quote myself? I'm not sure, but I posted this earlier. Perhaps you missed it. It seems that the OP has a magical K&N that doesn't cause the issues that seem to plague others.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 09:26 PM
  #50  
PWevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: North Las Vegas
Originally Posted by TouringBubble
If people are claiming ~12.3 @ 110 then something weird is definitely going on here and .3" are vanishing somewhere in the air at Steele.
It's definitely doable. My first two 12.3 runs were @ 110 and that was with 1.7 60fts. Couldn't seem to break into 1.6's. My next two 12.3's, my mph did go up, 112 and 113. I need to deflate my tires next time I go to the track as all my track time was on stock tire pressure. Hopefully it'll improve my 60ft times.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 07:29 AM
  #51  
Q@EvoPowerMods's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: In the Shop in Alabama
I'm interested to hear your shift points/revs.. do you also end up in 5th or 4th crossing the line?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2007 | 09:39 PM
  #52  
PWevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: North Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Street Tuners
I'm interested to hear your shift points/revs.. do you also end up in 5th or 4th crossing the line?
Me? I launch at 5500rpms. I was shifting between gears at about 75-7600rpms and I was crossing the line in 4th.

Last edited by PWevo; Jul 26, 2007 at 09:43 PM.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:53 AM.